湖南湘江新区梅溪湖国际新城 ◎记者 夏子航 9月24日，湖南推动股权投资高质量发展座谈会在长沙举办。本次座谈会由湖南省人民政府主办，湖南 省委金融办、湖南湘江新区管委会承办。湖南省副省长王俊寿主持会议并作总结讲话。 这是湖南省政府层面首次举办的股权投资高质量发展座谈会。会议层次高、内容实、导向明，汇聚了业 内40余家省外头部私募基金、券商及本省机构代表。会议主要任务是深化湖南与创投资本、金融资本的 交流对接，进一步促进建立长期稳定的合作关系，加快推动湖南省多层次资本市场建设，促进湖南股权 投资事业蓬勃发展，持续助力湖南擘画"三高四新"美好蓝图。 深化湖南与创投、金融资本交流对接 在本次座谈会上，国家中小企业发展基金、国新基金、国寿股权、浦东科创、中芯聚源、中金资本、深 创投、同创伟业、中信建投、中信证券、申万宏源证券等13家国内头部股权投资机构和证券公司代表发 言，表达了进一步"投资湖南"的期待，并为湖南股权投资事业发展建言献策。 国家中小企业发展基金通过中小企业发展基金锐正（上海）创投基金，正与湘江新区开展深入合作，目 前基金总投资额超5亿元，投资项目17个，主要投资对象为种子期、初创期成长型中小企业。 深 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of recent tariff agreements between the United States and various countries, highlighting a shift from a rules-based international trade system to one dominated by power dynamics, particularly emphasizing the unequal nature of these agreements [4][5][9]. Summary by Sections Tariff Agreements - The United States has reached tariff agreements with several countries, including the EU, which will eliminate tariffs on U.S. industrial products, such as a 10% tariff on automobiles [7][8]. - Other countries like Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam have also agreed to reduce or eliminate tariffs on U.S. products, with Indonesia canceling tariffs on 99% of U.S. goods [7][8]. Impact on Global Trade - The agreements signify a departure from the World Trade Organization's (WTO) principle of Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) treatment, which could harm emerging and developing countries' access to markets [9]. - The fragmentation of global trade is highlighted, as countries like India and Brazil resist entering into unequal agreements with the U.S., while China responds with export controls [9][10]. Risks to International Order - The article warns of the risks associated with the collapse of a transparent WTO system, which could lead to increased inequality in international trade and hinder the growth of emerging economies [9]. - The potential for a divided global economy is discussed, with the emergence of distinct blocs centered around the U.S. and China, reminiscent of historical economic divisions that led to conflict [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of recent trade agreements between the U.S. and various countries, highlighting a shift from rule-based trade to power-based trade, with the EU accepting what is termed an "unequal agreement" [1][2]. Group 1: Trade Agreements and Tariff Changes - The EU has agreed to eliminate tariffs on U.S. industrial products, including a 10% tariff on automobiles, marking a significant shift in trade policy [2]. - In addition to the EU, countries like Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam have also agreed to reduce or eliminate tariffs on U.S. products, with Indonesia planning to remove tariffs on 99% of U.S. goods [2]. - The U.S. plans to impose reciprocal tariffs of 15% on EU products and 19% on Indonesian products, indicating that the agreements are favorable to the U.S. [2][3]. Group 2: Risks to Global Trade - The collapse of the transparent World Trade Organization (WTO) system is a significant risk, as the EU's actions violate the Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) principle, which has been a cornerstone of international trade since 1948 [2][3]. - The potential damage to emerging and developing countries' international trade is highlighted, as unequal rules could hinder their market access despite improvements in competitiveness [3]. - The fragmentation of global trade is another risk, as countries like India and Brazil resist entering unequal agreements with the U.S., while China takes countermeasures against U.S. policies [3][4]. Group 3: The Shift in Global Economic Order - The article notes a division in the global economy into blocs led by the U.S. and its allies, and a separate group centered around China, which could lead to increased geopolitical tensions [4]. - The abandonment of the MFN principle in U.S.-EU agreements is seen as a significant loophole that undermines the establishment of future international rules, particularly in areas like climate change [4]. - The commentary from former IMF chief economist Olivier Blanchard emphasizes the dangers of a return to a "jungle law" scenario, where the strong dominate the weak, threatening global peace and stability [4].

Group 1 - The article discusses the establishment of the Hunan Jin Furong Science and Technology Innovation Guidance Fund, aimed at fostering new productive forces and supporting long-term capital investment in hard technology [1] - The fund will focus on the "4×4" modern industrial system outlined by the provincial government, creating both comprehensive and specialized early-stage science and technology sub-funds [1] - The target scale for comprehensive sub-funds is set at no less than 300 million yuan, while specialized sub-funds will aim for a minimum of 200 million yuan, focusing on emerging industries such as artificial intelligence and biomedicine [1]