本周，日本首相高市早苗上任刚满一个月，却已经在涉台、历史、领土、安保等问题上接连抛出了各种 挑衅言论，引发包括中国在内的周边多国的强烈抗议和批评。然而，高市早苗不思悔改，拒不撤回有关 错误言论，充分暴露出日本右翼势力极其错误且危险的历史观、秩序观和战略观，更让国际社会特别是 亚洲国家对日本战略走向的"危险转向"高度警惕。 11月21日晚上，日本首相官邸前聚集了上千名抗议民众，强烈要求高市早苗撤回错误言论。 11月20日，东京民众在国会前举行抗议活动，反对日本政府推动修改和平宪法，要求高市早苗撤回涉台 错误言论，向中国道歉。 日本抗议民众：高市早苗首相，不要煽动战争，立即收回你的错误言论，遵守宪法，反对战争。 民众高举"高市辞职""高市国贼"等标语牌，要求高市早苗下台。 而这一天，恰逢高市就任日本首相刚满一个月。 当天，她又作出模糊表态，称推进日中战略互惠关系想法不变，在台湾问题上的立场也没有改变。对于 自己的涉台妄言，她却并无撤回之意。 中国外交部发言人 毛宁：日方如果真心想发展中日战略互惠关系，构建契合新时代要求的建设性、稳 定的中日关系，就应该恪守中日四个政治文件精神和所作的政治承诺，立即收回错误言论，切 ...

Core Points - Europe is seeking to utilize Ukrainian technology to build a "drone wall" to counter Russia, with significant investments in the billions of euros to address security gaps in NATO following recent drone incursions into NATO airspace [1][2] - The European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the need for a coordinated defense strategy, proposing a joint development and deployment of a responsive drone defense system [2][3] - The plan includes deploying a comprehensive drone reconnaissance system supported by AI, ground sensors, satellite monitoring, and mobile countermeasures to detect and disrupt potential threats [3] Investment and Funding - The EU plans to provide €6 billion in financing to establish a "drone alliance" with Ukraine, aiming to convert Ukrainian creativity into battlefield advantages and joint industrialization [2] - Nearly €100 billion in defense-related loans will be available to NATO's eastern flank member states, sourced from a total of €150 billion in the EU's common budget [3] Military Exercises and Tensions - The "West-2025" joint strategic exercises conducted by Russia and Belarus have heightened tensions, showcasing conventional and nuclear military capabilities, which serve as a warning to the West against deploying foreign troops to Ukraine [4][5] - Poland and Latvia have taken measures to strengthen military presence along their borders with Russia and Belarus, including closing airspace and deploying thousands of soldiers [5] Ongoing Conflict and Support - The UN Secretary-General expressed pessimism regarding the peace process between Russia and Ukraine, indicating that the positions of both sides are starkly different and calling for an immediate ceasefire [6] - The U.S. is set to resume weapon supplies to Ukraine under a new mechanism established with NATO allies, with two batches of $500 million in military aid approved to enhance Ukraine's military capabilities [7]

Core Viewpoint - Japan is experiencing a dangerous shift in its long-standing nuclear policy, with increasing calls from politicians to reconsider the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and potentially develop its own nuclear weapons in response to perceived threats from the U.S. and regional instability [1][2][4][5]. Group 1: Political Dynamics - Japanese politicians, including right-wing figures, are advocating for a reassessment of Japan's nuclear stance, citing U.S. President Trump's foreign policy as a catalyst for this change [2][6]. - A growing number of senior politicians are willing to relax the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," suggesting that these principles lack legal binding and can be modified [4][5]. - Public opinion in Japan is shifting, with a recent poll indicating that 41% of respondents support revising the non-nuclear principles, a significant increase from 20% three years ago [5]. Group 2: Regional Security Concerns - The discussions around Japan's nuclear policy are occurring against a backdrop of heightened security concerns in East Asia, particularly due to the U.S.-Russia tensions and the Ukraine conflict [6][7]. - Japan is reportedly engaging in "extended deterrence consultations" with the U.S., exploring scenarios where U.S. nuclear capabilities could be utilized in regional crises [7][9]. - There are discussions about "nuclear sharing" arrangements similar to those in NATO, which would involve Japan participating in nuclear planning and operations with the U.S. [9][10]. Group 3: Historical Context and Public Sentiment - Japan's historical experience as a victim of nuclear attacks has shaped its post-war pacifist stance, but younger generations are increasingly viewing nuclear weapons through a strategic lens [10][12]. - Survivors of the atomic bombings express concern over the changing attitudes towards nuclear weapons, emphasizing the need for trust and peace rather than reliance on nuclear deterrence [12][13]. - The Chinese government has criticized Japan's potential shift towards nuclear armament, urging Japan to adhere to its non-nuclear commitments and promote global nuclear disarmament [1][13].

Group 1 - The core message of the article emphasizes Japan's commitment to nuclear disarmament and the importance of historical reflection on the consequences of war, particularly regarding the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki [1][4] - Prime Minister Kishida Fumio's remarks at the 80th anniversary of the Hiroshima bombing highlight the need for international cooperation to achieve a nuclear-free world, stressing the urgency given the current global security environment [1][3] - The article notes the presence of protestors during the memorial ceremony, indicating a societal divide regarding Japan's military policies and nuclear stance, which reflects broader public sentiment and potential political shifts [3][5] Group 2 - The discussion around Japan's nuclear policy reveals internal contradictions, particularly with rising support for nuclear armament among certain political factions, which challenges the long-standing "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [5] - The historical context provided indicates that Japan's victim narrative in World War II often overlooks its own militaristic actions, suggesting a need for a more comprehensive understanding of history [4] - The ongoing military cooperation between Japan and the United States, including discussions on nuclear sharing, raises questions about the future of Japan's nuclear policy and its alignment with the principles of disarmament [5]

Core Viewpoint - The 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was marked by protests against Japan's military expansion policies and calls for adherence to the peace constitution [1][2] Group 1: Protests and Public Sentiment - A large gathering of citizens took place at the Hiroshima bombing site, expressing strong concerns over Japan's ongoing military expansion and the implications of the Japan-U.S. alliance [1] - Protesters held signs with messages such as "The Japan-U.S. alliance is a war alliance" and "Prevent nuclear war," indicating widespread public anxiety regarding military policies [1] Group 2: Government Response - Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio reaffirmed Japan's commitment to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" during the memorial ceremony [1] - Hiroshima Mayor Matsui Kazumi emphasized the importance of remembering the nuclear bombing experience and inheriting the peace philosophy, although both officials did not address the historical context of the bombing [1]