2026年1月7日，山西省泽州县检察院干警在该县白水河河段查看河道整改情况。 响应：制发公益诉讼检察建议督促整改 2026年1月7日，北风刮得正紧，山西省泽州县白水河河道两侧的枯草被风吹得伏倒在地。"这回清理得 彻底，夏天河水肯定能痛快地流了。"附近村民对前来勘查的泽州县检察院公益诉讼检察官说道。 这里曾经是泽州县检察院办理督促保护白水河河道行洪安全公益诉讼案件的现场，彼时，河道内堆满了 开采的石料、砂石、油桶、建筑垃圾，既严重妨碍行洪安全，又破坏沿岸生态环境。如今，这些影响观 感、危害安全的堆积物已全部被清理清运，河床恢复了原本样貌。虽是寒冬，草木尚未返青，水流也较 平缓，但夏日汛期水流冲刷河床的痕迹依然清晰可见。 告急：3万余方弃渣成防洪隐患 位于晋豫交界处的白水河大箕镇两谷坨村段，是重要的国考水质监测断面。2023年夏，原监测站房被特 大洪水冲毁，项目主管单位随即启动重建工程。施工期间，为降低运输成本、加快进度，施工单位"就 地取材"，将河道内开采的石料、清理的砂石堆筑成临时施工便道。工程竣工后，这些渣土却未被及时 清运，日积月累形成长约60米、高约15米的巨型堆积体，犹如一道"土石坝"阻断河道自然流向 ...

食药安全往往涉及生产、流通、销售多个环节，容易出现监管盲区或推诿扯皮现象。检察公益诉讼如何 推动解决这一问题？在2月9日最高人民检察院召开的"深入推进'食药安全益路行'检察公益诉讼监督"新 闻发布会上，最高检公益诉讼检察厅副厅长邱景辉回答了记者提问。 "监管链条长、涉及部门多，'九龙治水'易导致监管盲区或推诿扯皮，这既是食药领域的典型特征，也 是治理的现实难点。"邱景辉表示，行政公益诉讼所具有的"督促"依法履职与"协同"多方共治的独特价 值，正好能成为打破部门壁垒、衔接监管断点的关键纽带，推动各个监管主体从"各自为战"转向"协同 共治"，真正织密食药安全的法治防护网。 谈及如何破除部门壁垒，强化"跨部门"协同履职，邱景辉介绍，针对监管实践中职责交叉、分工不明导 致的履职堵点，检察机关充分运用磋商、检察建议等手段，推动断裂的监管链条实现有效衔接。如广东 省云浮市检察院办理鸡蛋抗生素超标案时，一方面监督市场监管部门将漏检的磺胺类、四环素类等项目 纳入常规检测；另一方面推动农业农村部门加强养殖源头监管。通过检察监督的"穿针引线"，实现 了"产地准出"与"市场准入"的有效衔接。 食药产品往往跨区域流通，单靠一地的监管 ...

三、极速维权提质增效，全心守护消费安心 大研市场监管所锚定景区监管痛点与遗产保护核心需求，创新数字化监管路径提质增效。依托"丽江古 城区"APP平台，整合视频监控、智能预警、投诉溯源等技术，搭建"线上可视化监测+线下精准巡查"立 体监管体系，推动监管从"人海战术"向"智慧精准"高效转型。适配景区客流规律，推行"错时稽查+双随 机检查+重点监管"组合模式，旅游旺季日均部署6组巡查力量，全年开展专项巡查280余次，精准排查 经营乱象，既严守市场规范秩序，又守护古城遗产风貌，筑牢双重防护屏障。 二、协同共治闭环整治，全域净化市场生态 打破部门单一监管壁垒，构建"1+N"联合执法新格局，联动大研街道综合行政执法队、古城管理及景区 运营巡逻队，凝聚监管合力。聚焦餐饮、住宿、旅拍、酒吧、商品零售等核心业态，整合多领域检查事 项制定"一张清单"，推行"进一次门、查多项事"模式，全年开展联合执法1230次，检查经营主体15236 余户次，实现监管全覆盖、少干扰。针对价格欺诈、虚假宣传等游客高频投诉问题，常态化开展专项整 治，建立"排查-查处-整改-复盘"闭环流程，全年查办涉旅违法案件52件，罚没款22.9万余元，整改违规 问 ...

2025年7月9日，北京市通州区人民检察院检察官吕凡和助理王燕萍，在大运河畔就污水排放整改情况开 展"回头看"，以法治力量守护清水绿岸。受访者供图 在北京，一处历史建筑是否依法得到保护，一项公共设施是否消除安全隐患，背后不仅是行政管理问 题，也关乎法律监督的深度与效度。10年来，随着检察公益诉讼制度在首都落地生根，一种以法治方式 守护公共利益、推动社会治理的路径逐渐清晰。 2024年9月，北京市门头沟区人民检察院公益诉讼检察官刘帅与在校师生一同放生涉案救助的5只国家二 级保护野生动物红隼。受访者供图 2015年7月，全国人大常委会作出决定，授权在13个省（区、市）开展检察公益诉讼试点，北京是其中 唯一的直辖市。10年来，北京市检察机关共立案办理公益诉讼16286件、提出行政公益诉讼检察建议 4856件、提起公益诉讼205件，支持行政机关作为赔偿权利人开展生态环境损害赔偿工作400件。 2024年3月，北京市第十六届人大常委会第九次会议通过了《北京市人民代表大会常务委员会关于进一 步加强本市检察公益诉讼工作的决定》，把北京市检察机关从公益诉讼改革试点以来的工作实践和成功 经验上升至制度层面。在推进国家治理体系和 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Tianfu New Area Court is actively innovating in intellectual property protection, establishing a comprehensive judicial protection system to support the region's innovative development and address the challenges posed by emerging industries. Group 1: Source Prevention - The court emphasizes proactive governance in intellectual property protection, moving from reactive measures to preventive strategies, aiming to resolve potential disputes at an early stage [5] - A mechanism for risk dynamic warning has been established, particularly for emerging sectors like blockchain and artificial intelligence, providing clear guidance for industry innovation [5] - The court has implemented a "first case deliberation system" and a "package mediation" mechanism, significantly improving the efficiency of resolving batch disputes [6] Group 2: Professional Adjudication - The court has developed a dual-driven model of "talent + experts," forming multidisciplinary adjudication teams to tackle complex technical issues [7] - Digital tools, such as an intelligent document generation software, are being utilized to reduce the average trial time for intellectual property civil cases by 20 days by 2025 [7] - The court has published typical cases annually, with 35 cases covering key areas like artificial intelligence and cross-border e-commerce, providing clear legal boundaries for new industries [7] Group 3: Comprehensive Service - The court has established a "traveling court" model to provide legal services at major exhibitions, enhancing the legal environment for businesses [9] - Customized judicial solutions are offered to key enterprises in sectors like photovoltaic and integrated circuits, demonstrating a proactive approach to legal challenges [9] - The court engages in community outreach through various activities, fostering a culture of innovation protection and industry self-regulation [11] Group 4: Collaborative Governance - The court promotes a collaborative protection framework involving administrative, judicial, and social participation, enhancing the effectiveness of intellectual property protection [10] - Regular communication with local regulatory bodies has been established to unify enforcement standards and judicial criteria [10] - The court has extended its collaborative efforts to include cross-regional partnerships, enhancing the protection of creative industries [10]

（来源：新华日报） □ 本报记者 鹿琳 通讯员 江宣 许笛笛 1月20日下午，南京室外天寒地冻。走进建邺区江心洲街道洲岛家园社区党群服务中心，却是一片暖意 融融。三楼的少儿活动室里，孩子们专注地摆弄编程模块，指挥机器人完成指令；四楼舞蹈房中，老人 们手持彩扇，随着音乐节奏反复练习着新舞段。 作为江心洲街道首个安置房社区，洲岛家园的居民近八成为拆迁安置农民。如何针对安置房社区居民需 求特点，补齐公共服务短板、提升居民生活质量，一直是基层治理面临的现实挑战。 供给协同，创新"多元参与" 需求对焦，升级"服务枢纽" 临近春节，家住芳华苑的35岁宝妈曹丽格外忙碌。去年下半年，她在社区党群服务中心参加了保洁技能 培训并取得资质证书，从此利用闲暇时间，承接起社区及周边的保洁订单。眼下春节将至，保洁需求大 增，她的日程早已排得满满当当。 曹丽是土生土长的江心洲人，这里如今又名生态科技岛，是"新加坡—江苏合作理事会"框架下的旗舰项 目，也是南京迄今为止规模最大的整体对外合作项目。全岛开发之初，建邺区委、区政府作出全岛就地 拆迁安置、让原住民共享城市发展红利的决策部署，洲岛家园正是岛上首个拆迁安置小区。 "特殊的地理环境和发展 ...

□ 本报记者 朱文达 转自：中国质量报 以"有效监管"促"有力发展" 山东烟台深化"网络+监管"模式构建协同共治新格局 "我局充分运用技术手段，使监管视线'看得见、看得清、看得准'。"烟台市市场监管局相关负责人表 示，该局强化专业投入保障，每年专项列支财政预算72万元，用于购买第三方网络监测服务，实现了对 网络交易活动的常态化、全覆盖、高频次扫描；聚焦关键节点，在"3·15""6·18""双11"等重要消费时段 固定开展全年5次全领域集中监测，有效防范和化解系统性风险；满足个性需求，积极响应各业务条线 监测需求，开展直播营销等专项监测；畅通线索流转，建立高效的内部线索处理流程，由网络交易监管 条线统一监测、固证，并按职责推送至相关业务科室研判处置，形成了"监测—发现—流转—查处"的顺 畅闭环；坚持监管与服务并重，对情节轻微、负面影响较小的网络违法线索，采取警告、责令改正等措 施；对新打造的"校生活""金色云"等电商平台，委托第三方进行监测，对于发现的平台营业执照信息公 示不及时、对平台内经营者信息核验不严等问题，以督促整改和规范为主，营造了良好的网络发展环 境。 此外，烟台市市场监管局还通过机制创新，打破传统 ...

Core Insights - The Yangzhou maritime department reported that by 2025, the cumulative transshipment volume of wind power equipment in the Yangtze River Yangzhou section is expected to reach 4.353 million cubic meters, representing a year-on-year growth of over 86.82% [1] - The total export volume of wind power equipment is projected to be 4.0321 million cubic meters, with a year-on-year increase of 136%, ranking second nationwide, while the export volume of complete wind power units has maintained the first position in the country for two consecutive years [1] - Yangzhou maritime has implemented multiple measures to enhance safety and pollution management, aiming to establish a favorable transportation environment for wind power equipment [1] Group 1 - Yangzhou maritime department has strengthened service responsibilities to achieve new breakthroughs by conducting visits and research on wind power equipment production and transportation companies [2] - The department has arranged dedicated personnel to coordinate with terminals and agents, promoting a "multi-ship consultation" and "one ship, one plan" operational model [2] - Yangzhou port's 4th and 5th berths have been successfully coordinated to complete the first export task of wind power complete units in the Jiangdu port area [2] Group 2 - The Yangzhou maritime department has established a safety assurance system focusing on the "super long, super heavy, super wide" characteristics of wind power equipment transportation [2] - Utilizing "smart maritime" and big data platforms, real-time monitoring of vessel dynamics and weather conditions is conducted to ensure safety measures are implemented [2] - A joint mechanism has been established with other departments to monitor wind power transport vessels in complex waterways, ensuring comprehensive oversight [2] Group 3 - The department conducts 24-hour dynamic monitoring of vessels in port using CCTV and drones to ensure operational order [2] - Inspections are carried out based on vessel conditions, focusing on certificates, firefighting, and lifesaving elements, with all identified issues rectified before departure [2] - Yangzhou maritime aims to continue supporting local economic development and enhancing port infrastructure while providing quality services for the wind power industry [2]

Core Viewpoint - The introduction of the "Regulations on the Supervision and Management of Online Trading Platforms" is significant for regulating cutthroat competition, establishing a mutually beneficial governance mechanism for online trading platforms, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of all parties in the platform ecosystem, and promoting the healthy and sustainable development of the platform economy [1] Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The platform rules encompass service agreements and various transaction and governance rules established by online trading platform operators, possessing dual legal attributes [2] - The necessity for administrative supervision of platform rules is emphasized to ensure fairness and public interest, as existing laws do not sufficiently clarify certain issues [2] Group 2: Participation Rights - The regulations detail the procedural requirements for formulating and modifying platform rules, ensuring the participation and right to know for all parties, especially platform operators [3] - A seven-day public notice period is mandated before implementing general rules, and platforms must not coerce or induce operators or consumers to agree to new rules [3] Group 3: Execution and Appeal Mechanisms - New systems are established to safeguard the rights of platform operators and consumers to appeal and seek redress, addressing gaps in existing legal frameworks [4] - Platforms are required to inform operators and consumers of the facts and legal basis for any actions taken against them, ensuring timely and fair responses to appeals [4] Group 4: Focus on Operator Autonomy - The regulations address issues of excessive competition and the imposition of unreasonable conditions on operators, such as mandatory refund policies and unreasonable fees [5][6] - The regulations aim to prevent platforms from imposing unfair restrictions or additional unreasonable conditions on operators, thereby establishing a long-term mechanism to regulate cutthroat competition [6] Group 5: Collaborative Governance - The regulations encourage the establishment of a combined internal and external supervision mechanism for platform rules, promoting collaborative governance [7] - Platforms are urged to conduct self-assessments of compliance and seek external evaluations to enhance governance capabilities and optimize rules [7]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese authorities have reported significant progress in combating financial "black and gray industry" crimes, with over 1,500 cases investigated and more than 200 organized crime groups dismantled, involving nearly 30 billion yuan in illicit funds [1][3]. Group 1: Financial Crime Statistics - The scale of financial "black and gray industry" activities has surpassed 280 billion yuan in the first quarter of 2025, marking a 40% increase from 2023 [1]. - Complaints related to financial insurance have surged by 13.4% year-on-year in 2024, with over 700,000 complaints recorded on the Black Cat Complaint platform, highlighting the severity of the issue [2]. Group 2: Characteristics and Challenges - Financial "black and gray industry" activities are characterized by their systemic operation methods, including customer acquisition, evidence forgery, malicious complaints, and information manipulation [2]. - The use of advanced technologies such as AI for forgery and evasion poses ongoing challenges to existing defense systems, while the "data island" phenomenon complicates cross-institutional risk data sharing [2]. Group 3: Regulatory and Legal Framework - There is currently a lack of specific laws and regulations addressing typical gray industry behaviors like "agent rights protection" and "debt optimization," leading to ambiguities in legal definitions and enforcement pathways [2]. - The distinction between legitimate consumer rights protection and "agent rights protection" remains unclear, complicating industry identification and regulatory recognition [2]. Group 4: Industry Response and Collaboration - Financial technology companies are exploring intelligent prevention and collaborative governance mechanisms to combat the evolving landscape of financial "black and gray industry" activities [5][6]. - Companies like Qifu Technology and Haier Consumer Finance are leveraging big data and AI to develop intelligent fraud detection systems and have successfully assisted law enforcement in multiple cases [6][7]. Group 5: Collective Efforts and Achievements - The establishment of the "Anti-Financial Black Industry Alliance" has expanded to 167 member units, contributing to the resolution of 796 black and gray industry cases and preventing potential fraud involving over 19.1 billion yuan [8]. - Companies have reported significant increases in the identification of high-value "black and gray industry" leads, with some achieving a 234% rise in detection rates [8].