Core Viewpoint - Lilith Games, known as one of the "Four Little Dragons of Shanghai Gaming," has launched its shooting game "Far Light 84" after a significant investment of 1 billion yuan and 6 years of development, but the game's performance post-launch has been underwhelming, with mixed reviews and a rapid decline in rankings [1][6][10]. Group 1: Game Performance - "Far Light 84" has seen a disappointing performance since its global launch, quickly falling out of the top 200 on iOS and receiving mixed reviews from players, with accusations of copying other games [1][6][10]. - The game peaked at over 40,000 concurrent players during its initial overseas operation but has since dropped to around 5,000 concurrent players post-launch, indicating a significant decline in interest [4][5]. - The game has only achieved an estimated 367,000 downloads and generated approximately $29,000 in revenue since its launch, which is minimal compared to the investment made [6][8]. Group 2: Game Quality and Issues - Players have noted that "Far Light 84" shares high similarities in gameplay with popular titles like "Apex Legends" and "High Energy Heroes," which may have contributed to its lack of originality [3][4]. - The game has been plagued by rampant cheating, with numerous hacks available for purchase on third-party platforms, negatively impacting the player experience [8][10]. - Internal issues during development, including multiple changes in the core team and significant alterations to the game engine, have led to a lack of cohesion and innovation in the final product [10][12]. Group 3: Market Position and Competition - Lilith Games has struggled to compete in the shooting game market, particularly against Tencent's successful titles like "Delta Action," which has surpassed 20 million daily active users [15]. - The company's shift from its strengths in SLG games to the shooting genre has been criticized, as it failed to leverage its existing expertise effectively [12][15]. - Analysts suggest that the game's inconsistent positioning and reliance on trends have resulted in a product that lacks a clear identity and competitive edge in a crowded market [14][15].