Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the role of the Supreme People's Court in supervising and correcting illegal administrative enforcement actions to protect the property rights and other legitimate rights of market entities [1] - The second batch of five typical cases released focuses on how the courts have made rulings that favor the substantive resolution of administrative disputes, enhancing the effectiveness of dispute resolution through various measures [1] - The article highlights the commitment to ensure that the central government's decisions regarding the development of the private economy are effectively implemented [1]

中新社北京8月12日电 中国最高人民法院12日发布第一批涉企行政强制典型案例，旨在规范涉企行 政强制，优化法治化营商环境。 此次发布的5个涉企行政强制典型案例，包含2个行政强制措施、2个行政强制执行和1个非诉行政强 制案例。案例涉及种类多样，既包括查封设施、扣押财物等行政强制措施，也包括行政强制执行、申请 人民法院强制执行等。 在"某新能源公司、包某诉浙江省温州市鹿城区市场监督管理局扣押财物及行政赔偿案"中，法院一 审判决确认扣押行为违法并判令区市监局赔偿包某船期损失24万元人民币。 在"某绿化有限责任公司诉辽宁省锦州市太和区人民政府强制拆除房屋案"中，法院结合司法解释规 定和在案证据，确定了区政府系适格被告并判决确认其行为违法，避免企业因维权无门而陷入经营困 境。 最高法相关负责人称，今年3月以来，规范涉企行政执法专项行动在全国范围内全面推开。最高法 要求各地法院加大对涉企市场准入、行政许可、行政处罚、行政强制和行政赔偿等重点领域行政案件的 司法审查力度。 最高法相关负责人称，案例发布集中体现了法院通过监督、纠正违法行政强制行为，依法保护市场 主体财产权和其他合法权益的坚强决心，有利于强化规范指导，进一步防 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court emphasizes that the rule of law is the best business environment, highlighting the release of typical administrative enforcement cases to protect the rights and interests of market entities and promote high-quality development of the private economy [1] Group 1: Administrative Enforcement Cases - The Supreme People's Court selected 10 typical administrative enforcement cases involving various types of administrative enforcement measures, including property seizure and administrative execution [1] - The cases cover diverse industries such as greening, telecommunications, tourism, energy, pharmaceuticals, decoration, and cultural dissemination, reflecting the broad scope of administrative management [1] - The cases illustrate significant legal issues, including the exploration and improvement of legal application standards regarding administrative subject qualifications, statutory powers, enforcement basis, enforcement procedures, and protection of legitimate interests [1] Group 2: Case Summaries - Case 1: A rafting company sued the local tourism bureau for unlawfully seizing its property without proper legal basis, resulting in a court ruling that confirmed the seizure was illegal and ordered compensation for losses incurred [3][4][6] - Case 2: A new energy company and its owner contested the local market supervision bureau's seizure of a ship and oil products, with the court ruling that the bureau failed to follow due process, leading to compensation for losses [7][8][9] - Case 3: A greening company challenged the local government’s forced demolition of its property, with the court confirming the demolition was illegal due to lack of proper legal procedures [10][11][12] - Case 4: A telecommunications company contested the unlawful demolition of its facilities by a local street office, resulting in a court ruling that the demolition violated legal procedures [13][14][15] - Case 5: A decoration company faced an administrative penalty for wage arrears but successfully contested the enforcement of the penalty due to the company's timely payment of owed wages, leading to a court ruling against the enforcement [17][18]