Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard University regarding the admission of international students, highlighting the ideological battle between right and left in the U.S. [1] Group 1: Background - The conflict stems from student protests against U.S. support for Israel, leading the Trump administration to accuse these movements of anti-Semitism and to impose restrictions on universities, including Harvard [4] - The Trump administration froze $2.6 billion in research funding to Harvard, which is significant given that Harvard's total revenue for 2024 is projected at $6.5 billion and its expenses at $6.4 billion [4] - Harvard's international students contribute over $300 million annually in tuition, making the administration's decision to revoke its ability to enroll international students impactful [4] Group 2: Ideological Divisions - The article identifies three core ideological conflicts shaping American society: globalism vs. nationalism, liberalism vs. conservatism, and elitism vs. populism [5][6][11] - Globalists advocate for U.S. involvement in international affairs and multiculturalism, while nationalists prioritize national interests and border control [7] - Liberals focus on individual rights and social justice, contrasting with conservatives who emphasize traditional values and limited government [10] - The rise of populism, exemplified by Trump, challenges the established elite, leading to a polarized information ecosystem where both sides have increasingly divergent views on facts [12] Group 3: Political Dynamics - The article notes that the Democratic Party is reflecting on its disconnect with ordinary citizens, as many feel alienated by the party's focus on diversity and identity politics [14] - Trump's support among Asian and Hispanic voters has increased, indicating a shift in political dynamics as these groups react against extreme policies [15] - The U.S. constitutional system is described as a balancing mechanism that encourages coexistence rather than the complete victory of one side over the other [15][16]

2007年出生的演员黄杨钿甜因戴价值230万天价耳环而引发广泛关注，她在娱乐圈的发展与其家境被认 为有极大关联。同样因家庭背景而获益的另一事件，则是此前"协和4+4"的新闻中，作为4年速成医学博 士受益者的董袭莹。我们该如何理解这一状况？ 与此同时，在网友对"二代"的家庭进行"深扒"的过程中，也会存在诞生一些新的谣言，进而出现如#董 某外公为外籍院士米耀荣系谣言#的辟谣信息 。那么，我们又该如何理解在这些热点新闻出现时相伴而 生的"谣言"？ 从精英主义到家长主义的社会 如今在各个领域中，二代的现象越来越多。例如演艺圈中不乏星二代：陈奕迅的女儿出道当歌手，陈凯 歌的儿子成为演员；更不乏富二代：马伯骞、虞书欣、姚安娜、蒋一侨等都以富二代人设为人所知。家 庭，成为了许多令人瞩目的公众人物背后最大的托举力量。在《父母格差："拼家长"时代的冲击》一书 中，作者志水宏吉谈到，当下世界都在从精英主义（也叫优绩主义）渐渐地过渡到家长主义，这一改变 对中国社会来说也有参考意义。 精英主义社会的公式是：优绩=能力+努力。 精英主义的理念强调个人的能力和努力最重要。每个人拥有的能力和他们一路积累的努力组合起来的结 果就是"个人的优 ...