据介绍，专项行动期间，全市各相关单位主动聚焦突出问题，通堵点、补短板、强弱项，推进整改各类 执法问题，基层执法理念、作风和专业能力得到明显提升。在促进企业经营环境持续改善方面，2025 年，月均现场检查量下降42.9%、非现场检查量占比提升至70.6%。各级行政机关更加聚焦关系群众切 身利益的领域开展执法监督，更加注重服务效能提升。 2月6日，在北京市人民政府新闻办公室举行的北京市法治政府建设示范创建工作成果新闻发布会上，市 司法局副局长崔冰表示，自2025年规范涉企行政执法专项行动在全国推开以来，全市55万户企业被纳 入"无事不扰"白名单，不予处罚和警告类轻处罚案件达到全部行政处罚案件的35.3%，多项举措积极助 力企业经营环境持续优化。 崔冰表示，下一步，北京将继续聚焦行政执法领域企业、群众关心的痛点、难点问题，巩固深化治理成 效，健全常态化、长效治理机制，加快推动市、区、乡镇（街道）依法行政能力整体提升，努力建设更 高水平的法治中国首善之区。（记者熊琳） 2月6日， 北京市人民政府新闻办公室举行北京市法治政府建设示范创建工作成果新闻发布会。（北京 市人民政府新闻办公室供图） ...

《 人民日报 》（ 2025年12月17日 10 版） 针对越权异地执法等问题，各级行政执法监督机构坚持个案整改与机制建设并重，将整治成果固化为长 效制度。如山东某市政府行政执法监督局提级监督下级综合行政执法局违规异地执法问题，并组织开展 同类问题排查整改，明确管辖规则，从制度机制上遏制越权执法、重复处罚等执法乱象，切实斩断"公 权私用"链条。 规范涉企行政执法专项行动除了纠治乱收费、乱罚款、乱检查、乱查封等执法突出问题，还整治执法人 员行为不当、执法标准不一致、制度落实不到位、职责边界模糊等问题。下一步，司法部将指导各地深 化规范涉企行政执法专项行动成果，聚焦企业新诉求、执法新难点，加大行政执法监督力度，推动专项 行动从集中整治向常态化规范延伸。 本报北京12月16日电 （记者张璁）司法部近日发布规范涉企行政执法专项行动第三批典型案例，集中 呈现各地在专项行动中，强化个案纠偏的同时注重机制建设的多种做法。 针对以权谋私、"吃拿卡要"等破坏市场公平、严重违反行政执法人员规范的行为，各级行政执法监督机 构坚持依法从严查处、标本兼治，维护经营主体合法权益。甘肃某区政府行政执法监督局查实区城管局 执法人员违规干预商 ...

Core Viewpoint - The State Council's recent meeting emphasized the importance of standardizing administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, aiming to optimize the business environment and stabilize market expectations [2][3][4]. Group 1: Administrative Law Enforcement Standardization - The special action to standardize administrative law enforcement for enterprises is a significant strategic decision made by the central government [4]. - Since the beginning of the year, various regions and departments have actively engaged in this special action, achieving positive results [3][4]. - From January to August, the number of administrative inspections related to enterprises decreased by over 30% year-on-year, while the problem detection rate increased by an average of 16 percentage points, indicating improved precision and effectiveness of inspections [4]. Group 2: Legislative and Supervisory Measures - The implementation of the "Administrative Law Enforcement Supervision Regulations" aims to establish a comprehensive supervision system to address issues such as fragmented responsibilities and selective enforcement [5]. - The regulations will clarify the boundaries of enforcement authority and hold accountable those who abuse power or engage in arbitrary enforcement, ensuring that administrative power operates within the rule of law [5]. - This legislative move is seen as a milestone in the construction of a rule-of-law government, providing a solid legal foundation for enterprises to conduct business and promoting high-quality economic development [5].

《 人民日报 》（ 2025年09月18日 13 版） (责编：牛镛、袁勃) 滥用行政裁量权、类案不同罚是企业反映强烈的痛点。各地对于执法标准不一致、裁量权基准不完善等 问题，通过个案监督推动裁量标准统一，实现"过罚相当""处罚与教育相结合"。吉林某市某区政府行政 执法监督局指出区卫生健康局裁量不当，对事实不清、证据不足的行政处罚予以纠正，推动执法机关重 事实、守标准。 行政执法既不能"乱作为"，也不能"不作为"。各地聚焦执法部门监管缺位、该严不严等问题进行纠治， 推动落实执法责任。新疆某县政府行政执法监督局责令县城市管理局限期履职，纠正办理企业许可申 请"不告知、不处理"的不作为行为，保障企业正常经营权益。 "随着专项行动不断深入，全国涉企行政检查数量大幅下降，精准发现问题水平有效提升，为企业退还 违法收费、依法变更或解除冻结账户，解决了一批企业关切的执法标准不一致、信用修复难等急难愁盼 问题。"司法部有关负责人表示，专项行动依法查处一批"吃拿卡要"、"粗暴执法"和执法不作为案件， 将一批不具备执法资格、严重违规人员清除出执法队伍，并移送纪检监察机关追责。 今年3月以来，规范涉企行政执法专项行动在全国范围内 ...

今年3月以来，规范涉企行政执法专项行动在全国范围内全面推开。9月15日，司法部发布规范涉企行政 执法专项行动典型案例，主要涉及乱罚款、乱查封、违反执法行为规范、裁量不当、执法不作为等问 题，为各级专项行动工作专班和政府行政执法监督机构深入开展专项行动提供可复制、可推广的经验。 "罚缴分离"是行政处罚法确立的一项重要制度，旨在从源头上预防腐败、保障公正执法。案例显示， 2025年3月，四川某市某区政府行政执法监督局发现，该区市场监管局在2025年1月对某公司作出的行政 处罚决定书中，要求当事人将罚款直接缴纳至该局账户，涉嫌未执行罚缴分离有关规定。经核实，2024 年3月至2025年2月，该局作出的所有行政处罚案件均告知当事人将罚款缴纳至本局账户，再由该局将罚 款转入财政专户。该区政府行政执法监督局要求该区市场监管局限期整改，严格执行罚缴分离制度。 行政执法既不能"乱作为"，也不能"不作为"。各地聚焦执法部门监管缺位、该严不严等问题进行纠治， 推动落实执法责任。新疆某县政府行政执法监督局责令县城市管理局限期履职，纠正办理企业许可申 请"不告知、不处理"的不作为行为，保障企业正常经营权益。 "随着专项行动不断深入， ...

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Justice, in collaboration with the National Development and Reform Commission and the All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce, has issued guidelines to enhance administrative review supervision in relation to enterprise-related administrative law enforcement, aiming to create a stable and transparent environment for the development of the private economy [1][2]. Group 1: Guidelines and Implementation - The guidelines include 22 specific measures to strengthen administrative review work and improve the level of administrative law enforcement related to enterprises [1]. - The implementation of the Private Economy Promotion Law, effective from May 20, 2025, emphasizes the need for a fair and predictable environment for the sustainable and high-quality development of the private economy [1]. Group 2: Typical Cases and Outcomes - The release of 10 typical cases demonstrates the significant achievements made by various regions in providing administrative review services that support high-quality enterprise development [2]. - These cases serve as a model for administrative review institutions and related departments to enhance collaboration and effectively resolve administrative disputes involving enterprises [2].

Core Viewpoint - The meeting aims to promote the standardized administrative law enforcement actions related to enterprises, enhance the protection of legitimate rights and interests of businesses, and support the high-quality development of the private economy [1][3]. Group 1: Meeting Objectives and Participants - The meeting was held to further advance the standardized administrative law enforcement actions and expand the outcomes of these actions [1]. - Participants included officials from the Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Provincial Federation of Industry and Commerce, and representatives from four chambers of commerce and ten private enterprises [1]. Group 2: Key Discussions and Recommendations - The meeting conveyed important discussions from General Secretary Xi Jinping regarding administrative law enforcement and shared insights from provincial leaders on standardizing these actions [3]. - Representatives from the chambers of commerce and enterprises provided feedback on issues such as administrative inspections, enforcement procedures, quality of law enforcement, and the construction of law enforcement teams [3]. Group 3: Implementation Strategies - The meeting emphasized the importance of the standardized administrative law enforcement actions as a significant decision by the central government to optimize the business environment and address urgent issues faced by enterprises [4]. - A digital communication mechanism between government enforcement agencies and enterprises will be established, along with the deployment of the "Longshang e-enterprise inspection" system to enhance efficiency in administrative checks [4]. - The meeting called for collaboration among various government departments to create joint consultation and assessment mechanisms to further standardize law enforcement practices and boost business confidence [4].

Core Viewpoint - The government is actively addressing prominent issues reported by enterprises through a special action aimed at regulating administrative law enforcement related to businesses, resulting in a general decline in administrative fines and a reduction in arbitrary inspections [1][2]. Group 1: Objectives and Focus Areas - The special action targets four major issues: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and closures; illegal cross-regional law enforcement; inconsistent enforcement standards; and abuse of power or misconduct by law enforcement officials [2][3]. - Key focus areas for the action include food and drug safety, natural resources, ecological environment, safety production, urban management, and transportation, which are closely related to enterprises and the public [3]. Group 2: Progress and Impact - As of May 21, a total of 6,232 problem leads have been collected, with 5,246 cases addressed, recovering 98.81 million yuan for enterprises from a total of 335 million yuan in involved amounts [3]. - The action aims to optimize the business environment and stimulate market vitality by addressing issues such as unauthorized fees and excessive charges in various sectors, including logistics and utilities [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Measures and Future Directions - The action emphasizes strict adherence to laws and regulations, particularly in sectors affecting public health, with a focus on rigorous standards and accountability [6]. - Future efforts will include increased supervision of problem rectification, targeted handling of prominent issues, and measures to ensure compliance and accountability among local authorities [7].

Group 1 - The core objective of the special action is to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, addressing issues such as rough, arbitrary, and mechanical enforcement [1][2] - The action emphasizes the importance of managing, training, and supervising law enforcement personnel to improve their capabilities and qualities [1] - A new management approach for law enforcement personnel is being developed, focusing on qualification management and establishing a mechanism for entry and exit [1][2] Group 2 - The initiative includes a focus on enhancing the capabilities of law enforcement personnel through regular training, particularly scenario-based training to ensure they possess the necessary legal knowledge and skills [1][2] - The Ministry of Justice is formulating regulations to clarify the boundaries of law enforcement personnel's powers and behaviors, aiming to prevent abuse of power and misconduct [2] - The action enforces strict accountability for law enforcement personnel, with measures in place to handle violations, including disqualification and referral to disciplinary or judicial authorities [2]