在金融投资的道路上，大家总是希望顺风顺水，但有时候现实却给我们带来沉重的打击。最近，北京朝 阳区双井富力广场的一家中国黄金概念店突然关门，许多投资者因此遭受重创，他们的辛苦积蓄瞬间化 为乌有。这不仅仅是一场普通的金融诈骗，更是一次关于投资陷阱的惨痛警示。 中国黄金曾经是备受信赖的国企品牌，口碑一直不错。可是，这次却成为了投资者的噩梦源头。店家以 托管业务为名，承诺可以帮助投资者赚取更高利润，实际上这却是一个精心策划的陷阱。他们在背后偷 偷摸索，暗中挪用消费者的财富，造成了严重的经济损失。 许多投资者受到了高利率的诱惑，把自己的黄金交给了这些商家托管，却没有意识到隐藏的巨大风险。 他们一心想着追求更多的利润，却忽略了对投资市场的理性分析，也没有提升自己对投资风险的警觉。 | 成色 | 6666 19 | | --- | --- | | | 1 250/2 50/50/100/20 | | 规格 | SALE AND SECRECT USD FOR COURS | | | 10001下(空10克): +30元/完 (C) (C) Carl Child Com (Reserver | | | 6155 第81基礎金 ...

据介绍，2023年3月以来，周某某等人成立多家"欣某系"关联公司，在不具备对接任何银行及不良资产 处置公司资质的情况下，以召开线下推介宣传会，线上推广引流等方式，宣称与多家资产管理公司机构 有合作，承诺可为信用卡、贷款逾期负债人解除全部债务，并成立"债审部"假冒客户接听催收电话进行 反催收。 值得一提的是，近年以为负债人解除债务为由实施经济诈骗的案例频现报端，不少诈骗团伙利用负债人 的焦虑情绪，扮成"救世主"，以"解债"之名收取"服务费""咨询费"，行诈骗之实。有承办检察官提醒， 警惕那些以"解债"为名，索要"服务费""手续费""刷流水费"等各类费用的个人或机构，任何声称能通 过"特殊渠道""内部操作"免除债务、消除不良征信记录、减免利息的，都是骗局，快速解债的"捷径"往 往是通往更大损失的陷阱。 南都讯 记者蒋小天 发自北京 12月25日，公安部举行新闻发布会，通报公安部和国家金融监管总局联合 部署开展金融领域"黑灰产"违法犯罪集群打击工作举措成效情况。 新闻发布会上公布十起典型案例，记者关注到，其中第九起案例为广东周某某等人涉嫌集资诈骗、非法 吸收公众存款一案。该案中，周某某等人以"4折解债"为幌子，承诺 ...

12月9日，香港金融管理局发文表示，近日接获多宗涉及伪冒金管局文件的查询。该文件声称一间保险 公司用户的账户因"涉嫌异常资金进入及违规股票操作"而被限制使用，并要求账户持有人在限期前转入 资金以恢复账户功能，否则账户将被永久冻结。上述文件并非由香港金管局发出。金管局绝不会就任何 个人财务事宜主动联络市民，亦不会要求市民作出任何形式的转账、缴款或账户验证操作，市民务必提 高警惕。金管局已就事件向香港警方报案。 责任编辑：曹睿潼 责任编辑：曹睿潼 12月9日，香港金融管理局发文表示，近日接获多宗涉及伪冒金管局文件的查询。该文件声称一间保险 公司用户的账户因"涉嫌异常资金进入及违规股票操作"而被限制使用，并要求账户持有人在限期前转入 资金以恢复账户功能，否则账户将被永久冻结。上述文件并非由香港金管局发出。金管局绝不会就任何 个人财务事宜主动联络市民，亦不会要求市民作出任何形式的转账、缴款或账户验证操作，市民务必提 高警惕。金管局已就事件向香港警方报案。 ...

案件的戏剧性在今年7月进一步升级：核心人物弗雷蒙德在一起被警方认定为自杀的车祸中突然身亡。由于法律限制，皮埃什无法向弗雷蒙德的家人 寻求任何赔偿。有消息人士透露，皮埃什现在生活境况窘迫，甚至出行只能乘坐廉价航空的经济舱。 巴黎检察官办公室确认，针对弗雷蒙德的刑事调查仍在进行，但截至目前，阿尔诺及LVMH尚未成为该刑事案的正式调查对象。 来源：国际财闻汇 据最新曝光的法律文件显示，一场涉及法国两大顶级奢侈品家族、标的额超过百亿欧元的民事诉讼在巴黎展开。82岁的爱马仕第五代继承人尼古拉· 皮埃什将LVMH集团及其董事长贝尔纳·阿尔诺告上法庭，指控对方以不当手段获取了其名下价值约140亿欧元的爱马仕股份。 英媒路透社首次将皮埃什与LVMH及阿尔诺的直接法律对抗公之于众。诉讼根源于一宗已持续数年的金融诈骗刑事调查。皮埃什指控其前好友兼长期 财务顾问埃里克·弗雷蒙德，通过"隐瞒与欺骗"，在其不知情的情况下，将其全部爱马仕股份——约600万股——逐步转让给了LVMH集团。皮埃什在 诉状中称，他对股份转移及资金去向均不知情。 然而，此案真相显得异常错综复杂。弗雷蒙德已故,他曾在早前的刑事案件调查中作出截然相反的陈述。他坚称 ...

一场围绕百亿美元爱马仕股份的跨国法律战，在2025年12月3日将奢侈品行业两大巨头推向风口浪尖。 82岁的爱马仕第五代继承人尼古拉·皮埃什（Nicolas Puech）正式向巴黎司法法院递交诉状，指控全球最 大奢侈品集团LVMH及其董事长贝尔纳·阿尔诺（Bernard Arnault）通过欺诈手段，非法获取其价值约 140亿欧元（约合162.6亿美元）的爱马仕股份。 这起案件不仅牵涉巨额财富转移，更因涉及两家百年奢侈品牌的恩怨史、核心人物离奇死亡，以及跨国 资本运作的灰色地带，成为全球财经与法律界关注的焦点。 当事人已离奇死亡 这起案件的戏剧性在于，关键人物弗雷蒙德已于2024年7月20日在瑞士阿尔卑斯山区自杀身亡。当日， 他刚接受法国司法部门为期三天的问询，被指控伪造文件、使用伪造文件及加重型滥用信任。瑞士警方 调查显示，弗雷蒙德骑自行车时故意撞向一列火车，现场无刹车痕迹，判定为自杀。 这一结局让案件陷入"罗生门"：弗雷蒙德生前坚称皮埃什知情，而皮埃什则指控对方"精心策划了一场 长达十年的骗局"。由于弗雷蒙德已无法出庭作证，皮埃什无法向其家人寻求赔偿，只能将矛头指向 LVMH集团及阿尔诺家族。 LV集团"恶 ...

Core Viewpoint - Nicolas Puech, the 82-year-old heir of Hermès, has filed a civil lawsuit against LVMH and its chairman Bernard Arnault, claiming that they unlawfully took over his Hermès shares valued at over $10 billion [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Puech alleges that he lost all his Hermès shares due to deceit by his financial advisor Eric Freymond, who allegedly transferred the shares to LVMH without his knowledge [1][2]. - The lawsuit was submitted to the French court in May, with the first hearing scheduled for November 20 [1]. - Puech seeks to recover the value of 6 million Hermès shares, estimated at approximately €14 billion (about $16.26 billion) based on current prices [1]. Group 2: Background of the Dispute - The financial dispute between Puech and Freymond is considered one of the most convoluted criminal cases in France, with allegations of fraud leading to the transfer of shares to LVMH [3]. - LVMH has been increasing its stake in Hermès from 2001 to 2013, ultimately holding over 23% of the company, which led to a prolonged legal battle between the two companies [3]. - Puech claims he was unaware of the transfer of his shares to LVMH and the whereabouts of the proceeds from the sale [3]. Group 3: Current Situation - Following Freymond's sudden death in a car accident, which was ruled a suicide, Puech faces challenges in seeking compensation as he cannot pursue claims against Freymond's family due to legal restrictions [3][4]. - Puech's current financial situation is reportedly dire, as he is now forced to travel in economy class [4]. - The French prosecutor's office is conducting a criminal investigation into Puech's case against Freymond, but LVMH and Arnault have not been formally investigated [4].

这里所提的刑事调查，是指2024年皮埃什起诉弗雷蒙德的金融案件，其指责后者违背信托和信任，将其 财产私自处置并转移。在过去的20多年里，弗雷蒙德一直负责管理皮埃什的房地产及其他资产。 扑朔迷离的真相 皮埃什与弗雷蒙德之间金融纠纷被视为法国的最曲折离奇的刑事案件之一。皮埃什指控称，弗雷蒙德通 过一系列诈骗手段从其手中榨取了600万股爱马仕股份，并通过空壳公司将其逐步转手给了LVMH。 12月3日，据最近爆光的一份民事诉讼文件显示，82岁的爱马仕第五代继承人尼古拉·皮埃什（Nicolas Puech）将法国奢侈品公司LVMH及其董事长贝尔纳·阿尔诺（Bernard Arnault）告上法庭，声称被告夺 走了Puech价值超百亿美元的爱马仕股份。 这是皮埃什首次对LVMH集团以及阿尔诺提起法律挑战，这也与皮埃什之前闹得沸沸扬扬的金融诈骗案 有关。据皮埃什之前声称，他在好友兼财务顾问埃里克·弗雷蒙德（Eric Freymond）隐瞒与欺骗之下， 损失了所有的爱马仕公司股份，而这些股份被悄悄转手给了LVMH集团。 根据尚未公开的诉讼文件摘录，巴黎司法法院5月曾估计，皮埃什曾经拥有的600万股爱马仕股份，按现 在的价格计 ...

Core Viewpoint - The emergence of AI-generated fake invoices poses a significant threat to financial trust, as these sophisticated tools make it easier for individuals to commit fraud [5][6]. Group 1 - Traditional methods of fraud involved basic tools like photocopiers and correction fluid, but advancements in technology have led to more sophisticated techniques [6]. - AI-generated fake invoices are now equipped with realistic trademarks, addresses, and details, even simulating wear and tear like creases and coffee stains [6]. - The potential for "deepfakes"—manipulated videos or audio that can make public figures appear to say things they never said—raises concerns about their use in political and financial fraud [6].

Core Points - Financial scams persist due to the allure of quick wealth, affecting individuals from various backgrounds, including the wealthy, ordinary citizens, and celebrities [1] - The book "Don't Be Fooled: A Brief History of Financial Scams" discusses real scam cases, the lessons learned, and what to avoid [1] Summary by Sections Case Study: Fred Hines - Fred Hines, a handyman, fell victim to a Nigerian inheritance scam, believing he would receive $64 million [2] - He mortgaged his property multiple times to raise funds for fees to access the supposed inheritance [2] - Hines received emails claiming to be from the FBI, further entrenching him in the scam despite obvious red flags [3] The "Airplane Game" Scam - The "Airplane Game" promised participants a return of $12,000 for an initial investment of $1,500, creating a pyramid scheme [4] - The game thrived for a while, with some participants earning significant sums, but ultimately collapsed due to its unsustainable model [4] - The FBI's crackdown on such schemes led to their rapid disintegration [4] Human Behavior and Financial Decisions - People often make irrational financial decisions, driven by emotions and the desire for quick solutions to their problems [5][6] - The book emphasizes learning from failures and scams rather than solely focusing on success stories, highlighting the importance of understanding human psychology in financial contexts [6][7] - Avoiding foolish decisions can be more beneficial than merely imitating successful strategies [7]

Core Insights - A recent criminal ruling from the Changchun Intermediate People's Court in Jilin Province has revealed details of a loan fraud case involving over 20 million yuan, characterized by a "rent cow - mortgage - re-rent cow" scheme [2][3] - The case highlights significant issues within financial institutions' risk control systems, including internal personnel allegedly accepting bribes to facilitate loan approvals [2][9] Summary by Sections Fraud Scheme Details - The perpetrator, Liu, designed a fraudulent scheme targeting agricultural loans by renting 297 cattle and using them as collateral to secure a 4 million yuan loan from a local bank, without proper verification of ownership [3][4] - Liu repeated this scheme, successfully obtaining additional loans of 500,000 yuan and 580,000 yuan from different banks, while misappropriating funds for personal debts and further fraudulent activities [4][5] Legal Proceedings and Sentencing - Liu was sentenced to 13 years in prison for loan fraud and aiding others in obtaining loans through false documentation, with significant financial penalties imposed [5][6] - Co-conspirators involved in the scheme received varying sentences, highlighting the collaborative nature of the fraud [5] Risk Control Failures - The case underscores critical vulnerabilities in the banks' risk management systems, including inadequate pre-loan investigations and a lack of monitoring for the use of loaned funds [7][8] - There is a noted absence of effective mechanisms for managing and verifying the ownership of biological assets used as collateral, which contributed to the fraud's success [9][10] Regulatory Implications - The incident raises concerns about the internal controls of financial institutions, particularly in light of increasing reliance on innovative financing methods such as live asset mortgages [9][10] - Regulatory bodies have emphasized the need for improved risk monitoring and management practices in agricultural finance to prevent similar frauds in the future [10]