每周，"合规周报"会盘点上一周国内外人工智能、互联网平台治理、科技竞争上值得关注的动态。 8月23日，国家发展改革委、市场监管总局、国家网信办联合起草的《互联网平台价格行为规则（征求 意见稿）》（下文简称《行为规则》）对外公开征求意见。《行为规则》对经营者的自主定价权、价格 标示行为、价格竞争行为、消费者价格权益保护与监督机制等进行规定，有效回应了平台经济领域的热 点问题。 具体内容方面，《行为规则》保障经营者自主定价权，平台经营者不得违反电子商务法第三十五条规 定，采取限制流量、屏蔽店铺、下架商品或者服务等措施，对平台内经营者的价格行为进行不合理限制 或者附加不合理条件。 监管治理 1 三部门拟规范平台定价机制，涉及"大数据杀熟"等问题 针对实践中频发的"大数据杀熟""算法歧视"等问题，《行为规则》也进行了规定。平台经营者、平台内 经营者如没有正当理由，不得在消费者不知情的情况下，对同一商品或服务在同等交易条件下设置不同 的价格或收费标准。 2 强化直播电商乱象治理，"东北雨姐"再被点名 8月22日，国家市场监督管理总局局长罗文在"高质量完成'十四五'规划"系列主题新闻发布会上表示， 流量优先、算法滥用、竞 ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the evolution of human-machine communication, emphasizing the need for humans to prepare for a future where machines can decode human emotions and expressions [1][6] - The book "The Rules of Human-Machine Communication" by John Maeda explores the philosophical implications of this evolution, highlighting the dual background of the author as both an artist and a programmer [3][4] Group 1: Human-Machine Interaction - The book outlines the characteristics of intelligent machines, noting their ability to perform repetitive tasks tirelessly and the exponential growth of data and computing power that enhances their capabilities [5] - It emphasizes the distinction between machine intelligence and human emotions, stating that machines currently lack the ability to understand human feelings and subconscious [5][6] Group 2: Communication Paradigms - Human communication is categorized into three dimensions: syntax (information transfer), semantics (intent understanding), and pragmatics (emotional resonance), with AI currently excelling in the first two [6] - Research indicates that when AI dialogue systems achieve a 63% match in pragmatic communication, human trust in these systems increases significantly [6] Group 3: Ethical Considerations - The article raises concerns about algorithmic bias, illustrating how even a small percentage of bias in training data can lead to significant systemic discrimination after multiple iterations [6] - It questions the need for a new form of "mechanical empathy" as AI systems begin to mimic human language behaviors, suggesting that this transformation will redefine human identity [6]

Core Viewpoint - The rapid increase in internet-related civil and commercial disputes, particularly in areas like live streaming sales and paid content, poses challenges in balancing user rights protection and platform development [1] Group 1: Trends in Internet Disputes - The number of internet-related civil and commercial disputes has significantly increased, with cases rising from over 200 in 2022 to around 700 in the following year [3] - Common types of disputes include information network sales contract disputes, product liability disputes, and network service contract disputes, often arising from issues like fraud, product quality, and service cancellations [3] Group 2: Responsibilities of Platforms - Platforms are expected to actively assume both platform and social responsibilities, ensuring consumer protection through rigorous vetting of merchants and maintaining adequate compensation funds for high-risk products [4] - The courts aim to balance user rights and platform development by correctly applying laws such as the Civil Code and the E-commerce Law, while considering the unique characteristics of the digital platform industry [4] Group 3: Live Streaming Sales Disputes - The number of consumer disputes related to live streaming sales is on the rise, with a diverse range of products involved, reflecting an increasing consumer demand in this sector [7] - In live streaming sales, merchants have a heightened duty of care, and platforms must adhere to a fault liability principle to determine responsibility [8] Group 4: Regulation of Digital Platforms - Courts can regulate digital platform operations by properly adjudicating cases related to new transaction models, combating infringement, and providing judicial guidance through typical case publications [11] - The judiciary aims to establish clear rules for new types of disputes arising from digital platforms, such as data ownership and algorithm regulation [11] Group 5: Competition and Legal Framework - "Involution" competition can lead to resource waste and a focus on short-term results over long-term innovation, necessitating judicial oversight to ensure fair competition [12] - Courts should apply laws like the Anti-Monopoly Law and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law to maintain fairness in competitive practices [12]