Core Viewpoint - The announcement from the Bolivarian Alliance condemns U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi's accusations against Venezuelan President Maduro, claiming they are an attack aimed at misguiding public opinion and diverting attention from U.S. systemic issues [1] Group 1 - The Bolivarian Alliance criticized Bondi's allegations linking Maduro to drug trafficking as a violation of international law [1] - The U.S. government has increased the reward for information leading to Maduro's capture from $25 million to $50 million [1] - Bondi labeled Maduro as "one of the world's largest drug lords" during her speech [1]

Group 1 - Slovenia has become the first EU member state to ban the import of all products from Israeli illegal settlements in occupied Palestinian territories, as announced by the government on August 6 [1] - The Slovenian Foreign Minister stated that this ban is a necessary response to violations of international law, sending a clear message that such actions should have consequences [1] - Slovenia is also exploring the feasibility of banning exports of Slovenian products to these regions [1] Group 2 - The Slovenian government highlighted the severe and deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip, deciding to provide nearly €880,000 worth of humanitarian aid, including food and blankets, to Palestinian civilians [2]

Group 1 - The Iranian Foreign Minister condemned the U.S. military attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, stating it is a violation of international law [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Omani government has expressed concerns that U.S. actions against Iran threaten to "escalate war" and violate international law [1] Group 1 - The Omani government is critical of U.S. military actions, suggesting they could lead to broader conflict in the region [1] - The statement emphasizes the potential for increased tensions and instability resulting from U.S. interventions [1] - The assertion of violations of international law highlights the legal implications of U.S. actions in the context of global governance [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian Foreign Ministry accuses the United States of betraying diplomacy and initiating a "dangerous war" against Iran following an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities [1] Group 1: U.S. Actions and Accusations - The Iranian Foreign Ministry states that the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities marks the beginning of a dangerous war against Iran [1] - The statement describes the U.S. actions as a violation of the United Nations Charter and international law, holding the U.S. government fully responsible for the consequences [1] Group 2: Iran's Response and Rights - Iran asserts its right to resist U.S. military aggression and to defend its national sovereignty and interests by any necessary means [1] - The Iranian Foreign Ministry calls for urgent action from the United Nations and its agencies, including the International Atomic Energy Agency, to address this blatant violation of law [1] Group 3: International Community's Role - The statement urges the international community not to forget the U.S. betrayal in the diplomatic process and calls for the United Nations Security Council to convene an emergency meeting to condemn the attack [1]