日前，记者跟随检察官来到乐至县石湍镇一处坝坝宴现场回访，掌勺的唐师傅向记者展示了手机里 的"乐至乡厨"小程序——帮工健康证、用餐人数、消毒记录、食品留样等信息以图文形式展现，一目了 然。 据了解，目前"乐至乡厨"小程序已收录332名乡厨信息，完成708场宴席的在线监管。 "根据相关规定，举办超100人宴席的承办者应向所在乡镇（街道）报告，但实践中'先办后报''办而不 报'的情况较为普遍。"检察官介绍，市场监管数据显示，2024年乐至县某镇报告百人以上宴席仅3场， 但经随机询问3名乡厨得知，仅其当年在该镇承办的超百人宴席就超20场，与报告记录的数据明显不 符。 检察官在现场走访中还发现，坝坝宴存在加工操作不规范问题，多数乡厨未严格执行食材溯源、餐具消 毒、食品留样等规定，且全县登记在册的乡厨共计295名，其中116人健康证过期。 全面了解相关情况后，2025年4月，乐至县检察院向相关部门制发检察建议督促整改。为推动建立长效 机制，检察机关多次与市场监管部门沟通协调，助推市场监管部门开发"乐至乡厨"微信小程序，实现乡 厨在线报备宴席规模、地点、时间等信息，平台还能一键上传食材采购票据、餐具消毒及食品留样照 片。针 ...

凤冈县检察院主动邀请水利工程专业技术人员、属地政府分管负责人、当地村委会干部，通过实地走 访、现场勘验、无人机航拍等多种方式查明：东干渠因年久失修，多处出现淤堵、渗漏，其中长达6100 米的沟底存在漏水渗水问题，30多处沟渠垮塌，亟须重新清理、修复。 2025年7月18日，凤冈县检察院向该县水务局依法制发检察建议，建议其切实履行农田水利工程监管职 责，针对黄泥塘水库东干渠存在的沟渠沉陷、渗漏、淤堵等问题，积极争取维修资金、编制专项维修项 目，开展集中专项维修和养护工作，保障东干渠畅通及正常运行；同时，强化与相关部门在维护农田水 利工程正常运行方面的协作配合，建立长效协作机制，明确管护责任主体，加强日常巡查、维修和养 护，确保农田水利工程高效、安全运行。 收到检察建议后，凤冈县水务局高度重视，第一时间研究部署整改落实措施，迅速编制《凤冈县黄泥塘 水库东干渠维修实施方案》，明确维修范围涵盖渠堤修复、淤泥清理、渠道衬砌等重点内容，积极向上 级部门申请并顺利落实维修资金45万余元，对东干渠开展全面维修施工。 2026年1月19日，凤冈县检察院组织水利技术人员、人大代表、政协委员、人民监督员，对修复后的东 干渠运行情况 ...

"河道里的树木、围栏、草料和垃圾都已被彻底清除，少了这些'添堵'的隐患，今年过年，大家伙儿的 心气更顺啦！"近日，在河南省郑州市，记者跟随检察干警来到黄龙岗大桥，对检察机关此前办理的一 起违法侵占河道行政公益诉讼案进行"回头看"，附近居民指着旧貌换新颜的河道，主动上前和记者闲 谈。 黄龙岗大桥位于金水河上游，其两侧河道是保障郑州市区行洪安全的关键区域。据附近居民反映，以 前，河道里栽种的杨树一眼望不到边，垃圾、草料胡乱堆放着，一到汛期，河道的行洪安全更让人"捏 把汗"。 2024年4月8日，该院向负有监管责任的相关行政机关制发检察建议，督促其依法查处占用河道种植树 木、围栏养殖、堆放草料及垃圾等违法行为，消除行洪安全隐患，恢复河道原状。 收到检察建议后，相关行政机关高度重视，迅速组织排查整治。至2024年6月6日，一侧河道内的杨树被 如期采伐，另一侧河道内的杨树、围栏因权属争议纠纷未能消除，整改被暂时搁置。原来，该处河道内 杨树、围栏等系违法行为人张强（化名）于1990年前后承包土地后种植和设置，10年承包期到期后，张 强仍占用河道。2024年4月26日，行政机关向其下发责令限期整改通知书，要求在当年5月31 ...

转自：贵州日报 本报讯（记者 安慧芳）"江口冷水鱼品质本就好，又有各个部门帮着把关，可放心采买。"传统新春佳 节临近，鱼贩林达像往年一样，早早来到铜仁市江口县各养殖基地订购。 江口县被誉为"中国冷水鱼之乡"，冷水鱼年产值达2.12亿元，是当地特色支柱产业。但大多消费者不知 道的是，江口冷水鱼在发展中也曾走过弯路，部分存在无证养殖、未建立投入品记录等问题，让这份好 生态带来的红利蒙上阴影。 2025年3月，江口县人民检察院通过省农产品质量安全追溯平台，发现该县某水产公司抽检的鲇鱼中恩 诺沙星含量超过安全限值这一线索，经初步调查后以行政公益诉讼立案。 该院邀请有关专家全程协助，经调查核实，认为无证养殖脱离监管，投入品无追溯易引发违规用药风 险，未检测水产品流入市场及病害鱼处置不当，既破坏生态又危害消费者健康。 同年4月28日，江口县人民检察院向负有监管职责的县农业农村局制发检察建议，督促全面排查行业问 题、限期整改。但其未在期限内书面回复整改情况，经跟踪观察，仅1家企业完善相关台账，公共利益 仍持续受损。 为此，根据有关管辖规定，江口县人民检察院遂将案件移送至碧江区检察院审查起诉。碧江区检察院于 同年8月14日依 ...

Core Insights - The Supreme People's Procuratorate reported that from the start of the public interest litigation pilot in 2015 until November 2025, over 1.243 million public interest litigation cases have been filed nationwide, with approximately 1.119 million being administrative cases and nearly 124,000 being civil cases [1][1][1] Group 1: Case Statistics - In the first 11 months of 2025, over 129,000 public interest litigation cases were handled by procuratorial agencies, with administrative cases accounting for 91.7% of the total [1][1][1] - A total of 77,000 procuratorial suggestions were issued, achieving a response and rectification rate of 97.3% [1][1][1] - For cases where public interest protection responsibilities were not fulfilled after suggestions were issued, procuratorial agencies filed 6,595 lawsuits, with a success rate of 99.8% in court rulings [1][1][1] Group 2: Focus Areas and Future Plans - Over the past year, procuratorial agencies have urged administrative departments to actively fulfill their responsibilities in areas such as food and drug safety, women's rights, and the protection of cultural relics and wild birds [1][1][1] - Moving forward, procuratorial agencies plan to enhance the precision and standardization of their work by fully performing their duties, optimizing case handling structures, and adhering to their responsibilities [1][1][1]

食药安全往往涉及生产、流通、销售多个环节，容易出现监管盲区或推诿扯皮现象。检察公益诉讼如何 推动解决这一问题？在2月9日最高人民检察院召开的"深入推进'食药安全益路行'检察公益诉讼监督"新 闻发布会上，最高检公益诉讼检察厅副厅长邱景辉回答了记者提问。 "监管链条长、涉及部门多，'九龙治水'易导致监管盲区或推诿扯皮，这既是食药领域的典型特征，也 是治理的现实难点。"邱景辉表示，行政公益诉讼所具有的"督促"依法履职与"协同"多方共治的独特价 值，正好能成为打破部门壁垒、衔接监管断点的关键纽带，推动各个监管主体从"各自为战"转向"协同 共治"，真正织密食药安全的法治防护网。 谈及如何破除部门壁垒，强化"跨部门"协同履职，邱景辉介绍，针对监管实践中职责交叉、分工不明导 致的履职堵点，检察机关充分运用磋商、检察建议等手段，推动断裂的监管链条实现有效衔接。如广东 省云浮市检察院办理鸡蛋抗生素超标案时，一方面监督市场监管部门将漏检的磺胺类、四环素类等项目 纳入常规检测；另一方面推动农业农村部门加强养殖源头监管。通过检察监督的"穿针引线"，实现 了"产地准出"与"市场准入"的有效衔接。 食药产品往往跨区域流通，单靠一地的监管 ...

Core Viewpoint - The restoration of the Linfen Battle Command Post site has been successfully completed, transforming it into a vibrant historical landmark that preserves the memory of the 72-day urban battle and promotes the protection of revolutionary heritage [1][3]. Group 1: Restoration Process - The Linfen Battle Command Post site was found to be in a state of disrepair, with structural damages such as foundation sinking, wall cracking, and wood corrosion due to neglect and weathering [1][2]. - A special task force was established by the Yao District Procuratorate to investigate the site, leading to the initiation of an administrative public interest lawsuit on June 19 [2]. - The procuratorate issued recommendations for immediate repairs and the establishment of a long-term maintenance mechanism, which included securing over 670,000 yuan in special protection funds for the restoration [2]. Group 2: Functional Expansion - The restored site now features a mobile red cinema and a red expansion training base, serving as a public space for education and recreation, and has hosted numerous school visits for practical teaching [3]. Group 3: Long-term Protection Strategy - The Yao District Procuratorate emphasizes that the completion of the restoration is just the beginning of long-term protection efforts, with plans for regular inspections and a commitment of 3 million yuan for ongoing repairs and tourism development [5].

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate have jointly released a third batch of typical administrative public interest litigation cases, covering various fields such as agricultural land protection, agricultural product quality safety, prescription drug safety, public rental housing management, barrier-free environment construction, women's equal employment rights protection, and the protection of wartime cultural relics [1] - The selection of these typical cases is closely aligned with the principles of serving the overall situation and the people’s judiciary, focusing on agricultural judicial work, improving the standardization of agricultural practices, and better serving the modernization of agriculture and rural areas [1] - Some cases emphasize the protection and improvement of people's livelihoods by strengthening judicial protection in areas such as prescription drugs and agricultural products, thereby safeguarding the health and safety of the populace [1] Group 2 - The public interest often faces neglect due to the absence of direct stakeholders, leading to a "tragedy of the commons" scenario; the procuratorial authorities prioritize pre-litigation public interest protection but do not shy away from contradictions, opting to file lawsuits when necessary to address governance deadlocks [2] - In a specific case concerning the urgent situation of endangered cultural relics, the procuratorial authorities took decisive action by initiating administrative public interest litigation after the administrative agency failed to rectify issues following a procuratorial suggestion, thereby breaking the deadlock in cultural relic protection and facilitating substantial progress in the long-stalled restoration work [2]

Core Viewpoint - The release of the third batch of typical administrative public interest litigation cases by the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate aims to enhance the guidance and leading role of typical cases in promoting the rule of law and protecting public interests in various sectors [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Public Interest Litigation Cases - The seven typical cases cover multiple fields and reflect the importance of administrative public interest litigation in serving national interests and protecting the well-being of the people [1][2]. - The cases emphasize a problem-oriented approach, addressing issues where public interests are neglected due to the absence of direct stakeholders, thus highlighting the necessity of litigation to resolve governance deadlocks [1][2]. Group 2: Case Summaries - The case from Haikou City involves a company illegally occupying agricultural land and causing environmental damage, leading to a public interest lawsuit initiated by the local procuratorate after ineffective administrative responses [4][5][6]. - In Guizhou Province, a case was filed against the local agricultural bureau for failing to regulate pesticide use, which resulted in significant harm to local beekeepers and agricultural safety [10][11][12]. - A case in Chongqing highlighted the failure of the market supervision bureau to manage prescription drug sales, leading to public health risks due to improper sales practices by pharmacies [15][16][17]. - The case from Heilongjiang Province focused on the local housing authority's neglect in managing public rental housing, resulting in significant public asset losses and ineffective use of resources [20][21][22]. - In Henan Province, a case was initiated against the urban management bureau for failing to address safety hazards posed by improperly installed street fixtures, impacting the mobility of disabled individuals [25][26][27]. - The case in Anhui Province involved the local human resources bureau's inaction against gender discrimination in job postings, infringing on women's employment rights [30][31][32]. - A case in Shaanxi Province addressed the cultural heritage protection responsibilities of the local tourism bureau, which failed to act on the deteriorating condition of a significant historical site [35][36][37]. Group 3: Implications and Significance - The typical cases demonstrate the collaborative efforts of various departments under the unified leadership of the Party, showcasing a comprehensive public interest protection framework [2]. - The cases serve as a model for enhancing legal standards and promoting the stability and development of China's administrative public interest litigation system [2]. - The outcomes of these cases reinforce the importance of judicial oversight in ensuring that administrative bodies fulfill their legal responsibilities, thereby protecting public interests and promoting social governance [19][24][29].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing issues in the management of public rental housing in the Xing'an District of Hegang City, Heilongjiang Province, where the local housing authority has failed to fulfill its responsibilities, leading to significant problems such as long-term vacancy of units and mismanagement of tenant records [1][2][4] Group 1: Issues Identified - The Xing'an District Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau has been negligent in its duties, resulting in over 4,000 housing records being lost, contracts expiring, and information being inaccurate [1] - A total of 98 public rental units have been found to be vacant for an extended period, while 11 tenants do not meet the residency criteria, and 110 tenants have maliciously defaulted on rent for over six months [1][2] - The local prosecutor's office has identified ongoing issues with the management of public rental housing, including the loss of national and public interests due to the housing authority's inaction [1][2] Group 2: Actions Taken - The Xing'an District Prosecutor's Office initiated an investigation and issued recommendations for the housing authority to clarify issues, implement targeted strategies, and enhance regulatory oversight [2] - Following the prosecutor's recommendations, the housing authority reported that it had addressed some issues, including the eviction of 53 ineligible tenants, but subsequent investigations revealed that the authority had not fully complied with the recommendations [2][3] - The court ruled that the housing authority must continue to fulfill its responsibilities, leading to a special action for rent collection and tenant eviction, with a focus on improving management and coordination among relevant departments [3][4] Group 3: Systemic Improvements - The article notes that a digital archive system for public rental housing has been initiated, with an investment of over 100,000 yuan to develop a program that enhances information management and service processes [3] - The collaboration between the judiciary and the prosecutor's office aims to create a closed-loop system of supervision, judgment, and reform to effectively address the identified issues [4] - The public rental housing system is recognized as a crucial part of the social security framework in China, emphasizing the need for proper management to protect the interests of low-income populations [4]