主业转型多方共赢 作为重整新规后新申请重整中首家披露《预重整计划草案》的上市公司，*ST交投（002200）仅以两个 月时间就完成了从法院进行预重整备案登记到公布《预重整计划草案》的流程，跑出了今年新申请预重 整上市公司的最快速度。 10月中下旬，法院正式受理了申请人对*ST交投的重整申请，11月上旬，《云南交投生态科技股份有限 公司重整计划(草案)》《（以下简称"重整计划(草案)"）正式亮相，这家深耕绿化、工程领域二十余年 的云南本土企业，即将通过法治化、市场化手段卸下历史包袱，驶入"生态+"产业体系的新赛道。重整 工作进入提速阶段。 重整计划亮点纷呈 据《重整计划（草案）》显示，*ST交投按照每10股转增14.50股的比例实施资本公积转增股本，转增股 份将用于引入重整投资资金、抵偿债务及补充流动性。此外，草案充分考虑到股东与债权人利益的平 衡。一方面，既避免"退市"损害股东持股利益，又增强了股东未来的持股价值。另一方面，产业投资人 36个月锁定期的设置，凸显产业投资人对上市公司长期发展的信心；锁定期差异化设置12个月、15个 月、18个月及24个月，既可缓解市场集中减持压力，也向市场传递"做时间的朋友"长 ...

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court of China released the first batch of typical cases related to administrative enforcement involving enterprises, aiming to standardize administrative enforcement and optimize the legal business environment [1][2] - Since March of this year, a nationwide special action to regulate administrative law enforcement involving enterprises has been fully launched, with an emphasis on judicial review of key areas such as market access, administrative licensing, administrative penalties, administrative enforcement, and administrative compensation [1] - From 2022 to 2024, approximately 8% of all first-instance administrative cases received by courts involve administrative enforcement related to enterprises, highlighting the balance between supporting lawful administrative actions and correcting illegal enforcement measures [1] Group 2 - The five typical cases released include two administrative enforcement measures, two administrative executions, and one non-litigation administrative enforcement case, covering a variety of issues such as property seizure and administrative execution [1][2] - In the case involving a certain new energy company against the market supervision administration of Wenzhou, the court ruled that the seizure was illegal and ordered compensation of 240,000 RMB for shipping losses [1] - In another case concerning a landscaping company against the government of Jinzhou, the court confirmed the government's actions as illegal, thereby protecting the enterprise's rights and preventing operational difficulties [2]

Group 1 - The Ministry of Natural Resources reported ongoing illegal land occupation and ecological destruction activities, including illegal mining and deforestation, with 21 typical violations identified [2][3] - Specific violations include unauthorized land occupation for forestry and agriculture, with notable cases such as the illegal occupation of 683.19 acres of forest land by a company in Guizhou and 459.20 acres of basic farmland by a company in Inner Mongolia [2][3] - The report highlights that a significant portion of these violations is driven by local government actions and inadequate regulatory oversight, emphasizing the need for strict compliance and accountability [3] Group 2 - The Ministry plans to enhance law enforcement and supervision through the implementation of a forest chief system, aiming to strengthen the responsibility of local governments in protecting forest and grassland resources [4] - The report indicates that illegal land occupation remains a prevalent issue, despite previous government notifications aimed at curbing non-agricultural use of farmland [3] - Future efforts will focus on establishing a long-term regulatory mechanism to ensure the protection of farmland and ecological safety [4]