编者荐语： （图片由 pimpampix/stock.adobe.com 提供） 以下文章来源于日经BP ，作者日经BP 日经BP . 日经BP成立于1969年4月, 隶属于日本经济新闻社集团。作为日本领先的B2B媒体公司，我们聚焦"经营 管理"、"专业技术"及"生活时尚"三大主要领域，满足客户多元化的需求。 直到不久前还价格高涨甚至令日本游客敬而远之的京都酒店，如今已降到了标准商务酒店 的水平。以日本首相高市早苗有关"台湾有事"的答辩为导火索，中国政府态度变得强硬，呼 吁民众暂缓赴日，导致酒店预订接连取消。原本高歌猛进的入境旅游突然踩下急刹车，到底 发生了什么？ 现在，京都市内的酒店发生了异常变化。曾经因外国游客激增、住宿设施供不应求而导致 房价高涨的"过度旅游"问题似乎成了过去式，酒店住宿价格大幅下滑。周末和节假日也是如 此。 只需在搜索栏中输入"京都 酒店"就能确认这一点…… 日经中文网"开设了"日经BP精选"栏目。日经BP是日本经济新闻社媒体集团的一员，成立于1969年。作 为日本领先的B2B媒体公司，聚焦经营管理、专业技术及生活时尚三大主要领域。敬请读者关注。 阅读更多内容请点击下方"阅读原文" （ ...

Core Viewpoint - To address the issue of overtourism, the city of Rome will implement a small entrance fee for close-up visits to the Trevi Fountain starting February 1, 2024, while still allowing free viewing from a distance [1][3]. Group 1: Ticketing Details - From February 1, 2024, visitors wishing to enter the core area of the Trevi Fountain will need to purchase a ticket costing €2 (approximately 16.5 RMB) [3]. - The ticketing will be available for purchase online or on-site, with access hours from 9 AM to 9 PM daily, except Mondays [3]. Group 2: Visitor Statistics - From January 1 to December 8 of this year, approximately 9 million visitors entered the restricted area of the fountain, averaging nearly 30,000 visitors per day, with peak seasons reaching up to 70,000 visitors daily [5]. Group 3: Revenue Generation - The city government anticipates that after operational costs, the ticket sales could generate around €6.5 million (approximately 53.6 million RMB) annually, which will be allocated for the protection of local cultural heritage [7]. Group 4: Historical Significance - The Trevi Fountain, built in the 18th century, is a renowned Baroque architectural landmark and a filming location for the classic movie "Roman Holiday" [9].

对于多数人来讲，"旅游美景"意味着一道视觉跟心灵的双重欢快盛宴，是摆脱平常生活牢笼的短暂逃 离。在这看似美妙的背后，实际上暗藏着消费主义精心编造的虚幻景象，以及我们对"逃离"自身过度的 依赖心理。 美景商品化的进程，不但暗暗改动了景观本来的本质内涵，而且在不知不觉里重塑了我们的体验方式， 它让我们于追求美景期间，不经意间忽视了那些着实关键的事物。 您不辞辛苦，翻山越岭，好不容易来到那个社交平台上极有标志性的"天空之镜"。可是，眼前呈现的景 象却使人非常失望，现场密密麻麻全是等待拍照的游客，脚下是一片夹杂着众多脚印的浅水滩。要拍出 像网络图片那样的效果，得寻找极为险峻的角度，还要借助强大的后期处理才行。 追根溯源这种幅度极为巨大的落差，在于美好的景致被强硬地从原本的生存环境之中剥离出来，仅仅被 简化成一个二维的、经过了极高程度筛选以及修饰的符号。你所消耗的并非是实实在在的风景，而是一 个预先被设定好的"打卡"情景，真实的、也许稍微有些杂乱的环境感受被彻底排除在外了。 过度旅游如何破坏美景本身 原本小众的古镇，随着一篇游记瞬间爆火，立即资本潮水般涌入，接着商铺雨后春笋般冒出，且逐步展 现出同质化姿态，物价飞速上涨 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Japanese government plans to increase visa application fees for foreign tourists starting from the fiscal year 2026, marking the first increase since records began in 1978 [1] Group 1 - The fee for a single-entry visa is currently 3,000 yen (approximately 139 RMB), while the fee for a multiple-entry visa is 6,000 yen (approximately 277 RMB) [1] - The increase will be based on the visa fee levels in European and American countries [1] - Part of the additional revenue generated from the fee increase will be used to address "over-tourism" issues [1]

Core Points - Machu Picchu, a UNESCO World Heritage site and one of the New Seven Wonders of the World, is at risk of losing its title due to issues of over-tourism and inadequate protection, as highlighted by the New7Wonders organization [1] - Local conflicts have arisen, with recent protests against transportation policies affecting access to the site, indicating social unrest in the region [1] - Despite concerns, visitor numbers to Machu Picchu are expected to exceed 1.5 million this year, returning to pre-pandemic levels seen in 2019 [1] - The Peruvian government disputes the claims made by the New7Wonders organization, asserting that conservation efforts are effective and recognized by UNESCO, and that Machu Picchu is not classified as a World Heritage site in danger [1] Summary by Category Tourism Impact - Machu Picchu is facing challenges from over-tourism, which threatens its status as a New Wonder [1] - Visitor numbers are projected to reach 1.5 million, matching the peak levels of 2019 [1] Social and Political Context - Protests by local residents against transportation policies have disrupted access to the site, reflecting ongoing social tensions [1] Government Response - The Peruvian government has issued a statement defending its conservation efforts and rejecting the New7Wonders organization's claims [1]

Core Points - A foreign couple was fined and expelled from Venice for swimming in the Grand Canal, highlighting the city's strict regulations against such behavior [1] - The local government has issued 1,136 expulsion orders for uncivil behavior this year, with approximately 10 related to swimming [1] - Venice is facing severe overtourism issues, prompting the government to implement measures like an entry fee for tourists to manage the situation [2] Summary by Category Regulatory Actions - The couple was fined €450 and ordered to leave Venice within 48 hours for swimming in the Grand Canal [1] - Local authorities have been proactive in addressing uncivil behavior, with a significant number of expulsion orders issued this year [1] Tourism Management - Venice is experiencing increasing challenges from overtourism, particularly during the summer peak season, leading to traffic congestion and environmental degradation [2] - The government has introduced measures such as a €10 entry fee for tourists to balance city preservation and tourism economic needs [2]

Core Points - A couple from the UK was fined and expelled from Venice for swimming in the Grand Canal, highlighting ongoing issues with tourist behavior in the city [1] - This incident marks the 1136th case of tourists being expelled for inappropriate behavior in Venice this year, with approximately 10 cases specifically related to swimming in the canals [1] - Local regulations prohibit swimming in the canals due to the high density of gondolas and poor water quality, which is not suitable for swimming [1] Tourism Management - Venice has been struggling with "overtourism," leading to increased scrutiny and enforcement of regulations against unruly tourist behavior [1] - The local authorities are considering implementing a more effective penalty system to deter potential violations by tourists [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights that Japan is implementing or planning to implement an "accommodation tax" in response to the surge in foreign tourists, which is putting pressure on local infrastructure [1][2][3] - Currently, 42 local governments in Japan have started or are planning to impose this accommodation tax, with over 90 local governments seriously considering it [2] - The tax rates are set at approximately 200 yen (about 10 RMB) per person per night for many areas, while some high-end accommodations may charge up to 1000 yen (about 49 RMB) or more per person per night [3] Group 2 - The increase in accommodation costs due to the new tax is leading some potential tourists, like a family from Guangzhou, to reconsider their travel plans to Japan in favor of domestic travel [3] - The Japanese government has already taken various measures to address issues related to overtourism, including considering the cancellation of tax-free shopping for foreign tourists and increasing departure taxes [3][16] - The rise in the yen's exchange rate has made purchasing luxury goods like LV less advantageous for tourists compared to previous years, with a 9% increase in the yen against the dollar since early 2025 [5][6] Group 3 - Japan's core Consumer Price Index (CPI) excluding fresh food rose by 3.1% year-on-year in July, marking an increase for eight consecutive months, with significant price hikes in food and accommodation [7] - Specific examples of price increases include a 30 yen rise in the price of a common rice product and a 400 yen increase for canned coffee, indicating a broader trend of rising living costs in Japan [8][9] - Despite the rising costs, the number of foreign tourists visiting Japan continues to grow, with 2024 projected to see 36.86 million visitors, a record high [11][13] Group 4 - The Japanese government is considering increasing the "International Tourist Tax" from 1000 yen (about 48.5 RMB) to between 3000 and 5000 yen (about 145.6 RMB to 242.7 RMB) per person [19] - A proposal suggests that increasing the departure tax could raise government revenue from 49 billion yen to approximately 250 billion yen (about 121.4 million RMB) [20] - While these measures aim to alleviate overtourism issues, there are concerns among local businesses that such policies could negatively impact Japan's tourism and retail sectors [20]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese local governments are increasingly considering or implementing accommodation taxes to manage the influx of foreign tourists and improve tourism infrastructure [1][2]. Group 1: Accommodation Tax Implementation - Over 90 local governments in Japan are seriously considering the introduction of accommodation taxes, with 42 already having implemented or planning to implement such taxes [1]. - A survey conducted by Kyodo News revealed that 92 municipalities are contemplating the addition of this tax, with 42 municipalities already in the process of implementation [1]. - The majority of municipalities that have set accommodation taxes have established a rate of around 200 yen (approximately 9.7 RMB) per person per night, while some high-end accommodations charge over 1000 yen (approximately 48.6 RMB) [1]. Group 2: Purpose and Use of Tax Revenue - The primary use of the revenue generated from accommodation taxes is for the construction of tourism infrastructure, followed by general tourism promotion, protection of historical and natural environments, and improvement of facilities for foreign tourists [1]. - Local governments are aiming to utilize the tax revenue to address issues related to overtourism, such as congestion, noise, and security concerns arising from the surge in visitors [1]. Group 3: Concerns and Challenges - Some municipalities have expressed concerns regarding the implementation of accommodation taxes, such as the need for clear communication on tax usage and the potential administrative burden on small accommodation providers [2]. - The introduction of accommodation taxes represents a significant shift in how local governments manage tourism financing, although not all are prepared to implement such taxes [2]. - There are worries that imposing accommodation taxes in less popular areas may drive tourists to other destinations, and without accompanying measures to attract visitors, the implementation may face difficulties [3].

Core Insights - The WTTC report indicates that limiting tourism in popular European cities could lead to a GDP loss of $245 billion and nearly 3 million job losses within three years [1][3] Group 1: Economic Impact - Major cities like Venice, Barcelona, and Paris are analyzed for the potential economic consequences of tourism restrictions, with Venice projected to suffer a direct GDP loss of $14.1 billion and an indirect loss of $18.4 billion [1] - France could face a loss of 284,000 jobs and $16.2 billion in tax revenue due to tourism limitations [1] Group 2: Over-Tourism Issues - Record tourist numbers have led to overcrowding, complaints from residents about noise and waste, and rising rents, particularly in cities like Barcelona, which hosted 26 million tourists last year [3] - Protests against over-tourism have erupted in Southern Europe, highlighting the growing discontent among local populations [3] Group 3: Management Strategies - The WTTC advocates for a balanced approach to managing over-tourism, suggesting the use of real-time data to monitor visitor flows and early detection of issues [4] - Encouraging tourists to explore less-visited areas and collaborating with surrounding towns for transportation routes are recommended strategies to alleviate pressure on major tourist destinations [4]