Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Senate has passed a resolution to terminate President Trump's comprehensive tariff policy, reflecting growing bipartisan concerns over the economic impact of these tariffs [3][4][6]. Group 1: Legislative Actions - The Senate voted 51-47 to approve the resolution, which aims to end the national emergency declared by the President to implement global tariffs [3][4]. - This resolution follows two earlier votes aimed at canceling tariffs on Canada and Brazil, indicating a trend of legislative pushback against Trump's tariff policies [6][7]. - The House of Representatives is expected to struggle to pass the resolution, as the Republican leadership has set special rules to block such votes [6][7]. Group 2: Economic Implications - Senator Tim Kaine criticized the chaotic nature of Trump's tariff strategy, suggesting it leads to confusion and economic disruption [6]. - Concerns have been raised about the impact of tariffs on U.S. businesses, particularly in agriculture and manufacturing sectors, highlighting a divide within the Republican Party regarding support for Trump's policies [7][9]. - A legal challenge is underway, with several companies and states arguing that the tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) are illegal and impose significant financial burdens on American businesses [9][10]. Group 3: Legal Context - The IEEPA allows the President to impose economic controls during a national emergency, but its application in this context is being contested in court [9][10]. - The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments regarding the legality of these tariffs, with businesses claiming that the President has overstepped his authority [9][10]. - The legal challenges emphasize that tariff decisions should fall under congressional authority rather than unilateral presidential action [10].

8月29号这天，美国联邦巡回上诉法院给了特朗普的"对等关税"一记结结实实的重拳——直接判定他靠着《国际紧急经济权力法》（IEEPA）加征的大部分 全球关税，纯属越权，根本不合法！不过也没赶尽杀绝，留了个缓冲期，等到10月14号，让最高法院来最终定调。 巧了不是，几乎同一时间，加州联邦法官也撂了句硬话：特朗普把国民警卫队和海军陆战队调去洛杉矶"帮忙执法"，这事同样没道理，不合法！法院的木槌 刚落下，全国的抗议声浪立马就起来了——劳工们、教育界的老师、服务业的工作人员，还有工地上的工人，举着标语就往街上冲，那阵仗可不小。 不过这次裁决也没把路堵死，留了个缓冲期，让现有政策先撑到10月中旬，给上诉留了点时间。但白宫和司法部硬气得很，一口咬定总统这么做合法，全是 为了国家安全和经济安全，半点不让步。 舆论场上倒没一边倒地骂，有分析师直接泼冷水：就算最高法院最后站在下级法院这边，关税也未必会黄，大不了换个"法律口袋"接着用——比如拿国家安 全当由头搞232调查，或者走《1974年贸易法》第122条里的国际收支紧急措施，条条大路通罗马嘛！ 232这张牌最近几年打得可熟了，钢铁、铝还有相关的衍生品，税率一路涨到50%，征税 ...