Workflow
联邦制
icon
Search documents
政局剧变一年后 叙利亚形势如何
在经济方面,叙过渡政府通过从阿塞拜疆、卡塔尔、俄罗斯等国获取天然气和石油,使叙利亚电力供应 得到明显改善。 谋求外交"突破口" 叙过渡政府频频与各方接触,寻求推进和改善与地区国家以及美俄等方关系。 自去年12月8日政局剧变以来,叙利亚过渡政府对内谋求推动各方力量和解、巩固自身政权,对外积极 寻求外交突破、争取获得国际认可。 专家认为,一年来,虽然在内政和外交方面均取得了一定进展,但叙过渡政府依然面临安全局势脆弱、 反恐形势严峻、重建进展缓慢等挑战,过渡进程"如走钢丝"。 寻求稳固政权 内政方面,叙利亚过渡政府在政治、安全和经济上采取了一系列措施,以期推进国内政治进程,稳定国 内局势,稳固自身政权。 在政治领域,叙过渡政府通过召开全国对话会议、制定"宪法宣言"和举行立法机构选举等政治过渡步 骤,充实执政框架。 在安全领域,叙过渡政府推进不同武装力量间的停火与和解。过渡政府与叙库尔德武装主导的"叙利亚 民主力量"签署协议、同意将"叙利亚民主力量"整合进国家机构,与叙利亚德鲁兹派签订实现停火的协 议,还推动"叙利亚沙姆解放武装"和土耳其支持的"叙利亚国民军"下属武装派别改旗易帜、整体编入军 队。 图为日前拍摄的叙利 ...
叙利亚政权:坚决反对联邦制或任何形式分裂
news flash· 2025-07-09 22:03
Core Viewpoint - The Syrian government welcomes any measures taken by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) that promote national unity and territorial integrity, while firmly opposing federalism or any form of division [1] Group 1: Government's Position - The Syrian government acknowledges the internal challenges faced by the SDF but emphasizes that any delays in executing agreements do not align with national interests and complicate the situation [1] - The government insists on extending national institutions, including public services, health, education, and local administration, to the northeastern regions controlled by the SDF to ensure basic services for local populations and enhance social stability [1] Group 2: Meetings and Agreements - Syrian government leader Ahmad Shara met with U.S. Special Envoy for Syria Thomas Barak in Damascus, indicating international engagement in the Syrian issue [1] - Reports indicate that SDF leader Mazloum Abdi also met with Shara in Damascus on the same day, with Barak present, highlighting ongoing dialogues between the parties [1] - The SDF, led by the Kurdish People's Protection Units, currently controls significant areas in northeastern Syria, including major oil and food production regions [1] - In March, the SDF signed an agreement with the Syrian government to integrate into national institutions, with some limited progress made since then [1]
阿里错失良机 马云对元老“开刀”
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-03 06:04
Core Insights - Alibaba has announced significant management changes alongside its FY2025 annual report, with key executives like Cainiao CEO Wan Lin and Alibaba Entertainment Chairman Fan Luyuan stepping down [1] - The number of Alibaba partners has decreased to 17, down by more than half from its peak, indicating a strategic slimming down amid ongoing challenges [2] - The company has struggled with strategic direction since Jack Ma's departure, facing intense competition in e-commerce and cloud computing, and has been criticized for its inability to adapt quickly to market changes [2][6] Management Changes - The recent management reshuffle includes the exit of nine partners, including notable figures like Peng Lei and Dai Shan, reflecting a shift in leadership dynamics [2] - The appointment of Wu Yongming as CEO signals a change in strategy, emphasizing a transition from a platform giant to a diversified technology group [8][9] Strategic Challenges - Alibaba has faced multiple strategic missteps, including neglecting its core e-commerce platform and failing to capitalize on emerging market trends, leading to significant losses in market share to competitors like Pinduoduo and Douyin [5][6] - The company's attempts at restructuring, such as the split of its various business units, have not yielded the expected results, leading to operational inefficiencies and a lack of cohesive strategy [12][16] Future Directions - Alibaba plans to invest more in AI and cloud infrastructure, with a commitment to exceed the total investment of the past decade within the next three years [9] - The company is moving away from traditional retail strategies, as evidenced by the divestment of underperforming assets like Hema and Intime, and is focusing on online and membership models [11] Organizational Structure - The historical reliance on a decentralized, federated structure has proven ineffective for Alibaba, which is better suited to a centralized management approach [12][16] - The recent leadership changes aim to streamline operations and enhance collaboration across business units, countering the fragmentation caused by previous restructuring efforts [17][18]