Group 1 - The article discusses the contrasting ideologies represented by the candidates in the 2024 U.S. presidential election, highlighting political conservatism and a distorted form of neoliberalism known as "wokeness" [1][3] - Wokeness, which has gained traction since the 2020 Black Lives Matter movement, seeks to address social inequalities related to gender and race while promoting a multitude of sexual orientations and enforcing political correctness [1][3] - The article emphasizes the historical context of nationalism and its lessons from the 19th century, suggesting that the rise of wokeness has left many feeling uncertain about the future of globalization [3][4] Group 2 - The author traces the philosophical roots of wokeness back to postmodernism, which emerged in the late 20th century and challenged established truths, leading to a crisis of authenticity in contemporary society [3][4] - The book "Real and Virtual: Philosophy in the Post-Truth Era" analyzes the long-term factors contributing to the rise of postmodernism and its impact on global ideologies, including Marxism and neoliberalism [4][6] - The article argues that the scientific wars of the 1990s, which criticized postmodernism, did not resolve the ongoing crisis of authenticity faced by the modern world [6][9] Group 3 - The author proposes that a return to a philosophy of authenticity is necessary to address the challenges posed by wokeness and to understand consciousness and its origins [9][10] - The discussion includes the integration of scientific methodologies into philosophical discourse, suggesting that the legacy of 20th-century scientific thought can help navigate contemporary philosophical dilemmas [10][11] - The article highlights the relationship between artificial intelligence and philosophy, indicating that while AI can process language, it lacks consciousness, which raises questions about the nature of knowledge and understanding [11][12]

大脑研究与人工智能 【编者按】当语言模型越来越像人类， "意识"这一哲学和科学交界的谜题依旧未解。我们该如何理解这场科学与哲学的碰撞？今天，我们带来《我的哲学 探索》一书中最为深刻的一章，作者试图以哲学的视角、科学的案例、认知的反思，走出现代科学对"意识"的困境，照亮一条从"现代常识理性"迈向"科学 理性"乃至"真实性哲学"的道路。 投稿 | 中信出版集团 责编｜梦依丹 出品丨AI 科技大本营 AI 有意识了吗？ 这是一个越来越难以回避的问题。尤其是在 OpenAI 发布 o1 之后，我们看到了前所未有的智能错觉：AI 不再只是机械地回答问题，而是表现出一 种"似乎理解了你"的状态。与此同时，DeepSeek R1 的推出，也让推理能力成为大模型的标配，"像人一样思考"成为新的技术追求。 从技术角度看，这一轮大模型的进化，更像是在建构一个"拟态意识系统"——它并不真的理解世界，但却能以高度一致的方式，模拟出理解的效果；它 没有主观体验，却能精准模仿人类语言中的情绪、动机与逻辑。 哲学家金观涛指出，要真正理解当下的智能浪潮，必须回到科学发展的历史现场，从哲学角度重新思考"真实""虚拟"以及"人之为人"的根本问题 ...