基金投顾，顾名思义，就是基金的投资顾问。 很多行业都有顾问，特别是一些专业性很强的行业。 文 | 银行螺丝钉 （转载请注明出处） 想要获取这个课程，可以添加下方「课程小助手」，回复「 基金投顾 」领取哦～ 更有课程笔记、思维导图，帮您快速搞懂课程脉络，学习更高效。 • 看病吃药，需要医生，医生就是顾问； • 有法律问题，需要律师，律师也是顾问。 具金投顾是什么? 有什么伺用? 长按添加@课程小助手，回复「赛令投顾 取《曝丝钉其会投顾入门 更有课程笔记、思维导图,帮你快速了解基金 例如， 基金投资也是如此。 基金投顾的诞生，正是为了解决基金行业存在的"基金赚钱，基民不赚钱"的问题。 那么，基金投顾有哪些优势？ 是如何通过"投"和"顾"，帮助投资者获得好收益的呢？ 这里有一门限时免费的福利课程，介绍了基金投顾的方方面面。 (1) 如果只投资两只股票。 波动风险，会是市场整体波动风险的2-3 倍。 换句话说，大盘如果下跌20%，只投资 两个股票，可能会遇到60%级别的波 动。 (2) 如果股票数量增加到20只。 #螺丝钉小知识 urnel 银行螺丝钉 分散到什么程度，才能有效降低 波动风险呢? 我们知道,投资中做好 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the importance of considering both returns and risks when making investment decisions, highlighting that focusing solely on returns can be dangerous [4][6] - It introduces the Sharpe Ratio as a key metric that helps investors evaluate the "cost-effectiveness" of their investments by considering both returns and risks [8][9] - The Sharpe Ratio is defined as the ratio of excess return (returns above the risk-free rate) to the volatility of the investment, where the risk-free rate is typically represented by short-term government bond yields [13][15][19] Group 2 - An example is provided comparing two funds: Fund A with a 15% return and Fund B with a 20% return, emphasizing that Fund A may be a better choice due to its lower volatility risk [21][23] - The article notes that investors do not need to calculate the Sharpe Ratio themselves, as it is usually provided in the product descriptions of both public and private funds [24] - It outlines that a Sharpe Ratio below 0 indicates that the investment is underperforming compared to risk-free assets, suggesting that such investments should be avoided [25] Group 3 - The article warns against comparing Sharpe Ratios across different strategies, as they have inherently different risk-return characteristics [27] - It emphasizes the importance of using a longer time frame (3-5 years) for evaluating the reliability of the Sharpe Ratio, as shorter periods may not capture complete market cycles [29] - The article concludes that while the Sharpe Ratio is a valuable tool, it should not be the sole metric for investment decisions; other dimensions should also be considered [31][32]