Core Viewpoint - The trend of companies initiating stock reforms earlier in the primary market raises concerns about the lack of clarity and planning in the process [1][6][12]. Group 1: Stock Reform Timing - Companies are increasingly starting stock reforms without having a clear plan or timeline for their IPO [2][10]. - Historically, stock reforms were closely tied to IPO preparations, but now there seems to be a disconnect, with some companies rushing into reforms prematurely [6][20]. Group 2: Due Diligence and Awareness - Investors should conduct thorough due diligence to assess whether a company is genuinely prepared for an IPO or merely using stock reform as a tactic to buy time [14][32]. - There is a warning against assuming that a stock reform automatically indicates a forthcoming IPO, as many companies may not be ready for such a step [13][35]. Group 3: Financial Implications - The treatment of buyback agreements during stock reforms can vary significantly, affecting the net assets reported by companies [25][29]. - Companies may not need to clear buyback agreements before stock reforms, which can lead to misleading financial representations [19][21]. Group 4: Market Conditions - The current market conditions suggest that completing a stock reform does not necessarily correlate with compliance or readiness for an IPO [36][41]. - Many pre-IPO investments have failed, indicating that stock reform alone is not a reliable indicator of future success [39][42].

Group 1 - The core idea of the article emphasizes the importance of stock reform for companies aiming to go public, likening it to a "health check and rectification" process that addresses historical financial and management issues [1] - Stock reform involves clarifying the company's financial status and resolving past problems, such as incomplete capital contributions and unclear accounting records, to avoid issues during audits [1][3] - The overall process of stock reform includes preparation, self-assessment, due diligence, and compliance with regulations, ensuring that the company is ready for the public offering [1][6] Group 2 - In the preparation phase, selecting the right intermediaries, such as accountants and financial advisors, is crucial for identifying and addressing historical issues within the company [2][3] - Companies should conduct internal assessments before engaging external intermediaries to understand their own issues and prepare for targeted solutions during due diligence [2] - During due diligence, companies must focus on verifying asset existence, liabilities, and the legitimacy of past capital contributions to ensure a clean financial slate [3][4] Group 3 - The design of the reform plan should prioritize retaining essential assets while eliminating non-core or unprofitable segments, ensuring that the company is streamlined for profitability [4][5] - Financial records must be thoroughly cleaned up, addressing any discrepancies in capital contributions and ensuring compliance with accounting standards [4][5] - The execution of the reform must follow established procedures, ensuring that all reports and evaluations align and that necessary approvals are obtained [5][6] Group 4 - Compliance and risk management are critical during stock reform, with each company's approach varying based on its structure, such as state-owned or private enterprises [6][7] - Companies must ensure that their net assets are accurately represented and not artificially inflated, maintaining a buffer for unforeseen expenses [8] - Related party transactions and the use of company funds must be carefully managed to prevent financial misrepresentation and potential legal issues [8]