Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the findings of the "2025 World Emotional Health Report," highlighting the increasing emotional struggles faced by individuals compared to a decade ago, including issues of loneliness and the impact of meritocracy on societal perceptions [4][15]. Group 1: Emotional Health Trends - Overall, negative emotions remain high globally, with worry (39%) and stress (37%) being the most prevalent, followed by physical pain (32%), sadness (26%), and anger (22%) [17]. - Although worry levels have decreased by 1% compared to the pandemic peak, they are still 5% higher than in 2014 and nearly 10% higher than in 2006 [18]. - Positive emotions have remained stable, with 73% of respondents reporting feelings of joy or laughter and 72% feeling well-rested, showing little change over the past decade [22]. Group 2: Gender and Age Differences - Both men and women are experiencing negative emotions more than ever, with women reporting higher levels of anger, sadness, anxiety, and stress, particularly during the pandemic [19]. - Young adults (ages 15-49) are more likely to feel daily anger, a trend that worsened during the pandemic and has not improved significantly [23]. - Older adults (50+) report higher levels of sadness and worry, while younger individuals have seen a slight decrease in these feelings [23]. Group 3: The Role of Peace in Emotional Health - There is a significant connection between peace, health, and emotional well-being, with negative emotions exacerbated in regions experiencing conflict or instability [24]. - Countries with ongoing conflicts report the highest levels of anger and worry, with 70% of individuals in Sierra Leone experiencing physical pain [25]. - The World Health Organization recognizes peace as a determinant of health, indicating that the absence of peace can increase stress and negatively impact health outcomes [26].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard University regarding the admission of international students, highlighting the ideological battle between right and left in the U.S. [1] Group 1: Background - The conflict stems from student protests against U.S. support for Israel, leading the Trump administration to accuse these movements of anti-Semitism and to impose restrictions on universities, including Harvard [4] - The Trump administration froze $2.6 billion in research funding to Harvard, which is significant given that Harvard's total revenue for 2024 is projected at $6.5 billion and its expenses at $6.4 billion [4] - Harvard's international students contribute over $300 million annually in tuition, making the administration's decision to revoke its ability to enroll international students impactful [4] Group 2: Ideological Divisions - The article identifies three core ideological conflicts shaping American society: globalism vs. nationalism, liberalism vs. conservatism, and elitism vs. populism [5][6][11] - Globalists advocate for U.S. involvement in international affairs and multiculturalism, while nationalists prioritize national interests and border control [7] - Liberals focus on individual rights and social justice, contrasting with conservatives who emphasize traditional values and limited government [10] - The rise of populism, exemplified by Trump, challenges the established elite, leading to a polarized information ecosystem where both sides have increasingly divergent views on facts [12] Group 3: Political Dynamics - The article notes that the Democratic Party is reflecting on its disconnect with ordinary citizens, as many feel alienated by the party's focus on diversity and identity politics [14] - Trump's support among Asian and Hispanic voters has increased, indicating a shift in political dynamics as these groups react against extreme policies [15] - The U.S. constitutional system is described as a balancing mechanism that encourages coexistence rather than the complete victory of one side over the other [15][16]

Core Viewpoint - The phenomenon of "second-generation" individuals in various fields, particularly in the entertainment industry, is increasingly prominent, with family background playing a significant role in their success [1][2][3] Group 1: Eliteism vs. Parentalism - The formula for an elitist society is: Merit = Ability + Effort, emphasizing individual capability and hard work as the main determinants of success [2] - The transition from elitism to parentalism indicates that while personal ability and effort remain important, they are heavily influenced by family conditions, wealth, and parental expectations [2][3] Group 2: Impact of Family Wealth - The parentalism formula is: Choice = Wealth + Expectation, where parents' resources significantly shape the educational and career choices available to their children [3] - The disparity in opportunities is highlighted by the fact that some individuals, like Dong Xiying, have access to prestigious educational paths due to their family wealth, while the majority do not have similar options [4] Group 3: Rumors and Public Perception - The emergence of rumors surrounding wealthy families, such as those of Dong Xiying and Huang Yangtian, reflects societal attitudes and the public's desire for transparency regarding wealth and privilege [7][9] - The importance of an event and its lack of transparency contribute to the proliferation of rumors, as seen in the cases of Huang Yangtian's expensive earrings and the scrutiny of her family's wealth [8][9] Group 4: Social Commentary on Wealth Disparity - The narrative of past celebrities overcoming adversity contrasts sharply with the current trend where fans are more attracted to the "rich second-generation" image, indicating a shift in societal values [4] - The disparity in educational and career opportunities is further emphasized by the notion that only a small portion of individuals can benefit from the increased choices available, while most are left with limited options [4][9]