穿透式监管机制
Search documents
非车险“报行合一”即将实施 警惕“上有政策、下有对策”
Jin Rong Shi Bao· 2025-10-22 06:04
距离非车险"报行合一"实施还有10天时间。 转型必然面临短期"阵痛",但却是险企实现高质量发展的必经之路。当然,政策落地的效果取决于监管 部门引导与险企响应的双向奔赴。在政策执行过程中,还需警惕"上有政策、下有对策"的规避行为,强 化监管协同与行业自律。 非车险业务涵盖领域广、标的差异大,部分险企可能通过"拆分险种""调整保险责任"等隐蔽方式变相逃 避监管,或在手续费核算中通过第三方机构"曲线"操作。这就需要监管部门建立穿透式监管机制,依托 大数据实时监控险企条款费率执行情况,对违规行为"零容忍",同时完善行业数据共享平台,统一非车 险业务核算标准,减少监管套利空间。此外,行业协会应发挥自律作用,引导险企签订合规经营公约, 对恶意竞争主体实施联合惩戒。 无论是头部机构通过能力提升夯实盈利基础,还是中小险企依托细分赛道建立差异化优势,核心都在于 回归"保险保障"本源。只有形成"监管发力、行业自律、企业合规"的三方合力,才能让非车险"报行合 一"政策真正落地见效,非车险业务才能真正告别规模导向,成为夯实行业盈利、服务实体经济的核心 支撑,为财险业高质量发展注入精准动能。责任编辑:袁浩 "赔本赚吆喝"的竞争模式不仅 ...
加快推进中国资本市场高水平制度型开放|资本市场
清华金融评论· 2025-09-03 10:18
Core Viewpoint - Accelerating the high-level institutional opening of China's capital market is essential for achieving high-quality development, emphasizing that "post-border rules are more important than border opening" [3][4][5]. Group 1: Significance of Institutional Opening - Institutional opening represents a new phase of China's opening-up, differing significantly from traditional commodity and factor flow openings [8][9]. - High-level institutional opening is necessary for building a socialist market economy, enhancing resource allocation efficiency, and supporting high-quality economic development [11]. - It is crucial for advancing the internationalization of the RMB and mitigating external shocks, thereby enhancing the attractiveness of RMB assets to foreign investors [12]. Group 2: Principles for Advancing Institutional Opening - The opening should follow the principles of "taking the initiative, facing international standards, being rooted in local conditions, focusing on market needs, promoting overall progress, and prioritizing safety" [14][13]. - Emphasizing the importance of understanding local conditions to avoid the pitfalls of blindly adopting foreign systems [17][18]. - The process should be market-driven, ensuring that there is demand, institutional capability, and regulatory oversight [19]. Group 3: Pathways for Stock Market Opening - The stock market is a key area for institutional opening, requiring improvements in issuance, trading, investment, and securities firms [22][23]. - Support for Chinese companies to list abroad and for foreign companies to list in China is essential for internationalization [24][25]. - Enhancements in the registration system and merger and acquisition processes are necessary to facilitate market activity [26][27]. Group 4: Pathways for Bond Market Opening - The bond market requires improvements in issuance, investment, and investor protection mechanisms [37][38]. - Enhancing the information disclosure mechanism and rating system is vital for increasing foreign investor confidence [39][40]. - Expanding the channels for foreign investment in RMB bonds and improving the legal framework for bondholder meetings and trustee management is necessary [43][44]. Group 5: Risk Prevention in Institutional Opening - The process of institutional opening must address risks such as institutional mismatch, information leakage, external shocks, malicious attacks, and financial sanctions [47][48]. - Emphasizing the importance of national security and the need for robust monitoring and regulatory frameworks to mitigate these risks [50][51][52]. - Developing a comprehensive response plan to potential financial attacks and enhancing the resilience of the financial system against sanctions is crucial [53][54]. Group 6: Conclusion - The high-level institutional opening of the capital market is vital for supporting economic development and enhancing market stability and competitiveness [56][57]. - A systematic approach is required to identify and address institutional weaknesses while ensuring that safety is prioritized throughout the opening process [58].