Workflow
航空安全
icon
Search documents
郑州机场暑运安检:小通道 安全桥
《中国民航报》、中国民航网 记者冯智君 通讯员刘奕扬、王鹏真 报道:8月中旬,为期两个月的暑运 行将尾声,郑州机场千名安检员一直坚守在各个安检通道,利用多年积累的经验,借助于安检设备,检 查出一件件不能携带上飞机的物品,对于老、少等旅客,专业呵护;对于加急旅客,应急安检通道更加 细分,日均有千名左右匆匆而来的旅客,在最后时刻赶上了飞机;对于旅客的行李,不到十秒就能给出 放行与重检的答案;每天保障着4万名旅客通过安全检查,飞向远方。 每日平均600次的蹲下起立 安检区域一条条安检通道,如同一座桥,安检员坚守在一侧的桥头堡,时刻守护着航空安全的大门。 暑运期间,旅客携带大件行李出行托运成为常态,8月13日下午,在值机柜台行李传送带上的X光机的 嗡嗡声中,郑州机场安检站后台行李检查机房的屏幕不断刷新着行李图像,判图员周焕军双眼紧盯屏 幕,手指在键盘上灵活跳跃,面对堆叠的行李物品,她通常要在数秒内完成 "图像解码"。发现疑似不 可托运物品时,指令便迅速传到前台开包间,"您的行李箱侧袋有个装有电池的设备,按规定需开包检 查并随身携带。",前台开包间安检员李义接收指令复查后便通知协助旅客进行开包检查。 据统计,郑州机场行 ...
俄交通部:已在安-24客机坠毁现场找到“黑匣子”,将送至莫斯科进行解码。
news flash· 2025-07-25 07:45
Group 1 - The Russian Ministry of Transport has located the "black box" at the crash site of the An-24 passenger aircraft [1] - The "black box" will be sent to Moscow for decoding [1]
美国联邦航空管理局负责人:印度航空787航班坠毁事件似乎并非由波音(BA.N)燃油控制单元引起。
news flash· 2025-07-24 18:03
Group 1 - The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) indicated that the crash of the Indian Airlines 787 flight does not appear to be caused by the fuel control unit from Boeing [1]
美国达美航空一名飞行员称,该航司一架飞机上周被迫放弃在北达科塔州的着陆计划,从而避免与一架B-52轰炸机相撞。(ABC News,彭博)
news flash· 2025-07-21 15:13
Group 1 - A Delta Airlines pilot reported that a plane was forced to abandon its landing attempt in North Dakota to avoid a collision with a B-52 bomber [1]
机场附近放风筝,多个航班被干扰,印尼将严查
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-07-20 22:50
Core Viewpoint - The Indonesian government and airlines have issued strict warnings against kite flying near airports, emphasizing the need for law enforcement to address this dangerous behavior [1][3]. Group 1: Impact on Aviation - Kite flying activities near Soekarno-Hatta Airport led to the cancellation or delay of 21 flights within just two days in early July [3]. - The Indonesian National Air Navigation Company has alerted pilots about potential kite interference around the airport [3]. - The Indonesian aviation law prohibits flying kites, drones, or any aerial objects in restricted airspace, with violators facing up to three years in prison or hefty fines [3]. Group 2: Government Response - The Indonesian Minister of Transportation, Budi Karya Sumadi, emphasized the need for better coordination between airports and local governments to prevent disruptions caused by kite flying [3]. - The Minister acknowledged that educating nearby residents about safety will be a long-term process, as changing habits cannot happen overnight [3]. Group 3: Cultural Context - Kite flying is a common recreational activity in Indonesia, especially among children, due to limited economic conditions and available sports facilities [4]. - In Bali and other regions, kite flying is seen as a way to thank deities and pray for a good harvest, while some use it to express political views [4]. - Experts note that concerns about kite-related incidents tend to arise briefly before fading away, indicating that "taming these kites" remains a significant challenge for Indonesia's long-term aviation safety efforts [4].
美联邦航空管理局悄悄说:波音飞机没问题
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-07-14 03:09
Core Viewpoint - The preliminary investigation results of the recent crash of an Air India Boeing 787 have raised questions about why the fuel switches of the aircraft were turned off, leading to engine failure and the subsequent crash, which resulted in over 270 fatalities [1][3][4]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - The Indian Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) reported that both engines' fuel switches were turned off almost simultaneously shortly after takeoff, causing fuel supply interruption and engine shutdown [3][4]. - The AAIB's preliminary report did not clarify how the switches were turned off during flight, but cockpit voice recordings indicated a pilot questioned the action, with the other pilot denying involvement [4][5]. - The aircraft's black boxes have been recovered, and an investigation is ongoing with international assistance to determine the cause of the crash [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - The FAA and Boeing have communicated that the design of the fuel switch lock does not pose a safety issue, and there is no need for airworthiness directives for any Boeing models, including the 787 [1][3]. - Despite a previous FAA recommendation in 2018 to check the fuel cutoff switch locking mechanism, Air India did not conduct the checks as the guidance was non-mandatory [4][5]. Group 3: Expert Opinions - Aviation experts have expressed skepticism about the likelihood of simultaneous accidental activation of both fuel switches, suggesting that pilot error is unlikely based on the available evidence [4][5]. - The investigation is focusing on whether the switches were intentionally turned off and who might have been responsible, as the circumstances surrounding the crash remain unclear [5][6]. Group 4: Public Reaction - Families of the victims have expressed dissatisfaction with the preliminary report, seeking more substantial explanations regarding the crash and its causes [6].
印坠机事故初步调查报告引多方不满,遇难者家属:“一派胡言,无法接受”
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-07-13 22:47
Core Viewpoint - The preliminary investigation report by the Indian Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on the June 12 crash of an Air India Boeing 787 attributes the accident to the fuel supply being cut off to both engines during a critical ascent phase, raising significant concerns among aviation safety experts regarding the plausibility of pilot error [3][5]. Group 1: Accident Details - The crash resulted in 274 fatalities, including 33 ground personnel [1]. - The AAIB report indicates that both fuel switches were simultaneously turned from "on" to "off," leading to the engines losing fuel supply [3]. - The cockpit recordings revealed a conversation between the pilots questioning the fuel switch actions, but the report did not clarify their identities [3]. Group 2: Expert Opinions - Aviation safety experts have expressed disbelief at the report's findings, noting that the design of the Boeing 787's fuel switches requires multiple actions to operate, making accidental activation highly unlikely [3]. - Experts suggest that if the pilots intentionally shut off the fuel supply, such behavior would be considered irrational [3]. Group 3: Reactions to the Report - The report has faced criticism for failing to address the underlying reasons for the fuel switch being turned off, whether due to human error or technical malfunction [5]. - Families of the victims have accused Air India and the Indian government of deflecting blame onto the pilots and obscuring the truth [5]. - The Indian Pilots Association criticized the report for its lack of transparency and professionalism, suggesting a bias against the pilots [6]. Group 4: Regulatory Context - According to international aviation regulations, preliminary accident reports should be released within a month of the incident, with a complete report expected within 12 months [6].
消息人士:美国联邦航空局(FAA)告知航空监管机构,波音飞机上的燃料切换锁没有安全隐患。
news flash· 2025-07-13 20:37
Core Viewpoint - The FAA has informed aviation regulators that there are no safety concerns regarding the fuel switch lock on Boeing aircraft [1] Group 1 - The FAA's assessment indicates that the fuel switch lock issue does not pose a safety risk, which may positively impact Boeing's operational stability and regulatory compliance [1]
印度客机坠毁系燃料供应中断!专家称意外移动开关可能性较低
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-07-12 02:29
Core Insights - The preliminary investigation report by the Indian Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau revealed that the Boeing 787-8 aircraft experienced a dual engine fuel supply cut-off shortly after takeoff, leading to an in-flight engine failure and subsequent crash [1][2] - The crash occurred on June 12, resulting in over 200 fatalities, with only one survivor, an Indian-British man [1][2] - The cockpit voice recording indicated a conversation between the pilots regarding the fuel switch, suggesting potential confusion or miscommunication [1] Group 1 - The fuel supply to both engines was interrupted for approximately 10 seconds, and the switches were reopened shortly after, but the aircraft could not regain sufficient power to stop its descent [1] - The time interval between the closure of the fuel supply switches for both engines was about 1 second, indicating a synchronized failure [1] - The aircraft began its descent before crossing the airport perimeter, highlighting a critical failure in maintaining altitude [1] Group 2 - Aviation experts noted that each engine's fuel supply switch is equipped with a locking mechanism to prevent accidental changes, suggesting that pilot error in moving the switches is unlikely [2] - The Boeing 787, known for its fuel efficiency and long-range capabilities, has faced multiple safety incidents globally since its introduction in late 2011 [2] - Prior to this incident, Boeing had suspended deliveries of the 787 model due to manufacturing defects and disagreements with the FAA regarding inspection methods, although deliveries were later resumed [2]
赤峰机场查获伪3C标识充电宝
Core Viewpoint - The implementation of new regulations by the Civil Aviation Administration of China regarding power banks has led to increased challenges and security concerns at Chifeng Airport, highlighted by an incident where a traveler attempted to use a counterfeit 3C certification label on a non-compliant power bank [1][4]. Group 1: Incident Details - A traveler was caught trying to board a flight with a power bank that had a laser-printed 3C certification label, which was not genuine [4]. - The traveler initially attempted to justify their actions but eventually admitted to the violation when confronted with evidence [4]. - This incident is part of a growing trend where travelers are attempting to bypass regulations by using counterfeit certification labels [4]. Group 2: Security Implications - The actions of travelers attempting to use fake 3C labels pose significant threats to aviation safety and disrupt normal air transport operations [4]. - Some unscrupulous vendors have begun selling counterfeit "3C certification stickers" or offering laser engraving services online, claiming to help travelers make non-compliant power banks appear compliant [4]. Group 3: Response Measures - In response to these challenges, Chifeng Airport is enhancing the training of security personnel to improve their ability to identify counterfeit 3C labels [5]. - The training focuses on equipping security staff with skills to accurately discern the authenticity of certification labels and to understand safety regulations related to power banks [5]. - The airport aims to ensure strict adherence to safety protocols during security checks to maintain a safe and orderly travel environment for passengers [5].