国泰海通证券 | 研究所 十八道合 66 决胜于 2026年表观年度展望 型中华 国泰海通研究所宏观首席分析师 登记编号: S0880525040019 直播看点 怎么理解"决胜于价"?对于2026年 的财政政策和货币政策有什么预期? 如何看待未来无风险利率的变化趋势? I + % 旗 本公众订阅号(微信号 GTHT RESEARCH )为国泰海通证券股份有限公司(以下简称"国泰海通证券") 研 更多国泰海通研究和服务 亦可联系对口销售获取 重要提醒 本订阅号所载内容仅面向国泰海通证券研究服务签约客户。因本资料暂时无法设置访问限制，根据《证 券期货投资者适当性管理办法》的要求，若您并非国泰海通证券研究服务签约客户，为保证服务质量、 控制投资风险，还请取消关注，请勿订阅、接收或使用本订阅号中的任何信息。我们对由此给您造成的 不便表示诚挚歉意，非常感谢您的理解与配合！如有任何疑问，敬请按照文末联系方式与我们联系。 法律声明 ...

指数估值日期：2025-11-24 中证全指 市盈率19.91市盈率百分位86.73%市净率1.56市净率百分位41.66% 无风险利率 中国10年国债收益率=1.82% 美国10年国债收益率=4.05% A股主要宽基指数估值表 指数名称市盈率（PE）市净率（PB）市盈率百分位市净率百分位股息率ROE科创 50146.055.7980.292.110.463.35中证A50015.591.4779.5179.512.328.59中证100044.912.363.9241.331.25.1上 证5011.171.1357.7831.562.949.01沪深30013.11.2657.1821.492.588.55中证50031.072.0556.9839.751.466.57 创业板指37.854.8623.4855.961.011.18 A股主要行业指数估值表 指数名称市盈率（PE）市净率（PB）市盈率百分位市净率百分位股息率ROE综合 711.012.2896.4827.581.02.31计算机201.454.3793.2463.460.742.34商贸零售106.581.9392.7729.011.353 ...

Group 1 - The core concept emphasizes the importance of foundational knowledge in investing and selecting the right funds, suggesting that a solid understanding of investment fundamentals is crucial for success [2] Group 2 - The article highlights the significance of the 10-year government bond as a benchmark in the bond market, often referred to as the "reference anchor" for pricing other bonds [3] - It explains that government bonds are backed by national credit, making them a low-risk investment and typically regarded as the benchmark for risk-free interest rates [3]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant information provided 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In the short - term, after the meeting between Chinese and US leaders and repeated digestion of domestic policy benefits, the stock index should be cautious about callback risks; the Fed's interest rate decision is hawkish, and the market's expectation of a December interest rate cut has decreased. Gold may continue to adjust after a short - term rebound [29]. - In the medium - to long - term, the valuation of the stock index is mainly dragged down by the decline in corporate profit growth at the molecular end, while the support at the denominator end mainly comes from the recovery of risk appetite. The stock index maintains a wide - range oscillation in the medium term; concerns about the uncertainty of US tariff policies have subsided, and gold may face a deep adjustment due to factors such as the easing of the geopolitical situation in the Middle East and the downward adjustment of the Fed's December interest rate cut expectation [29][30] 3. Summaries According to Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Macroeconomic Data - In October this year, the official manufacturing PMI dropped to 49, a decrease of 0.8 percentage points from the previous month, and it has been in the contraction range for 7 consecutive months. Industrial production has slowed down significantly, demand has declined again, external demand pressure has increased, and the business climate of small and medium - sized enterprises has weakened [2] 3.2 Stock Index Fundamental Data 3.2.1 Enterprise Profit - From January to September this year, the profits of industrial enterprises above a designated size increased by 3.2% year - on - year, rebounding for two consecutive months. However, there is a differentiation in business performance among different industries. The profits of high - end and equipment manufacturing industries maintain rapid growth, while the operating pressure on downstream enterprises remains high [11] 3.2.2 Capital Situation - The margin trading balance in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets has risen to 2473.27 billion yuan. The central bank conducted 2068 billion yuan of 7 - day reverse repurchase operations and 900 billion yuan of one - year MLF operations this week, achieving a net injection of 1400.8 billion yuan [15] 3.3 Gold Fundamental Data 3.3.1 Risk - free Rate: Holding Cost and Inflation Level - The Fed cut interest rates by 25 basis points as expected at its October meeting, but the divergence among participants on future interest rate policies has increased. They believe that the lack of economic data may lead to a delay in interest rate cuts, and the 10 - year US Treasury yield has returned above the 4% mark [21] 3.3.2 US Consumer Confidence Index and Employment Situation - No specific data provided 3.3.3 Gold Inventory Situation - The warehouse receipts and inventory of Shanghai gold futures have slowed down, but the inventory of COMEX gold in New York has continued to decline, indicating a decrease in the risk of a short squeeze [28] 3.4 Strategy Recommendations - Short - term: After the end of the meeting between Chinese and US leaders and repeated digestion of domestic policy benefits, pay attention to the callback risk of the stock index in the short - term; the Fed's interest rate decision is hawkish, and the market's expectation of a December interest rate cut has decreased. Gold may continue to adjust after a short - term rebound [29] - Medium - to long - term: The valuation of the stock index is mainly dragged down by the decline in corporate profit growth at the molecular end, while the support at the denominator end mainly comes from the recovery of risk appetite. The stock index maintains a wide - range oscillation in the medium term; concerns about the uncertainty of US tariff policies have subsided, and gold may face a deep adjustment due to factors such as the easing of the geopolitical situation in the Middle East and the downward adjustment of the Fed's December interest rate cut expectation [29][30]

Core Viewpoint - The recent pullback in international gold prices is attributed to profit-taking after previous highs and a technical need for short-term adjustments, which is considered a normal fluctuation during high-level operations [1] Group 1: Market Dynamics - Global fiscal deficits are expected to continue expanding, and the Federal Reserve is likely to maintain a loose monetary policy [1] - In a loose environment, the risk-free interest rate remains low, enhancing the appeal of gold as a "no-credit-backed" safe-haven asset [1] - The stable trend of central bank gold purchases highlights the long-term strategic value of gold allocation, supported by both policy and demand factors [1] Group 2: Short-term Outlook - This week, market focus will be on geopolitical developments, particularly in the Russia-Ukraine context, as well as the Federal Reserve's interest rate decision, which may impact short-term gold price movements [1] - From a technical perspective, short-term support is observed in the range of $3970 to $3950 per ounce, while resistance is noted at around $4070 per ounce [1] - Continuous monitoring of global debt and central bank gold purchasing dynamics is essential, along with vigilance against short-term sentiment-induced volatility, while emphasizing the sustainability of long-term support logic [1]

Group 1 - The article discusses the importance of considering both returns and risks when making investment decisions, highlighting that focusing solely on returns can be dangerous [4][6] - It introduces the Sharpe Ratio as a key metric that helps investors evaluate the "cost-effectiveness" of their investments by considering both returns and risks [8][9] - The Sharpe Ratio is defined as the ratio of excess return (returns above the risk-free rate) to the volatility of the investment, where the risk-free rate is typically represented by short-term government bond yields [13][15][19] Group 2 - An example is provided comparing two funds: Fund A with a 15% return and Fund B with a 20% return, emphasizing that Fund A may be a better choice due to its lower volatility risk [21][23] - The article notes that investors do not need to calculate the Sharpe Ratio themselves, as it is usually provided in the product descriptions of both public and private funds [24] - It outlines that a Sharpe Ratio below 0 indicates that the investment is underperforming compared to risk-free assets, suggesting that such investments should be avoided [25] Group 3 - The article warns against comparing Sharpe Ratios across different strategies, as they have inherently different risk-return characteristics [27] - It emphasizes the importance of using a longer time frame (3-5 years) for evaluating the reliability of the Sharpe Ratio, as shorter periods may not capture complete market cycles [29] - The article concludes that while the Sharpe Ratio is a valuable tool, it should not be the sole metric for investment decisions; other dimensions should also be considered [31][32]

Core Viewpoint - The recent decline in the AH premium index, approaching a 10-year low, has raised concerns among investors regarding the significant price differences of the same companies listed in both A-shares and H-shares markets [1][3]. Group 1: AH Premium Performance - The AH premium index has dropped from 134 in May to 117, marking the lowest level since 2018, leading to widespread market confusion about the reasons behind this decline [1][3]. - Historical data indicates that the AH premium does not exhibit a tendency for short-term rapid mean reversion, with average premiums varying significantly over different periods [3][4]. Group 2: Fundamental Reasons for AH Premium - The fundamental reason for the AH premium lies in the differing valuations by investors in the two markets, as there is no sufficient arbitrage mechanism allowing for easy conversion between A-shares and H-shares [4][6]. - The differences in investor structure and trading systems between the two markets contribute to the observed price discrepancies, with foreign capital playing a larger role in the H-share market [6][7]. Group 3: Quantitative Analysis of Factors - The impact of dividend tax on the price difference is estimated to be around 5%, contrary to the common belief of 25%, indicating a more nuanced understanding of the factors affecting the AH premium [7][10]. - A comprehensive analysis suggests that the long-term theoretical center for the AH price difference may be around 26% to 27%, but this is subject to significant variability due to the lack of effective short-term theoretical centers [10][12]. Group 4: Future Outlook on AH Premium - The current trading dynamics suggest that while the AH premium may remain low, it does not guarantee a reversal opportunity, as external factors like the strength of the US dollar and market trends play a crucial role [10][12]. - Predictions indicate that if the US dollar weakens and the Hang Seng Index valuation rises, the AH premium could potentially decline further to below 15% [10][12]. Group 5: Investment Strategy - In investment decisions, it is essential to consider both capital gains and dividend returns, with capital gains being significantly more impactful than dividend yields [11][12]. - The assessment of AH premium trends is critical for stock selection between A-shares and H-shares, as the dividend yield advantage of H-shares may not compensate for capital gains from A-shares if the AH premium expands [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The current dividend yield of the CSI Dividend Index exceeds 4%, presenting a significant attraction compared to government bond yields [2] Group 1: Investment Trends - Recent analysis by Changjiang Securities indicates that the proportion of stocks and funds held by insurance companies has fluctuated between 12% and 13% over the past three years, suggesting substantial room for growth in this area [2] - Under the current policy, insurance companies are expected to contribute at least several hundred billion yuan in long-term funds to the A-share market annually [2] Group 2: Market Conditions - Low volatility and high dividend-paying assets are likely to attract more incremental capital inflows [2] - With recent expectations of interest rate cuts and reserve requirement ratio reductions, the risk-free interest rate may continue to decline, further enhancing the investment value of dividend assets [2]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the dominance of the US dollar in the global economy, highlighting its role in shaping wealth, borrowing costs, and economic stability in the US [1][2][3] - The concept of "American exceptionalism" is discussed as a double-edged sword, granting the US significant power while also leading to potential overreach and mismanagement of its economic privileges [6][13] - Historical examples of reserve currencies, such as the Dutch Guilder, illustrate the risks associated with over-leveraging and the eventual decline of once-dominant currencies [15][28] Group 2 - The article identifies five current trends indicating a shift in the global economic landscape, including excessive national debt, rising wealth inequality, and a move towards protectionist policies [38][42][45] - It notes that the international order is transitioning from cooperative multilateralism to confrontational unilateralism, with an increased use of financial and military power [50] - The potential for significant changes in the next 5-10 years is highlighted, suggesting that understanding these fundamental shifts is crucial for risk management and investment strategies [51][52]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating The provided content does not mention the report's industry investment rating. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The "10-year Treasury yield - CSI 300 dividend yield" is used as the core indicator to observe the cost - performance ratio between stocks and bonds. The current difference is near the +1 standard deviation of the one - year rolling window and at the upper limit of the past three years, indicating that the bond's allocation value is gradually increasing, but it is not yet the time for re - allocation between stocks and bonds, and the bond market still has upward pressure [3][4][5]. - The asymmetric compression of the indicator's range since 2021 is unsustainable, and the range may return to the historical normal state of [-2 standard deviations, +2 standard deviations] due to factors such as the upward revision of fundamental expectations and the increase in investors' risk appetite [4][63][64]. - In the short term, the bond market is under phased pressure due to factors such as the strengthening of M1 year - on - year data, the increase in market risk appetite, and the expectation of "anti - involution" policies. Attention should be paid to the redemption situation of bond - type funds to avoid potential negative feedback effects [7][69]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Bond Market Weekly Review: Treasury Yields Fluctuated Upward - From August 11th to 15th, Treasury yields fluctuated upward, with the stock - bond seesaw effect dominating the bond market. The 1 - year and 10 - year Treasury yields rose by 1.59bp and 5.74bp respectively, closing at 1.3665% and 1.7465% [2][12]. - On August 11th - 12th, the bond market sentiment was under pressure due to the continuous strengthening of the equity market. On August 13th, after the release of the July financial data, the 10 - year Treasury yield slightly declined under the game of multiple and short factors. On August 14th, the bond market yield fluctuated due to the rise and fall of the equity market and the central bank's reverse - repurchase operation. On August 15th, the Treasury yield reversed and rose due to the strong rebound of the equity market [12][13]. 3.2 Bond Market Data Tracking 3.2.1 Funding Situation: Funding Rates First Declined and Then Rose - From August 11th to 15th, the central bank's open - market operations had a net withdrawal of 4,149.00 million yuan. The R001 and DR001 rose, while the R007 and DR007 declined. The SHIBOR rate also showed an upward trend [25][26][37]. - The difference between R007 and DR007 narrowed, indicating a narrowing of the funding cost difference between non - bank institutions and banks. The term spread of FR007S5Y - FR007S1Y widened [26]. 3.2.2 Supply Side: Total Issuance and Net Financing Decreased - From August 11th to 15th, the total issuance of interest - rate bonds decreased, and the net financing amount also decreased. The issuance of government bonds decreased, and the net financing of Treasury bonds and local government bonds decreased [41][44][51]. - The issuance scale of inter - bank certificates of deposit decreased, and the net financing amount decreased. The issuance scale of state - owned commercial banks was the highest among different bank types, and the 1 - year term had the highest issuance scale among different term types [51]. 3.3 Next Week's Outlook and Strategy 3.3.1 Current Position of Stock - Bond Cost - Performance Ratio - The "10 - year Treasury yield - CSI 300 dividend yield" is used to measure the stock - bond cost - performance ratio. Since 2021, the fluctuation range has been asymmetrically compressed, but it is expected to return to the historical normal state [3][61][63]. - As of August 15, 2025, the 10 - year Treasury yield was about 1.74%, the CSI 300 dividend yield was 2.76%, and the stock - bond yield difference was - 1.02% [4][63]. 3.3.2 Next Week's Outlook: The Central Funding Rate May Rise Due to Tax - Period Disturbance - Next week, the supply pressure of Treasury bonds will increase. The planned issuance of Treasury bonds is 36.2 billion yuan, and that of local government bonds is 36.915 billion yuan [67]. - Due to the tax - period disturbance and the expiration of reverse - repurchases, the central funding rate may rise [68]. 3.3.3 Bond Market Strategy: The Bond Market is Under Phased Pressure, and Potential Negative Feedback Effects Should be Watched Out - The bond market is under phased pressure due to factors such as the strengthening of M1 year - on - year data, the increase in market risk appetite, and the expectation of "anti - involution" policies [7][69]. - The strengthening of the equity market is the biggest risk for the bond market. Attention should be paid to the redemption situation of bond - type funds to avoid potential bond - market stampede risks [7][69]. 3.4 Global Major Assets - US Treasury yields generally rose, and the curve steepened. The 10Y - 2Y term spread widened by 7bp to 58bp [72]. - The US dollar index declined, and the US dollar against the RMB central parity rate slightly decreased. The prices of gold, silver, and crude oil all fell [72][73].