好久没看到大学教授们一本正经地上网辩论了。 如果你还没吃这口瓜，强烈建议跟进一下。 事情要从去年7月说起。那会儿，上海博物馆和埃及政府合作办了一场关于古埃及文明的特展。这是有史以来全球最大规模的古埃及文物出境展，规格非 常高，所以一上线就吸睛无数。 就是这场爆火的展览惹怒了一位叫黄河清的大学教授。长期研究西方艺术史的他，忽然做视频质问上博：敢保证这些展品真的就是千年前的文物吗？ 一 尤其是下图这双草鞋，看起来"一眼假"，根本不像有几千岁的样子。 说完自己的疑问，黄河清还建议上博好自为之，"别把上周的当成商周的"。否则哪天游客打12345投诉博物馆办假展，要求假一赔三退门票，可就惨喽。 其实，这不是黄河清第一次向古埃及文物开炮。 他历来的观点就是，整个古埃及文明是西方人伪造的，金字塔更是欧洲人在19世纪上半叶建成的。 然而，从来没有一个考古学者或者历史学家公开回应过他。 这种视而不见让他感到非常不满。 去年接受《南方周末》采访，黄河清就冲着记者狠狠吐槽此事，直言道：特别希望考古学家、世界史学者"不要做缩头乌龟，也不要搞鸵鸟政策"，勇敢地 站出来和自己辩论，把真相越辩越明。 同时，他还意味深长地告诉记者： "你一 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the concept of "Western pseudo-history" and aims to highlight the cognitive warfare tactics used against historical verification activities, suggesting that these attacks may originate from abroad [2][3] - It emphasizes that many proponents of "Western pseudo-history" lack the capability to engage in proper historical verification and may be easily manipulated by cognitive warfare tactics [3][4] - The article intends to provide a comprehensive methodology for effectively countering cognitive warfare related to "Western pseudo-history" [5][6] Group 2 - A broad methodology for dismantling cognitive warfare related to "Western pseudo-history" is proposed, emphasizing the need for a systematic approach to identify and counteract logical fallacies [6][8] - The article presents a case study involving the "Agamemnon's golden mask" to illustrate how cognitive warfare can create misleading conclusions based on flawed premises [10][11] - It highlights the importance of understanding the historical context and the evolution of human practices, such as beard trimming, to debunk erroneous claims made by proponents of "Western pseudo-history" [18][22] Group 3 - The article introduces the concept of "negative logic," which involves deducing premises from conclusions, as a tool for identifying cognitive traps in arguments [28][29] - It outlines the characteristics of negative logic, including its potential for innovative thinking and its application in cognitive warfare [31][32] - The methodology aims to empower individuals with scientific literacy to effectively counter cognitive warfare attacks [49][50] Group 4 - The article critiques the argument that "Homer's epics are false" by analyzing the cognitive foundations of such claims, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of memory capabilities in ancient cultures [52][53] - It discusses the significance of understanding the historical context of oral traditions and memory in ancient societies to refute claims against the authenticity of historical texts [54][55] - The article also addresses the cognitive warfare tactics that exploit misconceptions about the capabilities of ancient civilizations [56][57]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the phenomenon of "Western pseudohistory" and the belief that the "Yongle Encyclopedia" is a symbol of civilization superiority, reflecting a cultural defense mechanism in response to globalization and historical grievances [7][34][41]. Group 1: Historical Context - The "Yongle Encyclopedia," compiled during the Ming Dynasty, is presented as a monumental work that symbolizes ancient wisdom and knowledge [4][20]. - The belief that Western civilizations have fabricated their histories, particularly regarding ancient Greece, Egypt, and Rome, is central to the pseudohistory narrative [7][8]. Group 2: Cultural Phenomenon - The popularity of the "Yongle Encyclopedia" as a source of knowledge stems from a societal reverence for encyclopedias, particularly during periods of rapid social change and educational competition [21][22]. - The article highlights the historical context of encyclopedia consumption as a reflection of societal aspirations for knowledge and security during transformative periods [22][26]. Group 3: Psychological Drivers - The belief in the "Yongle Encyclopedia" as a source of all knowledge is linked to a collective desire for recognition and dignity in the face of cultural and historical challenges [34][35]. - The rise of pseudohistory narratives is seen as a coping mechanism for feelings of loss and insecurity in a rapidly changing world [34][37]. Group 4: Contemporary Relevance - The article notes a significant increase in videos promoting or refuting pseudohistory on platforms like Bilibili, indicating a growing interest in these narratives among younger audiences [37]. - The discussion emphasizes that engaging in pseudohistory may not effectively address the underlying issues of cultural identity and historical understanding [38][41].

公元1403年，白天。明成祖朱棣命人集古今群书，删其繁芜，成一巨典，名曰《永乐大典》。 三千儒臣硕学，昼夜抄录稗官野史、医学方术、农桑杂记、奇技淫巧等。五年后，修成二万二千多卷，装订一万一千多本，供朝廷内部存用。 修书的先贤肯定没成想，数百年后，这部古代文献索引集，在互联网时代成了《印第安纳·琼斯》电影里的约柜般的存在：既像是征服世界的钥匙，又像是 人类智慧的终极法器。好像得到了它的原本，文明就能开挂复兴。 这种效力，使得它成了支撑"西方伪史论"中最重要的房梁。 在中文互联网上冲浪，想必大家多少对西方伪史论有所耳闻。这种学说围绕一个中心两个基本点展开，中心就是古希腊、古埃及、古罗马的历史全系伪造。 只批判，不解释，黄金定律也白瞎。 批判西方伪造历史，进而宣称他们是落后文明，没法解释从文艺复兴到现代的西方文明创造的事实成就。 因此，为了增强可信度，他们又给这个概念加上了两个基本点：一个是中国乃万物起源，另一个是西方抄袭《永乐大典》。 2020年7月7日，两册《永乐大典》（湖字册卷2268-2269、丧字册卷7391-7392） 但很遗憾的是，被这群人广泛用来证明蒸汽机技术来源于中国的这张插画，并不是出自《永乐大 ...