来源：智通财经 智通财经9月30日讯（编辑 胡家荣）近期AH溢价指数逼近10年低位，南下资金成交占比已达40%，港 股配置正成为机构投资者的重要战略选择。对此华泰证券在其研报中讨论在公司同质情况下，如何判断 弹性。 现象：AH溢价的近期表现与市场困惑 AH溢价指数从今年5月的134一度下降至117，处于2018年以来的最低水平。这一现象引发了市场广泛关 注：为何同一家公司在不同市场的股价会出现如此显著的差异？ 这种溢价差异不仅突破了最近5年的下限，正在逼近10年下限，且下行速度超过了市场预期。投资者最 关心的是：AH溢价为何持续走低？往后走势如何判断？这对投资决策有何指引？ 从历史数据来看，AH溢价并不具备短期快速均值回归的特性。2015年至2019年AH溢价均值为127，而 2021年至2024年则跃升为143，表明其中枢水平本身就不稳定，且指标往往偏离中枢程度大、时间长。 本质：AH溢价存在的根本原因 虽然AH两地股份同属一家上市公司，只具有一个理论上的内在价值，但两地不同投资者对企业价值的 不同估值会以交易行为反应为价格差异。 根本原因在于两地股票无充分套利机制。A股投资者并不能将其股票换成H股去香港交 ...

Core Viewpoint - The current dividend yield of the CSI Dividend Index exceeds 4%, presenting a significant attraction compared to government bond yields [2] Group 1: Investment Trends - Recent analysis by Changjiang Securities indicates that the proportion of stocks and funds held by insurance companies has fluctuated between 12% and 13% over the past three years, suggesting substantial room for growth in this area [2] - Under the current policy, insurance companies are expected to contribute at least several hundred billion yuan in long-term funds to the A-share market annually [2] Group 2: Market Conditions - Low volatility and high dividend-paying assets are likely to attract more incremental capital inflows [2] - With recent expectations of interest rate cuts and reserve requirement ratio reductions, the risk-free interest rate may continue to decline, further enhancing the investment value of dividend assets [2]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the dominance of the US dollar in the global economy, highlighting its role in shaping wealth, borrowing costs, and economic stability in the US [1][2][3] - The concept of "American exceptionalism" is discussed as a double-edged sword, granting the US significant power while also leading to potential overreach and mismanagement of its economic privileges [6][13] - Historical examples of reserve currencies, such as the Dutch Guilder, illustrate the risks associated with over-leveraging and the eventual decline of once-dominant currencies [15][28] Group 2 - The article identifies five current trends indicating a shift in the global economic landscape, including excessive national debt, rising wealth inequality, and a move towards protectionist policies [38][42][45] - It notes that the international order is transitioning from cooperative multilateralism to confrontational unilateralism, with an increased use of financial and military power [50] - The potential for significant changes in the next 5-10 years is highlighted, suggesting that understanding these fundamental shifts is crucial for risk management and investment strategies [51][52]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating The provided content does not mention the report's industry investment rating. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The "10-year Treasury yield - CSI 300 dividend yield" is used as the core indicator to observe the cost - performance ratio between stocks and bonds. The current difference is near the +1 standard deviation of the one - year rolling window and at the upper limit of the past three years, indicating that the bond's allocation value is gradually increasing, but it is not yet the time for re - allocation between stocks and bonds, and the bond market still has upward pressure [3][4][5]. - The asymmetric compression of the indicator's range since 2021 is unsustainable, and the range may return to the historical normal state of [-2 standard deviations, +2 standard deviations] due to factors such as the upward revision of fundamental expectations and the increase in investors' risk appetite [4][63][64]. - In the short term, the bond market is under phased pressure due to factors such as the strengthening of M1 year - on - year data, the increase in market risk appetite, and the expectation of "anti - involution" policies. Attention should be paid to the redemption situation of bond - type funds to avoid potential negative feedback effects [7][69]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Bond Market Weekly Review: Treasury Yields Fluctuated Upward - From August 11th to 15th, Treasury yields fluctuated upward, with the stock - bond seesaw effect dominating the bond market. The 1 - year and 10 - year Treasury yields rose by 1.59bp and 5.74bp respectively, closing at 1.3665% and 1.7465% [2][12]. - On August 11th - 12th, the bond market sentiment was under pressure due to the continuous strengthening of the equity market. On August 13th, after the release of the July financial data, the 10 - year Treasury yield slightly declined under the game of multiple and short factors. On August 14th, the bond market yield fluctuated due to the rise and fall of the equity market and the central bank's reverse - repurchase operation. On August 15th, the Treasury yield reversed and rose due to the strong rebound of the equity market [12][13]. 3.2 Bond Market Data Tracking 3.2.1 Funding Situation: Funding Rates First Declined and Then Rose - From August 11th to 15th, the central bank's open - market operations had a net withdrawal of 4,149.00 million yuan. The R001 and DR001 rose, while the R007 and DR007 declined. The SHIBOR rate also showed an upward trend [25][26][37]. - The difference between R007 and DR007 narrowed, indicating a narrowing of the funding cost difference between non - bank institutions and banks. The term spread of FR007S5Y - FR007S1Y widened [26]. 3.2.2 Supply Side: Total Issuance and Net Financing Decreased - From August 11th to 15th, the total issuance of interest - rate bonds decreased, and the net financing amount also decreased. The issuance of government bonds decreased, and the net financing of Treasury bonds and local government bonds decreased [41][44][51]. - The issuance scale of inter - bank certificates of deposit decreased, and the net financing amount decreased. The issuance scale of state - owned commercial banks was the highest among different bank types, and the 1 - year term had the highest issuance scale among different term types [51]. 3.3 Next Week's Outlook and Strategy 3.3.1 Current Position of Stock - Bond Cost - Performance Ratio - The "10 - year Treasury yield - CSI 300 dividend yield" is used to measure the stock - bond cost - performance ratio. Since 2021, the fluctuation range has been asymmetrically compressed, but it is expected to return to the historical normal state [3][61][63]. - As of August 15, 2025, the 10 - year Treasury yield was about 1.74%, the CSI 300 dividend yield was 2.76%, and the stock - bond yield difference was - 1.02% [4][63]. 3.3.2 Next Week's Outlook: The Central Funding Rate May Rise Due to Tax - Period Disturbance - Next week, the supply pressure of Treasury bonds will increase. The planned issuance of Treasury bonds is 36.2 billion yuan, and that of local government bonds is 36.915 billion yuan [67]. - Due to the tax - period disturbance and the expiration of reverse - repurchases, the central funding rate may rise [68]. 3.3.3 Bond Market Strategy: The Bond Market is Under Phased Pressure, and Potential Negative Feedback Effects Should be Watched Out - The bond market is under phased pressure due to factors such as the strengthening of M1 year - on - year data, the increase in market risk appetite, and the expectation of "anti - involution" policies [7][69]. - The strengthening of the equity market is the biggest risk for the bond market. Attention should be paid to the redemption situation of bond - type funds to avoid potential bond - market stampede risks [7][69]. 3.4 Global Major Assets - US Treasury yields generally rose, and the curve steepened. The 10Y - 2Y term spread widened by 7bp to 58bp [72]. - The US dollar index declined, and the US dollar against the RMB central parity rate slightly decreased. The prices of gold, silver, and crude oil all fell [72][73].

Group 1 - The current market rally is driven by a reassessment of confidence in the Chinese economy, which has shown resilience despite external pressures such as tariffs [1][2] - Significant events in various sectors, including AI, pharmaceuticals, and military, have bolstered market confidence in Chinese assets [1] - The market is experiencing a "slow bull" trend, differing from previous years, with a more gradual increase in stock prices and less reliance on high-risk funding [3] Group 2 - The overall profit growth has not fully materialized, indicating that the current market sentiment is more about restoring confidence rather than immediate financial performance [3] - Institutional investors are gradually reallocating funds from the bond market to the stock market, reflecting a rational assessment of valuations [3] - The market has not seen a significant influx of retail investors, with new account openings and fund subscriptions remaining stable [3]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information about the industry investment rating in the report. 2. Core Views of the Report - Overall, most credit spreads of different industries and ratings narrowed to varying degrees this week, while a few industries' credit spreads widened. The credit spreads of urban investment bonds fluctuated slightly, the 3Y industrial bond credit spreads adjusted significantly, and the AA medium - long - end spreads decreased. The 3Y bank secondary perpetual bond credit spreads widened significantly, and the spreads of other maturities widened slightly [3][39]. - The report continues to expect the 10Y Treasury yield to be between 1.6% - 1.8% in the second half of the year. After the recent pull - back, the 10Y Treasury is close to 1.75%, with prominent cost - effectiveness. The report is bullish on the 10Y Treasury yield returning to around 1.65%, and the 5Y national and joint - stock secondary capital bonds falling below 1.9%. The growth of wealth management scale is beneficial to credit bonds. It is bullish on long - duration and credit - sinking urban investment and capital bonds, urban investment dim - sum bonds and US dollar bonds, strongly recommends perpetual bonds of Minsheng, Bohai, and Hengfeng Banks, and suggests paying attention to capital bond opportunities of Tianjin Bank, Beibu Gulf Bank, and China Property Insurance [3][40]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Primary Market 3.1.1 Net Financing Scale - The net financing of credit bonds (excluding asset - backed securities) this week was 16.8 billion yuan, a decrease of 298 billion yuan compared with last week. The total issuance was 323.4 billion yuan, a decrease of 175 billion yuan, and the total repayment was 306.6 billion yuan, an increase of 122.9 billion yuan [7]. - The net financing of asset - backed securities this week was 27.8 billion yuan, an increase of 17 billion yuan compared with last week [7]. - By product type, the net financing of urban investment bonds was 35.4 billion yuan, a decrease of 40.2 billion yuan; the net financing of industrial bonds was 17.9 billion yuan, a decrease of 131.4 billion yuan; the net financing of financial bonds was - 36.5 billion yuan, a decrease of 126.4 billion yuan [7]. - In terms of issuance and redemption quantity, the issuance of urban investment bonds decreased by 21, and the redemption increased by 32; the issuance of industrial bonds decreased by 50, and the redemption increased by 39; the issuance of financial bonds decreased by 10, and the redemption increased by 14 [9]. 3.1.2 Issuance Cost - The weighted average issuance rate of AA industrial bonds increased significantly this week, while the issuance costs of other bond types were below 2.5%. The issuance rate of AA industrial bonds increased by 61BP compared with last week, mainly due to the "25 Xiangqiao Bond" [17]. 3.2 Secondary Market 3.2.1 Transaction Volume and Turnover - The trading volume of credit bonds (excluding asset - backed securities) decreased by 15.8 billion yuan compared with last week. The trading volume of urban investment bonds was 217 billion yuan, a decrease of 10.8 billion yuan; the trading volume of industrial bonds was 341 billion yuan, an increase of 9.4 billion yuan; the trading volume of financial bonds was 384.6 billion yuan, a decrease of 14.4 billion yuan. The trading volume of asset - backed securities was 18.3 billion yuan, an increase of 9.3 billion yuan [18]. - The turnover rate of credit bonds fluctuated slightly compared with last week. The turnover rate of urban investment bonds was 1.39%, a decrease of 0.07pct; the turnover rate of industrial bonds was 1.88%, an increase of 0.04pct; the turnover rate of financial bonds was 2.59%, a decrease of 0.09pct; the turnover rate of asset - backed securities was 0.5%, an increase of 0.24pct [18]. 3.2.2 Yield - The yields of credit bonds with different maturities increased to varying degrees this week, and the adjustment range of medium - long - term bonds was greater than that of short - term bonds. For example, the yields of AA, AAA -, and AAA + credit bonds within 1Y increased by 2BP, 2BP, and 1BP respectively; those of 3 - 5Y increased by 5BP; and those of over 10Y increased by 3 - 5BP [20][21]. - Taking AA + 5Y bonds of each type as an example, the yields of different types of bonds increased to varying degrees. For industrial bonds, the yields of privately - issued and perpetual industrial bonds increased by 6BP and 7BP respectively; for urban investment bonds, the yield of AA + 5Y urban investment bonds increased by 4BP; for financial bonds, the yields of commercial bank ordinary bonds and secondary capital bonds increased by 7BP and 8BP respectively; for asset - backed securities, the yield of AA + 5Y asset - backed securities increased by 6BP [22]. 3.2.3 Credit Spreads - Overall, most credit spreads of different industries and ratings narrowed to varying degrees this week, while a few industries' credit spreads widened. For example, the credit spread of AA non - bank finance widened by 6BP, and that of AA building materials narrowed by 6BP; the credit spreads of AA + electrical equipment and textile and apparel widened by 6BP and 17BP respectively, and that of AA + non - bank finance narrowed by 7BP. The fluctuations of other industries' and ratings' bond credit spreads did not exceed 5BP [2][24]. - **Urban Investment Bonds**: The credit spreads of urban investment bonds with different maturities fluctuated slightly. The 0.5 - 1Y credit spread compressed by less than 1BP, the 1 - 3Y spread widened by 1BP, the 3 - 5Y spread compressed by 1BP, the 5 - 10Y spread compressed by 1BP, and the over 10Y spread compressed by 2BP. Regionally, the fluctuations of urban investment credit spreads were within 5BP. For example, the AA credit spread in Shaanxi compressed by 5BP, and the AA + credit spread in Hebei compressed by 5BP [29][30]. - **Industrial Bonds**: The 3Y industrial bond credit spreads adjusted significantly this week, and the AA medium - long - end spreads decreased. The credit spreads of 3Y AAA -, AA +, and AA private and perpetual industrial bonds widened to varying degrees, while the 5Y and 10Y AA private and perpetual industrial bond credit spreads compressed [33]. - **Bank Capital Bonds**: The 3Y bank secondary perpetual bond credit spreads widened significantly this week, and the spreads of other maturities widened slightly [35]. 3.3 This Week's Bond Market Sentiment - 26 bond implicit ratings were downgraded this week, including 10 by Joy City Holdings Group Co., Ltd., 10 by Shanghai Waigaoqiao Group Co., Ltd., 4 by Chongqing Yerui Real Estate Development Co., Ltd., and 2 by Zhengxinglong Real Estate (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. The "20 Huaxia EB" issued by China Fortune Land Development Holdings Co., Ltd. was extended [36]. 3.4 Investment Recommendations - The report continues to expect the 10Y Treasury yield to be between 1.6% - 1.8% in the second half of the year. After the recent pull - back, the 10Y Treasury is close to 1.75%, with prominent cost - effectiveness. It is bullish on the 10Y Treasury yield returning to around 1.65%, and the 5Y national and joint - stock secondary capital bonds falling below 1.9%. The growth of wealth management scale is beneficial to credit bonds [3][40]. - It is bullish on long - duration and credit - sinking urban investment and capital bonds, urban investment dim - sum bonds and US dollar bonds, strongly recommends perpetual bonds of Minsheng, Bohai, and Hengfeng Banks, and suggests paying attention to capital bond opportunities of Tianjin Bank, Beibu Gulf Bank, and China Property Insurance [40].

Group 1 - The Ministry of Finance and the State Taxation Administration announced the resumption of value-added tax on interest income from newly issued government bonds, local government bonds, and financial bonds starting from August 8, 2025 [1][4] - The policy aims to lower the "risk-free rate" and "low-risk rate," encouraging funds to flow from bank wealth management and bond markets into the stock market, real estate, or to expand production [3][4] - The introduction of value-added tax on interest income is expected to reduce the profit margins from bond investments, which is seen as beneficial for the stock market, real estate, and the real economy [4][10] Group 2 - The average annualized yield of bank wealth management products was 2.12% as of June 30, 2025, significantly higher than the 1.3% interest rate for five-year fixed deposits, making it attractive for investors [7] - The total scale of the national bank wealth management market reached 30.67 trillion yuan, with a year-on-year increase of 7.53% [7] - The increase in bank deposits, which reached 162.9 trillion yuan, indicates that without a portion of these funds being released, economic recovery may be challenging [8] Group 3 - Recent U.S. employment data showed a significant drop in non-farm payrolls, with only 73,000 jobs added in July, far below market expectations [12][14] - The disappointing employment figures have raised concerns about a potential recession in the U.S. economy, which may lead to an increased likelihood of interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve [16][23] - The resignation of a Federal Reserve board member may provide an opportunity for potential restructuring within the Fed, with market speculation about future leadership changes [18][21]

Group 1 - The first data point indicates a high level of market speculation, with net financing purchases reaching 19.2 billion, the second highest this year, only behind February 5 [2][3] - The financing balance has increased to 1.95 trillion, surpassing the previous high of 1.94 trillion in March, marking the second highest level in history, only below the bull market period of 2015 [2][3] - The current financing balance is described as the second most active in history, suggesting a significant level of market engagement [3] Group 2 - The second data point reflects the true economic temperature, with state-owned enterprises reporting a 0.2% decline in total revenue and a 3.1% decline in total profit for the first half of the year [10][11] - A survey by the central bank indicates a decline in income confidence and employment perception, with nearly 40% of respondents feeling the job market is "average" and over 53% perceiving it as "severe" or "uncertain" [10][11] Group 3 - The third data point explains the rationale behind the stock market's performance, highlighting that the current low interest rate environment in China is driving a structural market rally, leading to a revaluation of equity assets [12][13] - The average annualized return of financial products in the first half of the year is reported at 2.12%, down from 2.65% the previous year, indicating a decline in the overall risk-free interest rate [14][15] - Companies maintaining double-digit profit growth in a low-risk interest rate environment are seen as attractive investment opportunities, particularly in sectors like innovative pharmaceuticals [15][16] Group 4 - The innovative pharmaceutical sector has seen significant gains, with stocks rising nearly 100% this year, driven by recent agreements and market interest [19][21] - Reports indicate that leading innovative pharmaceutical companies have a price-to-sales ratio in line with historical averages, suggesting continued growth potential despite recent price increases [22][23] - Fund managers specializing in pharmaceuticals are optimistic about the sector's future, emphasizing the importance of stock selection in the current market environment [24]

Group 1: Market Trends - The macroeconomic uncertainty has increased, but there is a trend towards a decline in global risk-free interest rates and improved risk appetite[6] - The U.S. stock market reached new highs, with major indices maintaining elevated levels, indicating a strong market performance[9] - The U.S. June CPI data showed a year-on-year increase of 2.7%, above the expected 2.6%, while the core CPI rose to 2.9%, aligning with expectations[28] Group 2: Inflation and Economic Indicators - Inflation risk pricing has intensified, with significant market volatility observed following the CPI release, highlighting a growing focus on inflation narratives[10] - The latest CPI data reflects a divergence in inflation trends, with strong commodity inflation and weak service inflation, suggesting future inflation risks may remain below market expectations[20] - Retail sales in June increased by 0.6%, exceeding the expected 0.1%, indicating resilient consumer spending despite price increases driven by tariffs[34] Group 3: Policy and Political Influences - Trump's shift from a populist agenda to a market-focused approach has been pivotal in explaining the market rebound since April, with policies aimed at stabilizing and boosting the economy[15] - The tightening concerns are viewed as short-term, while expansionary drivers are expected to dominate the trend moving forward[20] - The geopolitical landscape and policy uncertainties continue to pose risks to economic stability, impacting market sentiment[3]

Group 1 - The overall investment returns in the past two years have exceeded expectations, primarily driven by luck [1] - The initial investment goal was set at a modest 10%, focusing on deep value stocks and long-term ROE [1] - The investment strategy has shifted towards companies with strong fundamentals and high dividend yields, particularly those offering over 6% [2] Group 2 - The current market sentiment suggests that many believe banks are overvalued, but this perspective may not hold when considering long-term performance and dividend yields [2] - The importance of not using leverage in investments is emphasized, regardless of market conditions [2] - The psychological aspect of handling gains and losses is a significant concern, highlighting the difficulty of managing emotions in investing [3]