Core Points - The article discusses the ongoing trade conflict between China and the United States, highlighting the shift from traditional retaliatory measures to a more complex struggle for global rule-making authority [3][7][24] - It emphasizes the impact of U.S. actions on global supply chains, particularly in the shipping and semiconductor industries, and how these actions disrupt the established norms of fair competition and contractual spirit [3][5][10] Shipping Industry - The U.S. has implemented a new port fee policy targeting Chinese vessels, charging $50 per net ton for Chinese ships and $18 for others, resulting in a potential fee of $500,000 for a 100,000-ton vessel [10][12] - This policy aims to increase operational costs for Chinese shipping companies, thereby reducing their competitiveness in the global market [10][12] - The U.S. strategy in the shipping sector is designed to indirectly affect China's foreign trade while maintaining its dominance in the global shipping market [12] Semiconductor Industry - The U.S. has introduced stringent semiconductor export bans, further isolating certain Chinese companies from the global supply chain and causing material shortages for downstream global enterprises [5][14] - The Netherlands has taken aggressive actions against a Chinese-controlled semiconductor company, citing concerns over its rising influence in the semiconductor sector, which reflects broader European anxieties about competition with China [14][24] - The U.S. and its allies are employing a combination of tactics to restrict China's access to critical semiconductor technologies, which could have long-term implications for global tech supply chains [14][22] China's Response Strategies - China is adopting a strategy of "asymmetric retaliation," focusing on areas where it holds competitive advantages rather than mirroring U.S. actions [16][20] - In the shipping sector, China has introduced a special port fee for foreign vessels with significant U.S. ownership, effectively targeting U.S. capital's influence in global shipping [16][18] - For the semiconductor industry, China is implementing stricter controls on rare earth supplies, leveraging its dominance in rare earth processing to influence global supply chains [20][22] Global Trade Dynamics - The ongoing trade conflict is expected to reshape global trade dynamics over the next 10 to 20 years, with a potential shift towards a multipolar trade environment [22][26] - The article suggests that countries prioritizing technological innovation and open cooperation will ultimately prevail in this evolving landscape [22][26] - China's commitment to fair cooperation is gaining recognition among developing nations, which may lead to increased collaboration and a shift away from U.S.-led hegemonic practices [24][26]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the perception of Trump's Middle East policy as aggressive and dismissive of international norms, with accusations of the U.S. acting as a bully and igniting conflict in the region [1][2][3][7] - Trump's support for Israel's actions in Gaza and his perceived disregard for Palestinian rights reflect a colonial mindset, as noted by various analysts [2][3] - The U.S. has lost credibility in the Middle East, as indicated by the comments from regional experts who believe that Trump's actions have exacerbated conflicts rather than resolved them [3][4] Group 2 - The Trump administration's approach towards Iran involves a combination of extreme pressure through sanctions and military threats, while simultaneously claiming to seek diplomatic solutions [4] - The U.S. military actions in Yemen have led to further humanitarian crises, raising concerns among Gulf states about the stability of the region [4] - Trump's demands for free passage of U.S. ships through the Suez Canal reflect a broader pattern of perceived economic and political extortion directed at sovereign nations [6][7]