Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the dedication and innovative approach of Chen Gong, a prominent figure in the disciplinary inspection and supervision system in Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, showcasing his commitment to tackling complex cases and mentoring younger colleagues [1][2]. Group 1: Professional Background - Chen Gong has over 20 years of experience in the disciplinary inspection field, starting his career in December 2006 and joining the Zhenjiang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection in April 2008 [1]. - He was recognized as a national advanced worker in the disciplinary inspection system in September 2022 [1]. Group 2: Case Handling Approach - Chen Gong's motto is "the harder the case, the more determined to tackle it," which reflects his proactive attitude towards challenging investigations [2]. - In a notable case from 2013, he worked tirelessly for 89 days, living at the investigation site to uncover critical evidence against a corrupt state-owned enterprise official [4]. - He successfully established a comprehensive operational process for handling cases of detention, which was implemented in Zhenjiang after the establishment of the Municipal Supervisory Committee in January 2018 [4]. Group 3: Innovation and Learning - Chen Gong emphasizes continuous learning and innovation, having developed a "room + county" joint case handling model to optimize resources and enhance practical learning for grassroots staff [5]. - He actively engages in professional development, often studying various subjects related to his work, including finance and law, to better equip his team for complex cases [6][7]. Group 4: Mentorship and Team Development - Chen Gong is known for his hands-on mentorship style, guiding younger colleagues through difficult cases and sharing his extensive knowledge [8]. - His leadership has resulted in many of his mentees becoming key figures in their respective departments, demonstrating the effectiveness of his training approach [9][10].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the dedication and effective strategies of Li Wei, a seasoned anti-corruption investigator, in tackling significant cases of misconduct among public officials, showcasing his commitment to justice and the welfare of the community [1][2][3][4][5]. Group 1: Case Handling and Strategies - Li Wei has successfully handled multiple high-profile cases, demonstrating his ability to confront powerful adversaries and dismantle corrupt networks [1][2]. - He employs a unique approach by engaging with investigation subjects through informal conversations to build trust and encourage cooperation, leading to successful outcomes [2][4]. - His work ethic is characterized by long hours and a commitment to resolving cases promptly, often working late into the night [2][3]. Group 2: Personal Sacrifice and Health - Li Wei's intense dedication to his work has taken a toll on his health, leading to a serious medical condition that required significant recovery time [2][3]. - Despite his health challenges, he prioritized case progress over personal well-being, reflecting his deep commitment to his role [3]. Group 3: Mentorship and Training - Li Wei actively mentors younger colleagues, tailoring training programs to enhance their skills in investigation and legal knowledge, thereby fostering a new generation of capable investigators [4][5]. - His approach to mentorship emphasizes the importance of sharing experiences and knowledge to strengthen the overall effectiveness of the team [4][5]. Group 4: Adaptation to New Roles - In 2024, Li Wei transitioned to a new role as a巡察专员, quickly adapting his extensive experience in supervision and enforcement to develop effective inspection strategies [5]. - He focuses on identifying political deviations and problem-solving within his new responsibilities, maintaining his commitment to integrity and justice [5].

Core Insights - The National Supervisory Commission reported a total of 314,400 complaints received from January to September 2025, with 996,000 being accusations and complaints [4] - A total of 1,976,000 problem clues were processed, leading to 789,000 cases being filed, including 90 provincial and ministerial level officials [4] - Disciplinary actions were taken against 677,000 individuals, with 502,000 receiving party disciplinary actions and 220,000 receiving administrative penalties [4] Summary by Categories - **Complaints and Reports** - 314,400 complaints were received, with 996,000 being accusations [4] - **Case Handling** - 1,976,000 problem clues were processed, resulting in 789,000 cases filed [4] - Specific breakdown of cases includes 90 provincial level officials, 3,704 departmental level officials, and 31,000 county level officials [4] - **Disciplinary Actions** - 677,000 individuals were disciplined, including 41 provincial level officials and 29,530 departmental level officials [4] - 502,000 received party disciplinary actions and 220,000 received administrative penalties [4] - **Criticism and Education** - 1,376,000 individuals were subjected to criticism and education, with 688,000 under the first form of criticism [4] - The second form accounted for 556,000 individuals, while the third and fourth forms each accounted for 66,000 individuals [4] - **Bribery Investigations** - 25,000 bribery cases were filed, with 3,127 individuals transferred to the procuratorate [4]

Core Points - The national disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies received a total of 3.144 million petitions from January to September 2025, with 996,000 being complaints and accusations [1] - A total of 1.976 million problem clues were handled, leading to 789,000 cases being filed, including 90 at the provincial and ministerial level, 3,704 at the departmental level, 31,000 at the county level, and 106,000 at the township level [1] - Disciplinary actions were taken against 677,000 individuals, with 502,000 receiving party disciplinary actions and 220,000 receiving administrative penalties [1] Summary by Sections Disciplinary Actions - 789,000 cases were filed, with specific breakdowns by rank: 90 provincial and ministerial officials, 3,704 departmental officials, 31,000 county officials, and 106,000 township officials [1] - Disciplinary actions included 41 provincial and ministerial officials, 2,953 departmental officials, 24,000 county officials, 84,000 township officials, and 90,000 general officials, along with 476,000 individuals from rural areas and enterprises [1] Handling of Petitions - The agencies processed 3.144 million petitions, with 996,000 being complaints and accusations [1] - A total of 1.976 million problem clues were addressed [1] Application of "Four Forms" - The "Four Forms" approach was applied to criticize and handle 1.376 million individuals, with 688,000 handled under the first form (50%), 556,000 under the second form (40.4%), and 66,000 under the third and fourth forms (4.8% each) [2] - The approach emphasizes simultaneous investigation of bribery and corruption, with 25,000 cases filed against bribers and 3,127 cases referred to the procuratorate [5]

Core Points - Zhao Jiang, a deputy director of the Discipline Inspection Commission in Liupanshui, Guizhou, has been actively involved in handling over 100 cases of disciplinary violations and has recovered more than 60 million yuan in economic losses [1][2][4] - Zhao faced initial challenges in adapting to the new requirements of the discipline inspection and supervision work after transferring from the procuratorate, but he quickly improved his skills through extensive study and practical experience [2][3] - He emphasizes the importance of thorough investigation and the need to address public grievances, demonstrating a commitment to justice and accountability [4][5] Group 1 - Zhao Jiang has participated in over 100 cases and guided the handling of more than 500 problem clues, recovering over 60 million yuan in losses [1] - He initially experienced "ability anxiety" but overcame it by studying extensively and seeking guidance from colleagues [2][3] - Zhao's dedication to his work is evident in his willingness to work long hours and his proactive approach to case handling [3][4] Group 2 - Zhao Jiang has faced various challenges, including threats and attempts to influence investigations, but he remains steadfast in upholding principles and laws [5][6] - He employs innovative methods and collaborates with multiple departments to gather evidence and ensure thorough investigations [6][7] - Zhao believes in the dual role of discipline inspection personnel as both enforcers of the law and as facilitators for the rehabilitation of errant officials [8][9]

Core Viewpoint - The Guizhou Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision held the 2025 "Discipline Inspection and Supervision Open Day" to enhance transparency and communication with special supervisors, showcasing the province's anti-corruption efforts and achievements since the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [1][2]. Group 1 - The event included a visit to the Guizhou Provincial Discipline Inspection and Supervision Work Exhibition Hall, where special supervisors learned about the province's recent anti-corruption achievements and political ecology improvements [1][2]. - The meeting featured discussions led by Guizhou Provincial Commission officials, focusing on the continuous deepening of the Party's innovative theories, high-quality political supervision, and a "zero tolerance" approach to corruption [2]. - Special supervisors provided feedback and suggestions on advancing anti-corruption efforts and addressing local corruption issues, emphasizing the importance of focusing on grassroots management and public welfare [2][3]. Group 2 - The Guizhou Provincial Discipline Inspection and Supervision agencies have prioritized the role of special supervisors as a key measure for high-quality development in discipline inspection work, facilitating their participation in various oversight and training activities [3].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the dedication and commitment of Wu Wei in the anti-corruption efforts within the Guizhou Province, highlighting his role in safeguarding the interests of the public and addressing corruption at various levels [1][2][4]. - Wu Wei has been involved in over 100 cases of disciplinary violations, recovering approximately 280 million yuan for the state, showcasing the effectiveness of his work in the anti-corruption sector [1][2]. - The article illustrates Wu Wei's approach to handling cases, which combines strict enforcement of regulations with a compassionate understanding of the individuals involved, reflecting a balanced methodology in his work [5][7]. Group 2 - Wu Wei's early experiences in the anti-corruption system shaped his commitment to protecting vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and children, as seen in his investigation of a case involving misappropriation of welfare funds [3][4]. - The article details specific cases led by Wu Wei, including the recovery of misused funds intended for student nutrition, demonstrating his proactive measures in ensuring accountability within educational institutions [4][8]. - Wu Wei's resilience is highlighted through his dedication to his work, often prioritizing it over personal health and family commitments, which underscores the demanding nature of the anti-corruption role [8][9].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of maintaining the interests of the people and the integrity of the Party, highlighting the role of disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies in combating corruption and misconduct at the grassroots level [1] - The approach includes breaking regional limitations and personal interference in supervision, promoting a collaborative and efficient supervision network through mechanisms like county-level coordination and cross-checking [1] - There is a focus on enhancing the professional skills of disciplinary inspection personnel through systematic training and practical experience, ensuring they are well-equipped to handle cases effectively [1] Group 2 - The strategy involves increasing case handling efforts by analyzing various channels for problem clues, particularly in areas like administrative law enforcement and rural collective asset management [2] - A system of leadership accountability for key cases and regular quality assessments of case handling is implemented to ensure compliance with regulations and enhance the overall quality of investigations [2] - The goal is to create a strong deterrent against corruption at the grassroots level, particularly targeting "fly and ant corruption" [2] Group 3 - The practice of using case analysis to promote reforms is emphasized, with a focus on understanding the underlying causes of corruption, including ideological roots and regulatory gaps [3] - The development of "case guidelines" aims to provide reference for future investigations and promote systemic improvements in response to identified issues [3] - Educational initiatives are undertaken to raise awareness among local party members and officials about the consequences of misconduct, reinforcing the importance of integrity and accountability [3]

Core Points - Huang Feilong, the director of the Eighth Investigation and Inspection Office of the Discipline Inspection Commission of Liupanshui City, has been recognized multiple times for his contributions to anti-corruption efforts in Guizhou Province and nationally [1][2][3] - He has handled over 60 serious disciplinary cases involving party members and has recovered more than 300 million yuan through investigations [2][3] Group 1 - Huang Feilong emphasizes the importance of integrity and justice in his work, stating that personal relationships should not interfere with fairness [3][5] - During the anti-crime campaign from 2018 to 2020, he played a key role in investigating a criminal organization that had been active for over 20 years, which involved high-ranking officials [3][5] - Huang's commitment to his work is evident as he often sacrifices weekends and holidays to ensure thorough investigations [2][3] Group 2 - Huang Feilong faced significant challenges while investigating a case involving a former police deputy director, demonstrating his resolve to confront difficult situations [5][6] - He successfully gathered critical evidence against the deputy director, leading to his expulsion from the party and a six-year prison sentence for bribery [6][7] - Huang's approach to investigations includes careful planning and risk assessment, especially when dealing with potentially dangerous situations [7][9] Group 3 - Huang Feilong prioritizes the interests of the public in his work, often putting aside personal commitments to address urgent cases [10][11] - He employs effective communication strategies to gain the trust of the community, which is crucial for gathering evidence [11][12] - His dedication to his role has led to significant outcomes, including the recovery of over 6 million yuan in compensation for affected villagers [12]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of higher education in supporting the political and strategic goals of the nation, highlighting the need for strict supervision and integrity within educational institutions [2][4][5] - Higher education is identified as a crucial political project, tasked with cultivating talent that supports the Communist Party and the socialist system, ensuring alignment with the Party's educational policies [4][6] - The article stresses the necessity for higher education to respond to public demands for equitable and high-quality education, advocating for reforms to enhance educational resources [4][8] Group 2 - The role of higher education as a strategic engine for development is underscored, with a focus on its contribution to national technological independence and innovation [5][10] - Political supervision is highlighted as a primary responsibility of disciplinary inspection institutions in higher education, ensuring adherence to the Party's directives and educational policies [6][7] - The need for a robust mechanism to prevent corruption and ensure accountability in areas affecting students and faculty, such as admissions and funding, is emphasized [8][9] Group 3 - The article discusses the importance of aligning disciplinary inspection work with national strategic needs, ensuring that educational institutions contribute effectively to national goals [10][11] - It calls for the establishment of a comprehensive system for power operation and risk prevention within educational governance, enhancing oversight in critical areas like research funding and academic integrity [11][12] - The necessity for continuous improvement in the capabilities and effectiveness of disciplinary inspection teams is stressed, advocating for higher standards and rigorous training [12][13]