Natural Gas Swung From $7.72 to $3.62: These 2 ETFs Let You Trade the Chaos - 24/7 Wall St. S&P 5006,621.80 +0.18% Dow Jones46,585.80 +0.22% Nasdaq 10024,287.20 +0.21% Russell 20002,539.87 +0.10% FTSE 10010,088.40 +0.72% Nikkei 22553,955.50 +1.08% Investing Natural Gas Swung From $7.72 to $3.62: These 2 ETFs Let You Trade the Chaos By Austin SmithPublished Mar 25, 6:17AM EDT Quick Read United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) provides direct exposure to natural gas futures with $423M in assets and a 1.24% expen ...

The Invesco DB Oil Fund ETF (DBO) is an exchange-traded fund that aims to track the price performance of the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return, which makes this one of several exchange-traded funds on the market that uses futures as a way of providing investors with exposure to commodity markets. In this case, that commodity is West Texas Intermediate crude oil, which is the North American crude oil benchmark. This differentiates it from Brent crude oil, which is the global benchmark and is g ...

Losing StocksCenteneCNC• Vol: 8,949,599-$5.7313.22%$37.60Fair IsaacFICO• Vol: 191,264-$120.698.37%$1,320.51New Pluto GlobalPSKY• Vol: 11,777,622-$0.867.70%$10.33West Pharmaceutical ServicesWST• Vol: 680,188-$16.606.69%$231.47Axon EnterpriseAXON• Vol: 372,470-$28.305.06%$530.76 BNO Is Up 52% But the Hidden Costs Are Quietly Eating Your Returns - 24/7 Wall St.S&P 5006,830.60 +0.58%Dow Jones48,089.00 +0.81%Nasdaq 10025,127.60 +0.72%Russell 20002,577.00 +0.87%FTSE 10010,453.40 +1.13%Nikkei 22555,410.40 +1.59%St ...

Core Viewpoint - The ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF (UCO) is designed to deliver twice the daily return of WTI crude oil, which currently trades at $66.36, up from a December low of $55.44, indicating significant volatility and potential for both gains and losses [1] Group 1: ETF Performance and Market Dynamics - UCO has lost approximately 75% of its value over the past decade, highlighting the impact of volatility decay on long-term holders [1] - Retail traders have reported gains of +170% on UCO calls, driven by geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz [1] - The ETF resets its leverage daily, which can lead to value destruction in choppy markets, even if crude oil prices remain stable [1] Group 2: Influencing Factors - The primary drivers for UCO's performance over the next 12 months include OPEC+ production decisions and risks associated with the Strait of Hormuz [1] - The EIA Weekly Petroleum Status Report is a key data source for tracking supply and inventory shifts, influencing market sentiment and UCO's performance [1] - The futures curve's shape, whether in backwardation or contango, affects UCO's ability to achieve its 2x objective, with backwardation providing a positive roll yield [1]

Core Viewpoint - Natural gas prices are experiencing extreme volatility, with the United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) reflecting these movements, having fallen 90% from $30.72 to $3.13 per MMBtu in just five weeks [1] Group 1: Natural Gas Price Dynamics - Natural gas prices are influenced by a balance between supply and demand, which can change rapidly [1] - Demand factors include extreme cold weather that depletes storage and increased electricity demand from AI data centers [1] - On the supply side, storage levels relative to the five-year average are critical; a surplus can lead to downward price pressure [1] Group 2: Fund Performance and Mechanics - UNG has lost approximately 88% over the past decade due to contango roll costs and price cycles, as it holds near-month futures and rolls them forward [1] - The fund's performance is negatively impacted when the futures market is in contango, forcing it to sell low and buy high [1] - A shift to backwardation, where near-term contracts are more expensive than longer-dated ones, could benefit UNG's performance during supply shortages [1] Group 3: Future Outlook - Analysts suggest monitoring EIA storage reports for consistent deficits, which could indicate a bullish trend for natural gas prices and improve UNG's performance [1] - A normalized storage situation with a contango curve would likely continue to impose roll costs, limiting price recovery benefits [1]

Core Viewpoint - ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas ETF (BOIL) has experienced significant volatility, losing nearly 80% of its value over the past year and 99.97% over the past decade due to structural decay and contango effects in the natural gas market [1] Group 1: Performance and Volatility - BOIL fell 46% in a single month as natural gas prices collapsed by 90% from January peaks [1] - The fund's performance is heavily influenced by the supply-demand balance in the U.S. natural gas market, which is affected by weather conditions and increasing power demand from AI infrastructure [1] - Traders are attracted to BOIL for its volatility, viewing it as a short-term instrument rather than a long-term investment [1] Group 2: Market Dynamics - Natural gas prices spiked to $30.72 per MMBtu on January 23, 2026, before collapsing to approximately $3.13 by late February, demonstrating extreme price swings [1] - Cold weather increases heating demand, leading to price spikes, while the growth of data centers adds a structural floor to natural gas consumption [1] - Monitoring the EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report is crucial for understanding potential supply deficits that could lead to price spikes [1] Group 3: Risks and Structural Issues - The primary risk for long-term holders of BOIL is not volatility but the structural decay due to daily leverage resets and contango, which erodes returns even when prices are stable [1] - BOIL has lost 99.97% of its value over the past decade, highlighting the impact of contango on leveraged ETFs [1] - Future performance will depend on storage data leading into winter 2026, with contango continuing to erode value during calm periods [1]

Core Viewpoint - ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas ETF (BOIL) provides 2x daily exposure to natural gas price movements, but has experienced significant declines, making it a potential short-term speculation opportunity following recent geopolitical events [2][7]. Macro Factors - The primary macroeconomic driver for BOIL is the balance of natural gas supply and demand, which influences Henry Hub spot prices. A notable spike occurred in January 2026, where prices surged to $30.72/MMBtu before collapsing to $3.13/MMBtu within a month due to extreme winter demand and supply constraints [3]. - Weekly storage levels are crucial to monitor, as reported by the EIA. A storage deficit compared to the five-year average typically leads to higher prices, while a surplus exerts downward pressure. Current February 2026 prices are below the February 2025 range of $3.22-$7.15, indicating a comfortable supply situation, though this could change with increased LNG export capacity [4]. Micro Factors - BOIL faces a significant structural risk due to its daily reset of the 2x leverage target, leading to value erosion in sideways or volatile markets. This phenomenon, known as beta slippage, has resulted in a 99.9% loss of value over the past decade, despite natural gas prices remaining above zero [5]. - The natural gas futures curve should be monitored, particularly the contango situation, where near-month contracts are cheaper than future months. This condition adds additional losses each time the fund rolls over expiring contracts, compounding the negative effects beyond spot price movements [6].

As the market re-opens post escalation, the shape of the curve depends on how participants interpret the shock. If traders believe the disruption will be short-lived or largely symbolic, the front may spike while the back end remains anchored by long term supply expectations. Eventually, the front will soften and come back. That produces a sharp kink in the curve. If, on the other hand, the conflict threatens prolonged production losses or structural export constraints, deferred contracts can also move high ...

Core Insights - Bitcoin's recent rally of approximately 10% over two days has sparked discussions regarding the influence of Wall Street market makers, particularly in relation to a lawsuit involving Jane Street [1] - The focus on Jane Street may oversimplify the complex market mechanics that govern spot Bitcoin ETFs [2] Group 1: Market Mechanics - Bitcoin ETFs are designed to track the asset's spot price, but the creation and redemption process allows institutional middlemen to fulfill demand without directly trading Bitcoin on public exchanges [2] - Authorized participants, the large trading firms responsible for creating and redeeming ETF shares, operate under regulatory exemptions that enable them to meet ETF demand without necessitating immediate spot Bitcoin purchases [3] Group 2: Impact of ETF Structure - The regulatory exemptions for authorized participants can create a "grey window" where ETF share creation and spot market transactions are not closely linked, leading to a disconnect between ETF inflows and immediate buying pressure in the spot Bitcoin market [4] - The structure of Bitcoin ETFs may incentivize trading in derivatives over spot markets, as Bitcoin futures often trade at a premium to spot prices, allowing authorized participants to hedge exposure using futures [5] - Adjustments in futures positions, whether due to macroeconomic changes or narrowing spreads, can lead to amplified price swings, resulting in sudden pullbacks that may confuse retail investors [6]

Once again, the energy markets are in a high-stakes standoff, which means traders have to decide whether to stand down or get involved. For the second time in the past 12 months, geopolitical friction involving Iran is creating a "fear premium" in crude oil (QAK26) prices. For investors, this volatility presents a tactical opportunity, but the choice of vehicle used can lead to vastly different outcomes. The traditional choices line up this way: Do you own the physical commodity or the companies that extr ...