规范涉企行政执法专项行动

Search documents
这些涉企行政执法问题须纠治
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-09-17 22:22
《 人民日报 》( 2025年09月18日 13 版) (责编:牛镛、袁勃) 滥用行政裁量权、类案不同罚是企业反映强烈的痛点。各地对于执法标准不一致、裁量权基准不完善等 问题,通过个案监督推动裁量标准统一,实现"过罚相当""处罚与教育相结合"。吉林某市某区政府行政 执法监督局指出区卫生健康局裁量不当,对事实不清、证据不足的行政处罚予以纠正,推动执法机关重 事实、守标准。 行政执法既不能"乱作为",也不能"不作为"。各地聚焦执法部门监管缺位、该严不严等问题进行纠治, 推动落实执法责任。新疆某县政府行政执法监督局责令县城市管理局限期履职,纠正办理企业许可申 请"不告知、不处理"的不作为行为,保障企业正常经营权益。 "随着专项行动不断深入,全国涉企行政检查数量大幅下降,精准发现问题水平有效提升,为企业退还 违法收费、依法变更或解除冻结账户,解决了一批企业关切的执法标准不一致、信用修复难等急难愁盼 问题。"司法部有关负责人表示,专项行动依法查处一批"吃拿卡要"、"粗暴执法"和执法不作为案件, 将一批不具备执法资格、严重违规人员清除出执法队伍,并移送纪检监察机关追责。 今年3月以来,规范涉企行政执法专项行动在全国范围内 ...
乱罚款、乱查封、执法不作为——这些涉企行政执法问题须纠治
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-09-17 22:03
今年3月以来,规范涉企行政执法专项行动在全国范围内全面推开。9月15日,司法部发布规范涉企行政 执法专项行动典型案例,主要涉及乱罚款、乱查封、违反执法行为规范、裁量不当、执法不作为等问 题,为各级专项行动工作专班和政府行政执法监督机构深入开展专项行动提供可复制、可推广的经验。 "罚缴分离"是行政处罚法确立的一项重要制度,旨在从源头上预防腐败、保障公正执法。案例显示, 2025年3月,四川某市某区政府行政执法监督局发现,该区市场监管局在2025年1月对某公司作出的行政 处罚决定书中,要求当事人将罚款直接缴纳至该局账户,涉嫌未执行罚缴分离有关规定。经核实,2024 年3月至2025年2月,该局作出的所有行政处罚案件均告知当事人将罚款缴纳至本局账户,再由该局将罚 款转入财政专户。该区政府行政执法监督局要求该区市场监管局限期整改,严格执行罚缴分离制度。 行政执法既不能"乱作为",也不能"不作为"。各地聚焦执法部门监管缺位、该严不严等问题进行纠治, 推动落实执法责任。新疆某县政府行政执法监督局责令县城市管理局限期履职,纠正办理企业许可申 请"不告知、不处理"的不作为行为,保障企业正常经营权益。 "随着专项行动不断深入, ...
司法部等三部门发文 推动提升涉企行政执法水平
Zheng Quan Ri Bao Wang· 2025-08-07 11:45
开展规范涉企行政执法专项行动是党中央、国务院作出的重大决策部署。2025年5月20日起正式施行的 民营经济促进法对持续优化稳定、公平、透明、可预期的民营经济发展环境,促进民营经济持续、健 康、高质量发展作出明确规定。《指导意见》结合规范涉企行政执法专项行动和贯彻落实民营经济促进 法有关部署要求,全面总结行政复议服务企业高质量发展工作经验,从总体要求、明确行政复议监督涉 企执法重点、提升行政复议吸纳涉企行政争议能力、做深做实涉企行政争议实质化解、深化涉企行政复 议办案规范效能、强化涉企行政复议以案促治、凝聚规范涉企执法工作合力七个方面提出了22项具体举 措,为加强涉企行政复议工作、推动提升涉企行政执法水平作出明确指引。 同时联合发布的10件典型案例,反映了各地认真开展行政复议服务企业高质量发展工作取得的突出成 效,为各地行政复议机构、涉企行政管理部门和工商联继续强化协同配合,共同推动高质效办理涉企行 政复议案件,妥善化解涉企行政争议,依法平等保护各类经营主体合法权益,促进提升涉企行政执法水 平提供了示范指引。 本报讯(记者吴晓璐)据司法部8月7日消息,近日,司法部会同国家发展改革委、全国工商联印发《关于 进一步 ...
省司法厅、省发展改革委、省工商联召开规范涉企行政执法专项行动民营企业座谈会
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-10 02:40
Core Viewpoint - The meeting aims to promote the standardized administrative law enforcement actions related to enterprises, enhance the protection of legitimate rights and interests of businesses, and support the high-quality development of the private economy [1][3]. Group 1: Meeting Objectives and Participants - The meeting was held to further advance the standardized administrative law enforcement actions and expand the outcomes of these actions [1]. - Participants included officials from the Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Provincial Federation of Industry and Commerce, and representatives from four chambers of commerce and ten private enterprises [1]. Group 2: Key Discussions and Recommendations - The meeting conveyed important discussions from General Secretary Xi Jinping regarding administrative law enforcement and shared insights from provincial leaders on standardizing these actions [3]. - Representatives from the chambers of commerce and enterprises provided feedback on issues such as administrative inspections, enforcement procedures, quality of law enforcement, and the construction of law enforcement teams [3]. Group 3: Implementation Strategies - The meeting emphasized the importance of the standardized administrative law enforcement actions as a significant decision by the central government to optimize the business environment and address urgent issues faced by enterprises [4]. - A digital communication mechanism between government enforcement agencies and enterprises will be established, along with the deployment of the "Longshang e-enterprise inspection" system to enhance efficiency in administrative checks [4]. - The meeting called for collaboration among various government departments to create joint consultation and assessment mechanisms to further standardize law enforcement practices and boost business confidence [4].
对企业反映的突出问题“动真碰硬”——国新办介绍规范涉企行政执法专项行动最新进展
Xin Hua She· 2025-05-22 14:10
Core Viewpoint - The government is actively addressing prominent issues reported by enterprises through a special action aimed at regulating administrative law enforcement related to businesses, resulting in a general decline in administrative fines and a reduction in arbitrary inspections [1][2]. Group 1: Objectives and Focus Areas - The special action targets four major issues: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and closures; illegal cross-regional law enforcement; inconsistent enforcement standards; and abuse of power or misconduct by law enforcement officials [2][3]. - Key focus areas for the action include food and drug safety, natural resources, ecological environment, safety production, urban management, and transportation, which are closely related to enterprises and the public [3]. Group 2: Progress and Impact - As of May 21, a total of 6,232 problem leads have been collected, with 5,246 cases addressed, recovering 98.81 million yuan for enterprises from a total of 335 million yuan in involved amounts [3]. - The action aims to optimize the business environment and stimulate market vitality by addressing issues such as unauthorized fees and excessive charges in various sectors, including logistics and utilities [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Measures and Future Directions - The action emphasizes strict adherence to laws and regulations, particularly in sectors affecting public health, with a focus on rigorous standards and accountability [6]. - Future efforts will include increased supervision of problem rectification, targeted handling of prominent issues, and measures to ensure compliance and accountability among local authorities [7].
司法部:正在研究制定《行政执法行为规范》,厘清行政执法人员权力边界和行为边界
news flash· 2025-05-22 02:50
Group 1 - The core objective of the special action is to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, addressing issues such as rough, arbitrary, and mechanical enforcement [1][2] - The action emphasizes the importance of managing, training, and supervising law enforcement personnel to improve their capabilities and qualities [1] - A new management approach for law enforcement personnel is being developed, focusing on qualification management and establishing a mechanism for entry and exit [1][2] Group 2 - The initiative includes a focus on enhancing the capabilities of law enforcement personnel through regular training, particularly scenario-based training to ensure they possess the necessary legal knowledge and skills [1][2] - The Ministry of Justice is formulating regulations to clarify the boundaries of law enforcement personnel's powers and behaviors, aiming to prevent abuse of power and misconduct [2] - The action enforces strict accountability for law enforcement personnel, with measures in place to handle violations, including disqualification and referral to disciplinary or judicial authorities [2]