Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolution of economic thought through paradigm shifts and integrations, emphasizing that each theoretical change in economics occurs through these two stages, which is distinct from the natural sciences [19]. Group 1: Paradigm Shifts in Economic Thought - The first paradigm shift in economics occurred in the 1770s, marked by the publication of Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" in 1776, which transitioned the focus from "wealth management" to "wealth production" [20]. - The second paradigm shift took place in the 1870s with the rise of the marginal utility school, which challenged the classical economics' labor theory of value and introduced the "subjective value" paradigm [43]. Group 2: Paradigm Integrations in Economic Thought - The first paradigm integration occurred in the 1840s with John Stuart Mill's "Principles of Political Economy," which combined the "wealth management" and "wealth production" paradigms into a complementary theoretical framework [32]. - The second paradigm integration happened in the late 19th century with Alfred Marshall's "Principles of Economics," which synthesized classical economics' "objective value" and the marginal utility school's "subjective value" into what is known as "neoclassical economics" [51][52].

Group 1 - The acquisition plan of Three Squirrels to acquire Love Snacks has been terminated after 8 months, with a deal value of 200 million yuan [1] - The announcement indicated that the parties could not reach an agreement on core terms, leading to the decision to terminate the acquisition [1][2] - Following the termination, Three Squirrels signed a deep strategic cooperation agreement with Snack Selection [1] Group 2 - The termination of acquisitions is common in the A-share market, often due to disagreements on terms or conditions [2][3] - The decision to terminate the acquisition can be seen as a responsible choice for both parties, allowing them to seek better opportunities [4][20] Group 3 - For Love Snacks, being acquired could have been a favorable outcome given the competitive industry landscape, providing opportunities for shareholders [7] - For Three Squirrels, the termination is also a "optimal solution," potentially due to disagreements on valuation, market changes, or strategic shifts [8][19] - Love Snacks' valuation has been a point of contention, with significant disagreements reported during negotiations [9][12] Group 4 - The snack industry is entering a new phase of operational growth, moving beyond the initial rapid expansion and consolidation [21][22] - The focus is shifting towards operational efficiency and profitability, as seen in other industries like tea beverages [25][27] - The competitive landscape is evolving, with leading brands solidifying their positions while second-tier brands may face challenges [27][30] Group 5 - The future growth of the snack industry will depend on effectively managing supply chains and understanding consumer demographics [30][33] - Successful businesses in the snack sector will need to prioritize high-quality products and customer retention strategies to thrive in a saturated market [33][34]