欧盟要 " 协调防御 " 据报道，上周，在北约战机击落进入波兰领空的约19架无人机中的几架后数小时，欧盟委员会主席冯德 莱恩表示，欧洲必须在其东部边境"构建一道无人机墙"。她表示，这将是一种"由欧洲共同开发、共同 部署和共同维持的、能够实时响应的力量"。欧盟还将同乌建立"无人机联盟"，并提供60亿欧元融资支 持，以"将乌克兰的创造力转化为战场优势和联合工业化"。 法国国际广播电台称，该计划首先将部署一整套无人机侦察系统，这些无人机将借助人工智能运行，并 辅以密集的地面传感器网络、卫星监控以及机动反制平台，用以侦测并干扰潜在威胁。据报道，波兰、 芬兰、波罗的海三国等同俄邻近的欧盟国家，都宣布了加强其边境的计划，但欧盟官员警告称，这种方 法只有在统一且建立在通用、完全集成的技术之上时才会有效。一名欧盟官员称，欧洲国家防御态 势"过于分散"，需要"更多协调"，否则俄会根据各国弱点调整应对策略。北约东翼成员国将获得近1000 亿欧元的国防相关贷款，这笔资金来自欧盟共同预算中筹集的1500亿欧元。欧盟委员会发言人雷尼尔16 日表示，如果成员国希望采取共同措施保护欧盟，那么欧洲安全行动提供的贷款将有助于构建"无人机 墙" ...

Core Viewpoint - Japan is experiencing a dangerous shift in its long-standing nuclear policy, with increasing calls from politicians to reconsider the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and potentially develop its own nuclear weapons in response to perceived threats from the U.S. and regional instability [1][2][4][5]. Group 1: Political Dynamics - Japanese politicians, including right-wing figures, are advocating for a reassessment of Japan's nuclear stance, citing U.S. President Trump's foreign policy as a catalyst for this change [2][6]. - A growing number of senior politicians are willing to relax the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," suggesting that these principles lack legal binding and can be modified [4][5]. - Public opinion in Japan is shifting, with a recent poll indicating that 41% of respondents support revising the non-nuclear principles, a significant increase from 20% three years ago [5]. Group 2: Regional Security Concerns - The discussions around Japan's nuclear policy are occurring against a backdrop of heightened security concerns in East Asia, particularly due to the U.S.-Russia tensions and the Ukraine conflict [6][7]. - Japan is reportedly engaging in "extended deterrence consultations" with the U.S., exploring scenarios where U.S. nuclear capabilities could be utilized in regional crises [7][9]. - There are discussions about "nuclear sharing" arrangements similar to those in NATO, which would involve Japan participating in nuclear planning and operations with the U.S. [9][10]. Group 3: Historical Context and Public Sentiment - Japan's historical experience as a victim of nuclear attacks has shaped its post-war pacifist stance, but younger generations are increasingly viewing nuclear weapons through a strategic lens [10][12]. - Survivors of the atomic bombings express concern over the changing attitudes towards nuclear weapons, emphasizing the need for trust and peace rather than reliance on nuclear deterrence [12][13]. - The Chinese government has criticized Japan's potential shift towards nuclear armament, urging Japan to adhere to its non-nuclear commitments and promote global nuclear disarmament [1][13].

Group 1 - The core message of the article emphasizes Japan's commitment to nuclear disarmament and the importance of historical reflection on the consequences of war, particularly regarding the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki [1][4] - Prime Minister Kishida Fumio's remarks at the 80th anniversary of the Hiroshima bombing highlight the need for international cooperation to achieve a nuclear-free world, stressing the urgency given the current global security environment [1][3] - The article notes the presence of protestors during the memorial ceremony, indicating a societal divide regarding Japan's military policies and nuclear stance, which reflects broader public sentiment and potential political shifts [3][5] Group 2 - The discussion around Japan's nuclear policy reveals internal contradictions, particularly with rising support for nuclear armament among certain political factions, which challenges the long-standing "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [5] - The historical context provided indicates that Japan's victim narrative in World War II often overlooks its own militaristic actions, suggesting a need for a more comprehensive understanding of history [4] - The ongoing military cooperation between Japan and the United States, including discussions on nuclear sharing, raises questions about the future of Japan's nuclear policy and its alignment with the principles of disarmament [5]

Core Viewpoint - The 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was marked by protests against Japan's military expansion policies and calls for adherence to the peace constitution [1][2] Group 1: Protests and Public Sentiment - A large gathering of citizens took place at the Hiroshima bombing site, expressing strong concerns over Japan's ongoing military expansion and the implications of the Japan-U.S. alliance [1] - Protesters held signs with messages such as "The Japan-U.S. alliance is a war alliance" and "Prevent nuclear war," indicating widespread public anxiety regarding military policies [1] Group 2: Government Response - Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio reaffirmed Japan's commitment to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" during the memorial ceremony [1] - Hiroshima Mayor Matsui Kazumi emphasized the importance of remembering the nuclear bombing experience and inheriting the peace philosophy, although both officials did not address the historical context of the bombing [1]