Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article discusses the impact of AI on the Chinese college entrance examination (Gaokao), highlighting both its potential benefits and limitations in predicting exam questions and assisting students in their preparation [2][3][15] - AI prediction models analyze historical exam questions, trends, and educational policies to generate potential exam papers, but the effectiveness of these predictions is questioned due to the high level of confidentiality and scientific rigor in exam question design [3][4] - Despite the limitations of AI in accurately predicting specific exam questions, it plays a significant role in enhancing the overall preparation process for students, including time management and knowledge mastery [4][7] Group 2 - AI tools are being utilized to create personalized study plans, helping students allocate their study time effectively and manage their learning processes [4][7] - AI monitoring systems in exam settings improve fairness and efficiency by detecting potential cheating behaviors and ensuring a more objective grading process through automated scoring systems [7][8] - AI applications extend to assisting students and parents in filling out college applications by providing data-driven recommendations based on historical admission trends, thus reducing the information gap in the decision-making process [9][12] Group 3 - The emergence of AI in college application processes has made it easier for students to navigate their choices, but there are concerns about over-reliance on AI recommendations, which may overshadow personal preferences and aspirations [13][14] - The article emphasizes the importance of balancing AI's capabilities with individual values and desires, suggesting that while AI can provide valuable insights, it should not dictate life choices [14][15] - Ultimately, the integration of AI in the Gaokao process represents a technological advancement, but it also raises critical questions about the role of data and algorithms in shaping personal futures [15]

Group 1 - Douyin announced strict measures to combat the dissemination of false information during the college entrance examination period to protect the rights of students and parents [1][2] - The platform will focus on targeting behaviors such as providing cheating tools, score modification services, and other fraudulent activities that exploit the hopes of students and parents [1] - Douyin emphasized that certain actions related to cheating in national examinations are criminal offenses under the law, urging students and parents to be cautious and avoid falling victim to scams [1] Group 2 - Douyin will also combat false marketing practices that claim to use AI for predicting exam questions or providing high school admission counseling, which mislead students and parents [2] - Some accounts falsely present themselves as "college entrance examination volunteer planners" and charge high fees for dubious consultation services, despite the lack of official certification for such roles [2] - The Ministry of Education has previously warned that there are no official qualifications for "college entrance examination volunteer planners," and many of these individuals lack relevant experience [2] Group 3 - Douyin advised students and parents to carefully discern related content to avoid negatively impacting their exam preparation and college application processes [3] - The platform will also focus on combating the fabrication of false information related to the college entrance examination [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rise of "AI prediction" products marketed to students and parents during exam preparation, questioning their reliability and effectiveness in improving exam performance [1][6]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - Various businesses are promoting "AI prediction" and "AI score improvement" products, claiming accuracy rates exceeding 80% for exam predictions, with prices often around hundreds of yuan for study materials [1][2]. - The products are primarily targeted at anxious students and parents, with many customers purchasing these materials in hopes of better exam performance [1][2]. Group 2: Product Claims and Limitations - One seller claims their AI model predicts exam content with over 75 points coverage based on historical exam data, but the actual content is often broad and aligns with standard curriculum topics [2][3]. - Experts argue that AI-generated predictions fail to grasp the complexities of exam questions, which require higher-order thinking and contextual understanding that AI cannot replicate [3][4]. Group 3: Regulatory and Ethical Concerns - The marketing strategies employed by these businesses are criticized as misleading, with claims of high accuracy rates being deemed as false advertising under relevant laws [6][7]. - There are calls for regulatory bodies to address exaggerated claims and fraudulent practices in the "AI prediction" market, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in AI educational products [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rise of AI-assisted exam prediction materials being marketed to students preparing for the college entrance examination in China, highlighting the questionable reliability of these products and the associated risks in the market [1][2]. Group 1: AI Exam Prediction Products - Various tutoring institutions are selling "AI model prediction papers" for prices up to 398 yuan, with discounts available [1]. - A math teacher named Kang Wu claims to have an 80% accuracy rate in predicting exam questions using AI, specifically by feeding past exam questions into the AI model DeepSeek [1]. - The AI prediction process involves analyzing past exam questions to identify frequently tested topics and generating a new set of questions based on that analysis [1]. Group 2: Reliability and Marketing Concerns - The claimed "80% accuracy" is misleading, as the comparison reports used to validate this claim are overly simplistic, categorizing questions as "correct" based on broad topic similarities rather than specific content [2]. - Despite criticisms regarding the quality of AI-generated questions, these products remain popular on social media, indicating a high level of anxiety among parents and students [2]. - Experts suggest that AI exam prediction is primarily a marketing tactic, as the structure of the exams has remained consistent over the years, rather than being accurately predicted by AI [2]. Group 3: Regulatory and Ethical Considerations - Most AI products in China have restrictions on directly predicting exam questions due to legal and ethical concerns [3][4]. - The Chinese government has initiated measures to regulate the misuse of AI technologies, particularly in areas that could mislead or deceive users, such as AI predictions for exams [4].

Core Viewpoint - The rise of AI-assisted exam preparation materials, particularly "AI prediction papers," has become a new trend among students preparing for the national college entrance examination in China, despite concerns about their reliability and the potential for scams [1][5]. Group 1: AI Prediction Papers - Various tutoring institutions are selling "AI prediction papers" for prices up to 398 yuan, with discounts available [1]. - A math teacher named Kang Wu claims to have achieved an 80% accuracy rate in predicting exam questions using AI tools like DeepSeek, which analyzes past exam questions [1][3]. - The methodology involves feeding five years of past exam questions and two years of prestigious school test papers into the AI to identify frequently tested topics [3]. Group 2: Market Response and Concerns - Despite skepticism about the accuracy of AI predictions, these materials are gaining popularity on social media platforms, with some posts receiving thousands of likes [4]. - Experts have pointed out that the AI prediction papers are primarily a marketing strategy, as the exam format has remained consistent over the years, making it easier to predict certain types of questions [5]. - The transaction risks associated with these AI prediction papers are significant, as many sellers are small tutoring institutions or individual accounts that do not use formal e-commerce platforms, leading to potential scams [5]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - Most AI products in China have restrictions on predicting exam questions due to legal and regulatory concerns, emphasizing that high school exam content is confidential [6]. - The government has initiated measures to address the misuse of AI technologies, including the promotion of AI-related scams, which highlights the need for caution in this emerging market [6].