Quantitative Models and Construction Methods - **Model Name**: CSI 300 Equal Weight Index **Model Construction Idea**: The index uses the same sample as the CSI 300 Index but applies equal-weighted methodology to achieve more balanced industry and stock exposure[22][24][29] **Model Construction Process**: 1. **Sample Selection**: The index shares the same sample as the CSI 300 Index, which includes 300 large-cap, liquid stocks from the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets[24]. 2. **Weighting Methodology**: Unlike the CSI 300 Index, which uses adjusted market capitalization weighting, the CSI 300 Equal Weight Index assigns equal weights to all constituent stocks[24]. 3. **Periodic Adjustments**: The index undergoes semi-annual reviews in June and December to adjust its sample and weights[24]. **Evaluation**: The equal-weight methodology reduces concentration risk and provides more diversified exposure across industries and stocks[29][31]. - **Model Name**: Quantitative Trading Optimization Model for CSI 300 Equal Weight LOF **Model Construction Idea**: The model aims to minimize tracking error and transaction costs for the CSI 300 Equal Weight LOF fund through quantitative optimization[50]. **Model Construction Process**: 1. **Replication Strategy**: The fund employs a full replication strategy to closely track the CSI 300 Equal Weight Index[50]. 2. **Optimization**: During index adjustments or fund inflows/outflows, the model optimizes trading decisions based on market liquidity to reduce transaction costs and tracking error[50]. **Evaluation**: The model effectively controls tracking error and enhances fund performance relative to the benchmark[50][51]. Model Backtesting Results - **CSI 300 Equal Weight Index**: - Annualized Return: 7.83%[39][40] - Annualized Sharpe Ratio: 0.42[40] - Annualized Volatility: 26.43%[40] - Maximum Drawdown: 71.81%[40] - **CSI 300 Equal Weight LOF**: - Tracking Error (2016-2026): 1.10% annualized[50] - Tracking Error (2026 onwards): 0.43% annualized[51] - Daily Tracking Deviation: Controlled within 0.13%[50] - Annualized Excess Return: 2.52% relative to the benchmark[50] Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods - **Factor Name**: Scale Factor **Factor Construction Idea**: Measures the relative performance of small-cap stocks versus large-cap stocks[43]. **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Monthly excess returns of the CSI 300 Equal Weight Index relative to the CSI 300 Index are calculated[43]. 2. Correlation analysis is performed between these excess returns and the monthly returns of the Barra scale factor[43]. **Evaluation**: The CSI 300 Equal Weight Index tends to outperform in market environments favoring small-cap stocks[43]. - **Factor Name**: Profitability Factor **Factor Construction Idea**: Examines the relationship between profitability trends and index performance[43]. **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Monthly excess returns of the CSI 300 Equal Weight Index relative to the CSI 300 Index are calculated[43]. 2. Correlation analysis is performed between these excess returns and the monthly returns of the Barra profitability factor[43]. **Evaluation**: The CSI 300 Equal Weight Index tends to underperform in market environments where profitability is a dominant factor[43]. Factor Backtesting Results - **Scale Factor**: Monthly excess returns of the CSI 300 Equal Weight Index show a negative correlation with the Barra scale factor, indicating better performance in small-cap-dominated markets[43]. - **Profitability Factor**: Monthly excess returns of the CSI 300 Equal Weight Index show a negative correlation with the Barra profitability factor, indicating weaker performance in profitability-driven markets[43].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - There is no information about the industry investment rating in the provided report. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Since March, geopolitical conflicts have escalated, leading to a significant decline in the stock market. The weakening of equity assets has caused an obvious drawdown in "fixed - income +" products and increased redemption pressure [1][10]. - In the second half of 2025, institutions significantly increased their allocation to equity assets. The current increased redemption pressure of "fixed - income +" may lead to a negative feedback loop of institutional selling and accelerated asset decline [3][20]. - Through scenario testing, if there is no significant double - kill of stocks and bonds, the risk of a large - scale net value drawdown of wealth management products is limited, but there may be some active redemption pressure. First - tier and second - tier bond funds with more equity assets may face greater redemption pressure in the negative feedback, but the pressure is still controllable [4][5]. - If the redemption pressure of "fixed - income +" continues, it may lead to a reduction in equity asset allocation, a widening of the spread of Tier 2 capital bonds, and a narrowing of the term spread [6][49]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 March Onwards: Increased Redemption Pressure on "Fixed - Income +" - Since March, due to geopolitical conflicts, the global liquidity expectation has shifted, and the equity and convertible bond markets have significantly adjusted, causing the cumulative gains and losses of most broad - based indices to turn negative. The weakening of equity assets has led to an obvious drawdown in "fixed - income +" products and increased redemption pressure [1][10]. - From the beginning of the year to March 27, the cumulative yields of the short - term pure bond, medium - and long - term pure bond, first - tier bond fund, and second - tier bond fund indices were 0.45%, 0.64%, 0.65%, and 0.27% respectively. The proportions of short - term pure bond and medium - and long - term pure bond funds with negative cumulative returns since the beginning of the year were 3% and 7% respectively, while those of first - tier and second - tier bond funds were 10% and 27% respectively [1][12]. - Since the beginning of the year, medium - and short - term bonds have performed well. Most wealth management products have achieved positive returns, and the net - breaking rate is relatively low. As of March 27, 3.8% of wealth management products had negative cumulative yields, and the net - breaking rate of existing wealth management products was 1.1% [2][16]. 3.2 Background of "Fixed - Income +" Redemption: Institutional Increase in Equity Asset Allocation - In the second half of 2025, institutions significantly increased their allocation to equity assets, which may lead to a negative feedback loop of institutional selling and accelerated asset decline. - Wealth management may have increased its allocation to equity assets through public funds. Although the proportion of equity assets in wealth management assets decreased from 2.4% in the middle of 2025 to 1.9% at the end of the year, the proportion of public funds in wealth management assets increased from 4.2% to 5.1% [20]. - The proportion of pension's equity assets increased from 6.4% to 9.6%. In the second half of 2025, the net value of pension's equity assets increased by 773.5 billion yuan, while the net value of fixed - income assets decreased by 100.49 billion yuan [22]. - The proportion of insurance's stock investment increased from 8.5% to 9.7%. In the third and fourth quarters of 2025, the net asset scale of insurance's stocks increased by 552.5 billion yuan and 113.5 billion yuan respectively [26]. - In the second half of 2025, the scale of second - tier bond funds increased significantly, and the proportion of equity allocation increased from 11.64% to 13.93%. In total, institutions such as wealth management, insurance, pension, and second - tier bond funds increased their allocation to stocks by more than 700 billion yuan in the second half of 2025 [28][36]. 3.3 "Fixed - Income +" Net Value Drawdown Pressure Calculation 3.3.1 Redemption Pressure on Wealth Management Products - By assuming that non - cash - management fixed - income wealth management products have a bond - to - stock ratio of 92.5:7.5, and considering the bond's annualized coupon rate of 1.7% and a duration of 1.34 years, different market scenarios are simulated. - If bonds do not decline, wealth management products can basically maintain positive returns. Even if the stock market falls by 15%, the coupon income can generally offset the losses from the stock decline. In the case of a double - kill of stocks and bonds, wealth management products may experience a large - scale and significant drawdown. - Currently, the risk of large - scale passive redemption of wealth management products is relatively limited, but there is some active redemption pressure [4][40]. 3.3.2 Redemption Pressure on Funds - First - tier and second - tier bond funds with more equity assets may face greater redemption pressure in the negative feedback, but the pressure is still controllable. - In the most extreme scenario (the stock index falls by 20% and interest rates rise by 40bps), the proportion of second - tier bond funds with a drawdown of more than 5% is 32%, with a scale of about 2.4 trillion yuan, and the proportion of those with a drawdown of more than 3% will exceed 70%, reaching 3.6 trillion yuan. Even if bond interest rates remain unchanged, if the stock market retraces by 10%, 11.9% and 4.3% of second - tier bond funds will have drawdowns of more than 3% and 5% respectively, with scales of 726.3 billion and 158.4 billion yuan [5][44]. 3.4 Risks of "Fixed - Income +" Redemption - If the redemption of "fixed - income +" continues, it may lead to a reduction in equity asset allocation, a widening of the spread of Tier 2 capital bonds, and a narrowing of the term spread. The redemption of "fixed - income +" will directly lead to the selling of equity assets, which is a further negative for the stock market. Due to the strong liquidity of Tier 2 capital bonds, they are likely to be sold off in the market adjustment, leading to a widening of the spread. In addition, during periods of high redemption pressure, public funds may sell short - term and highly liquid bonds first, causing short - term interest rates to rise and the term spread to narrow [6][49].

Investment Rating - The report suggests a cautious investment approach, focusing on defensive factors and identifying opportunities in performance increment information [1][12]. Core Insights - The current market sentiment is dominated by caution, with defensive factors showing overall superiority, although there has been a marginal decline in the short term [1][12]. - Geopolitical conflicts remain a core concern, with potential risks evolving, impacting market dynamics significantly [20][21]. - The upcoming peak period for annual report disclosures is expected to shift market focus from macro narratives to micro fundamentals, making performance expectations a critical variable [22][25]. Summary by Sections Market Sentiment and Performance - Cautious sentiment prevails in March, with defensive factors like valuation, volatility, and turnover rates performing well, while market turnover has decreased to below 2 trillion [12][16]. - Structural changes are emerging, with defensive factors showing marginal declines while growth styles are attempting a rebound in large and mid-cap stocks [16][19]. Geopolitical Risks - Ongoing geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East, are influencing global risk appetite, with significant implications for energy prices and supply chains [20][21]. - Two potential scenarios are outlined: continued conflict leading to sustained high oil prices and supply chain disruptions, or a de-escalation that could enhance market performance through improved earnings expectations [21]. Earnings Reports and Market Dynamics - The first peak of annual report disclosures is approaching, with performance expectations likely to become a key market driver [22][25]. - The report emphasizes the importance of identifying stocks with significant performance discrepancies relative to market expectations, particularly in undervalued segments [25]. Factor Performance Tracking - The report tracks the effectiveness of various factors such as valuation, growth, and profitability across different stock pools, highlighting their performance metrics [26][27][28][29].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the rapid growth and standardization of the domestic ETF market, with Bosera Fund's extensive ETF product lineup aiming to enhance the quality and health of the market as it surpasses 6 trillion yuan in size by 2026 [1][2]. Group 1: Bosera ETF Comprehensive Layout - Since launching its first ETF product in 2009, Bosera Fund has developed a comprehensive ETF product system covering various categories including broad-based, thematic, cross-border, bond, commodity, and Smart Beta ETFs, catering to diverse investment goals and risk preferences [2][8]. - In the technology innovation sector, Bosera Fund has aligned its offerings with national strategies, creating a product line that includes six specialized ETFs focused on areas such as artificial intelligence, chips, and new materials, providing investors with diverse tools for tech investments [2][3]. Group 2: Bond ETF System - Bosera Fund has established a complete bond ETF system, referred to as the "Five-Star Toolbox," which includes various bond types such as convertible bonds, 30-year government bonds, and credit bonds, offering investors a range of tools for capturing structural opportunities in the bond market [3][4]. Group 3: Broad-based and Thematic ETFs - The company offers 11 broad-based products that cover different market capitalizations and focuses on thematic ETFs aligned with national strategies like digital economy and green low-carbon initiatives, providing investors with diverse index investment tools [4][5]. Group 4: Smart Beta Strategy Innovation - Bosera Fund has developed Smart Beta strategy products that go beyond traditional index replication, incorporating mechanisms like market cap deviation and dynamic rebalancing to meet diverse investor strategy needs [6][9]. Group 5: Commodity and Cross-border ETFs - In addition to traditional assets, Bosera Fund has introduced products like the "Gold ETF" to combat inflation, enhancing its comprehensive product matrix for investors [7]. - The company is expanding its cross-border investment channels, offering products that include key indices from Hong Kong and the U.S., allowing domestic investors to diversify their market exposure [7][10]. Group 6: Research and Development Foundation - With nearly three decades of experience, Bosera Fund has built a strong foundation in index investment, managing over 1.6746 trillion yuan in assets as of December 31, 2025, and focusing on long-term value investment [8][9]. - The company has established a specialized quantitative investment team, gaining substantial experience in index compilation and liquidity management, which enhances the adaptability and competitiveness of its products [9].

Report Investment Rating - The operation rating of CITIC Five-Style - Stable is ★☆☆ [4] Core Viewpoints - In the week ending March 27, 2026, the weekly returns of Tonglian All A (Shanghai, Shenzhen, Beijing), ChinaBond Composite Bond, and Nanhua Commodity Index were -0.76%, 0.06%, and -0.25% respectively. The convertible bond strategy in the public fund market performed well with a weekly return rate of 0.60%, while the equity long strategy index continued to decline, and most neutral strategy products rose. The pure - bond strategy index closed up, and the medium - to - long - term return was stronger than that of short - term pure bonds. Among commodities, the energy and chemical ETF rose 3.35%, the precious metal ETF net value continued to decline, and the non - ferrous metal ETF's return rebounded slightly [3] - Among the CITIC Five - Style indices, the stable and cyclical styles closed up, while the other styles closed down. The style rotation chart shows that the relative strength of the cyclical style has increased significantly recently, and the relative strength momentum of the consumption style has declined marginally. In the public fund pool, the growth and financial style fund indices outperformed the benchmark, with weekly excess return rates of 0.89% and 0.64% respectively. The market's bias towards the growth and financial styles has increased. This week, the market congestion index rebounded, and the current financial style congestion is in the medium - to - high percentile range of the past year [3] - Among the Barra factors, the short - term momentum factor performed strongly in the past week, the return of the profitability factor adjusted, the winning rate of the liquidity factor continued to decline, and the valuation and scale factors rebounded marginally. This week, the cross - section rotation speed of factors increased month - on - month and is currently in the medium percentile range of the past year [3] - According to the latest scoring results of the style timing model, the financial style rebounded marginally this week, and the current signal continues to be the stable style. The return rate of the style timing strategy last week was 0.56%, and the excess return rate compared with the benchmark balanced allocation was 1.13% [3] Summary by Directory Fund Market Review - **Market Index Returns**: The weekly returns of Tonglian All A (Shanghai, Shenzhen, Beijing), ChinaBond Composite Bond, and Nanhua Commodity Index were -0.76%, 0.06%, and -0.25% respectively [3] - **Public Fund Strategy Performance**: The convertible bond strategy had a weekly return of 0.60%. The equity long strategy index continued to decline, most neutral strategy products rose. The pure - bond strategy index closed up, with medium - to - long - term returns stronger than short - term pure bonds. The energy and chemical ETF rose 3.35%, the precious metal ETF net value continued to decline, and the non - ferrous metal ETF's return rebounded slightly [3] CITIC Five - Style Analysis - **Style Index Performance**: The stable and cyclical styles closed up, while the other styles closed down. The relative strength of the cyclical style increased significantly, and the relative strength momentum of the consumption style declined marginally [3] - **Fund Pool Performance**: The growth and financial style fund indices outperformed the benchmark, with weekly excess return rates of 0.89% and 0.64% respectively. The market's preference for growth and financial styles increased [3] - **Style Congestion**: The market congestion index rebounded, and the current financial style congestion is in the medium - to - high percentile range of the past year [3] Barra Factor Analysis - **Factor Performance**: The short - term momentum factor performed strongly, the return of the profitability factor adjusted, the winning rate of the liquidity factor continued to decline, and the valuation and scale factors rebounded marginally [3] - **Factor Rotation Speed**: The cross - section rotation speed of factors increased month - on - month and is currently in the medium percentile range of the past year [3] Style Timing Model - The financial style rebounded marginally this week, and the current signal continues to be the stable style. The return rate of the style timing strategy last week was 0.56%, and the excess return rate compared with the benchmark balanced allocation was 1.13% [3]

Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the content Core Viewpoints of the Report - The Middle East situation remains tense and complex, with the conflict entering a costly war of attrition. The risk of financial market volatility persists, but the direct impact on the Asian economy may gradually weaken as Asian vessels gain passage through the Strait of Hormuz and oil prices decline. The market is in a period of repeated fluctuations [3][11][12]. - In terms of asset allocation, it is recommended to focus on three main lines: sectors driven by domestic policies and in an upward industrial cycle, such as power grid equipment and lithium - battery materials; technology tracks with long - term growth potential and relatively low valuations, including computing infrastructure, semiconductor equipment and materials; and low - valuation value sectors like coal, chemicals, and finance. In the short term, it is advisable to control positions and seize structural opportunities while waiting for external risks to become clearer [3][12]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Weekly Market Observation 1.1. Equity Market Review and Observation - Last week (2026.03.23 - 2026.03.27), the A - share market was under short - term pressure due to external disturbances. The market adjusted significantly in the first half of the week and gradually recovered in the second half, with increased trading activity. The average daily trading volume of the entire A - share market was 21,093 billion yuan, a decrease compared to the previous week [11]. - The market hotspots were concentrated in sectors driven by fundamental improvements or external events. The top - performing industries included basic chemicals, non - ferrous metals, public utilities, and pharmaceutical biology. Innovative drugs and lithium - battery new energy were the leading sectors throughout the week [11]. - The Middle East situation continued to evolve in a highly tense and complex manner. The conflict has entered a costly war of attrition, and there is a risk of the region falling into an all - out melee [11]. - In the short term, the Iran - US conflict may lead to repeated attacks before April 6, bringing significant volatility to the financial market. However, the direct impact on the Asian economy may gradually weaken [3][12]. 1.2. Pan - Fixed - Income Market Review and Observation - Last week (2026.03.23 - 2026.03.27), the bond market oscillated and recovered. The yields of 1 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year treasury bonds decreased by 0.50BP, 1.27BP, and 3.84BP respectively, to 1.25%, 1.82%, and 2.35% [4][13]. - The US Treasury yield curve steepened. The 1 - year US Treasury yield decreased by 3BP to 3.77%, the 2 - year yield remained flat, and the 10 - year yield increased by 5BP to 4.44% [14]. - The CSI REITs Total Return Index fell 0.83% last week, with warehousing logistics and industrial parks among the sectors with the largest declines. In the primary market, 4 new public REITs made progress [14]. 2. Fund Index Performance Tracking 2.1. Equity Strategy Theme - Based Index - **Active Equity Fund Selection**: The index selects 15 funds each period, with equal - weight allocation. The core positions select active equity funds based on performance competitiveness and style stability, and the style distribution is roughly balanced according to the CSI Equity - Oriented Fund Index [18]. - **Value - Oriented Equity Fund Selection**: The index includes both deep - value and quality - value styles. It selects 10 funds of deep - value, quality - value, and balanced - value styles based on multi - period style classification [18]. - **Balanced Equity Fund Selection**: The index selects 10 relatively balanced and value - growth style funds based on multi - period style classification. Fund managers in this style balance the valuation and growth of individual stocks and consider cost - effectiveness at the industry level [21]. - **Growth - Oriented Equity Fund Selection**: The index aims to capture the performance and valuation double - click opportunities of high - growth companies and selects 10 funds of active - growth, quality - growth, and balanced - growth styles based on multi - period style classification [23][25]. - **Pharmaceutical Equity Fund Selection**: The index selects funds based on the intersection market value ratio of fund equity holdings and the constituent stocks of the representative index (CITIC Pharmaceutical). It constructs an evaluation system and selects 15 funds to form the index [27]. - **Consumer Equity Fund Selection**: The index selects funds based on the intersection market value ratio of fund equity holdings and the constituent stocks of representative consumer - related indices. It constructs an evaluation system and selects 10 funds to form the index [30]. - **Technology Equity Fund Selection**: The index selects funds based on the intersection market value ratio of fund equity holdings and the constituent stocks of representative technology - related indices. It constructs an evaluation system and selects 10 funds to form the index [34]. - **High - end Manufacturing Equity Fund Selection**: The index selects funds based on the intersection market value ratio of fund equity holdings and the constituent stocks of representative high - end manufacturing indices. It constructs an evaluation system and selects 10 funds to form the index [37]. - **Cyclical Equity Fund Selection**: The index selects funds based on the intersection market value ratio of fund equity holdings and the constituent stocks of representative cyclical indices. It constructs an evaluation system and selects 5 funds to form the index [39]. 2.2. Other Fund Indices - **Money - Market Enhancement Index**: The money - market enhancement strategy index aims for liquidity management, pursues a curve that outperforms money - market funds, and is mainly configured with money - market funds and inter - bank certificate of deposit index funds. The performance benchmark is the CSI Money - Market Fund Index [45]. - **Pure - Bond Index**: - **Short - Term Bond Fund Selection**: The index aims for liquidity management and selects 5 funds with stable long - term returns, strict回撤 control, and significant absolute return capabilities. The performance benchmark is a combination of the short - term pure - bond fund index and the common money - market fund index [47]. - **Medium - and Long - Term Bond Fund Selection**: The index invests in medium - and long - term pure - bond funds, aiming for stable returns while controlling回撤. It selects 5 funds that balance coupon strategies and band - trading operations and adjusts the duration and the ratio of credit - bond funds and interest - rate - bond funds according to market conditions [50]. - **Fixed - Income Plus Index**: - **Low - Volatility Fixed - Income Plus Selection**: The index has an equity central position of 10%, selects 10 funds with an equity central position (considering convertible bond and stock positions) of less than 15% in the past three years and recently. The performance benchmark is a combination of the CSI 800 Index and the ChinaBond New Composite Full - Price Index [53]. - **Medium - Volatility Fixed - Income Plus Selection**: The index has an equity central position of 20%, selects 5 funds with an equity central position between 15% - 25% in the past three years and recently. The performance benchmark is a combination of the CSI 800 Index and the ChinaBond New Composite Full - Price Index [55]. - **High - Volatility Fixed - Income Plus Selection**: The index has an equity central position of 30%, selects 5 funds with an equity central position between 25% - 35% in the past three years and recently. The performance benchmark is a combination of the CSI 800 Index and the ChinaBond New Composite Full - Price Index [56]. - **Other Pan - Fixed - Income Indices**: - **Convertible Bond Fund Selection**: The index selects 5 convertible - bond funds based on investment proportion requirements and an evaluation system considering fund product, fund manager, and fund company dimensions [61]. - **QDII Bond Fund Selection**: The index selects 6 QDII bond funds with stable returns and good risk control based on credit and duration conditions [64]. - **REITs Fund Selection**: The index selects 10 REITs funds with stable operation, reasonable valuation, and certain elasticity based on the underlying asset types [65].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided 2. Core Views - From March 23 to March 27, 2026, all major equity market indices declined, with the ChiNext Index experiencing the largest drop of 1.68%. Among the 31 Shenwan primary industries, 9 industries rose, with non - ferrous metals, public utilities, chemicals, pharmaceutical and biological, and textile and apparel being the top five gainers, while non - bank finance, computer, agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, beauty care, and national defense and military industry were the top five losers [1][12] - The scale of public funds exceeded 38 trillion yuan, and the total scale of private funds reached 22.60 trillion yuan. The equity market is still in an oscillating adjustment phase. Among them, the decline of equity - biased funds was the smallest, with an average decline of 0.31% and a positive return ratio of 32.20%; the average return of fixed - income + funds was 0.05%, with a positive return ratio of 58.03%; the average return of pure - bond funds was 0.07%, with a positive return ratio of 98.49%; the average return of pension target FOF was - 0.02%, with a positive return ratio of 45.73%. In addition, the average return of QDII funds was - 0.57%, with a positive return ratio of 27.70% [2][28][29] - Last week, the overall ETF market had a net capital outflow of 6.679 billion yuan. Structurally, bond - type ETFs had a significant net inflow of 21.479 billion yuan. In terms of liquidity, the average daily trading volume of the overall ETF market last week reached 532.374 billion yuan, the average daily trading volume reached 222.049 billion shares, and the average daily turnover rate was 9.31% [3][40] - Last week, 25 new funds were issued, the same as the previous period; 51 new funds were established, an increase of 5 compared to the previous period. New funds raised a total of 26.149 billion yuan, a decrease of 8.033 billion yuan compared to the previous period [4][51] 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Market Review 3.1.1 Domestic Market Situation - From March 23 to March 27, 2026, all major equity market indices declined, with the ChiNext Index dropping 1.68%. Among the 31 Shenwan primary industries, 9 industries rose, with non - ferrous metals, public utilities, chemicals, pharmaceutical and biological, and textile and apparel being the top five gainers, while non - bank finance, computer, agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, beauty care, and national defense and military industry were the top five losers. In the bond market, the ChinaBond Composite Full - Price Index rose 0.04%, the total full - price indices of ChinaBond Treasury bonds, financial bonds, and credit bonds fluctuated between a decline of 0.02% and an increase of 0.02%, the China Securities Convertible Bond Index rose 1.28%, and in the commodity market, the Nanhua Commodity Index fell 0.25% [12] 3.1.2 European, American and Asia - Pacific Market Situation - Last week, most major indices in European, American and Asia - Pacific markets declined. Among them, in the US stock market, the S&P 500 Index fell 1.56%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.99%, and the Nasdaq Index fell 3.23%; in the European market, the French CAC40 rose 0.47%, and the German DAX fell 0.35%; in the Asia - Pacific market, the Hang Seng Index fell 1.29%, and the Nikkei 225 remained unchanged [18] 3.1.3 Market Valuation Situation - Last week, the valuation quantiles of most major market indices declined. In terms of the historical quantiles of price - to - earnings ratio, the Shanghai Composite 50 Index had the largest decline of 3.8 pct.; in terms of the historical quantiles of price - to - book ratio, the Shanghai Composite 50 Index also had the largest decline of 17.1 pct. Among industries, the top five industries with the highest historical quantiles of price - to - earnings ratio in the Shenwan primary index last week were real estate, building materials, comprehensive, chemicals, and electronics. Among them, the price - to - earnings ratio quantile of the real estate industry remained at a high level, and the price - to - earnings ratio quantile of the building materials industry reached 86.8%. Attention should be paid to the potential correction risk in the future. The five industries with relatively low historical quantiles of price - to - earnings ratio last week were non - bank finance, food and beverage, household appliances, agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, and beauty care. Among them, the valuation of the non - bank finance industry was close to the historical low since 2013 [21] 3.2 Active Public Fund Situation 3.2.1 Market Hotspots - The scale of public funds exceeded 38 trillion yuan. As of the end of February 2026, there were 165 public fund management institutions in China, including 150 fund management companies and 15 asset management institutions with public fund management qualifications. The total net asset value of public funds managed by these institutions was 38.61 trillion yuan. The total number of funds in the market reached 13,821, an increase of 96 compared to the end of January. The share and net value increased to 32,768.6 billion shares and 38,605.2 billion yuan respectively, with a month - on - month increase of about 2.7% and 2.2% respectively, indicating a net inflow of funds. The capital structure showed the characteristics of continuous capital inflow into fixed - income and cash management funds, short - term pressure on equity funds, and increasing cross - border allocation. The market risk appetite was still in the process of recovery but had not fully rebounded [28] - The total scale of private funds reached 22.60 trillion yuan. As of the end of February 2026, the outstanding scale of private funds was 22.60 trillion yuan, continuing the steady expansion trend since 2025 and maintaining at a historical high level. The number of outstanding funds was 140,300, and the industry's capital - carrying capacity remained stable. Structurally, the scale of private equity investment funds was 11.16 trillion yuan, accounting for nearly half, still being the core support; the scale of private securities investment funds was 7.35 trillion yuan, showing strong elasticity in the context of market recovery; the scale of venture capital funds was 3.80 trillion yuan, continuing to play a supplementary role [29] 3.2.2 Fund Performance - The equity market is still in an oscillating adjustment phase. The decline of equity - biased funds was the smallest, with an average decline of 0.31% and a positive return ratio of 32.20%; the average return of fixed - income + funds was 0.05%, with a positive return ratio of 58.03%; the average return of pure - bond funds was 0.07%, with a positive return ratio of 98.49%; the average return of pension target FOF was - 0.02%, with a positive return ratio of 45.73%. In addition, the average return of QDII funds was - 0.57%, with a positive return ratio of 27.70% [2][29] 3.2.3 Industry Position and Overall Position of Active Equity Funds - Through the calculation of the industry positions of active equity funds, the top three industries with the largest increase in positions last week were basic chemicals, coal, and electronics; the top three industries with the largest decrease in positions were banks, public utilities, and transportation. The overall position of active equity funds on March 27, 2026, was 77.29%, an increase of 5.61 pct. compared to the previous period [2][37][38] 3.3 ETF Fund Situation - Last week, the overall ETF market had a net capital outflow of 6.679 billion yuan. Structurally, bond - type ETFs had a significant net inflow of 21.479 billion yuan. In terms of liquidity, the average daily trading volume of the overall ETF market last week reached 532.374 billion yuan, the average daily trading volume reached 222.049 billion shares, and the average daily turnover rate was 9.31%. In terms of individual bonds, last week, funds showed the characteristics of risk aversion and concentration on core assets at the index level: funds significantly flowed into low - risk and broad - based large - cap indices such as CSI AAA Science and Technology Innovation Corporate Bonds, short - term financing bonds, and CSI 300, while high - elasticity sectors such as chemicals, Hong Kong stock Internet, and CSI 1000 continued to experience outflows, indicating a decline in overall risk appetite and a more conservative allocation [3][40][44] 3.4 Fund Issuance Situation Statistics - Last week, 25 new funds were issued in China, the same as the previous period. Among them, there were 9 active equity - biased funds and 11 passive index funds. All 11 passive index funds were equity - type, mainly tracking indices such as CSI Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Artificial Intelligence, CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Information Technology Composite, CSI All - Share Household Appliances, and CSI All - Share Electric Power and Public Utilities. Currently, the issuance share of active equity funds is still at a historical low, but there has been an obvious upward trend since this year. 51 new funds were established last week, an increase of 5 compared to the previous period. New funds raised a total of 26.149 billion yuan, a decrease of 8.033 billion yuan compared to the previous period. Among them, Tianhong Honghua Hybrid A managed by Hu Yu had the largest fundraising scale, approximately 4.087 billion yuan [4][48][51]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No information provided in the given content 2. Core View of the Report - Last week (3/23 - 3/27), bond - type ETFs had a net inflow of 21.5 billion yuan. Credit - bond ETFs, interest - rate bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs had net inflows of 19.7 billion yuan, 3.1 billion yuan, and a net outflow of 1.3 billion yuan respectively. Their cumulative unit net value weekly changes were +0.06%, +0.12%, and +1.02% [2][14]. - Thanks to the scarcity support of short - and medium - term coupon assets due to supply contraction and the demand support from "asset relocation" of wealth management products and continuous acceptance by public funds, credit bonds maintained strong resilience in the recent volatile market [31]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Issuance Progress Tracking - There were no newly issued bond ETFs last week [3][18]. 3.2 Stock Product Tracking - As of March 27, 2026, the circulating market values of interest - rate bond ETFs, credit - bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs were 130.4 billion yuan, 401.1 billion yuan, and 72.8 billion yuan respectively, with credit - bond ETFs accounting for 66% of the total. Haifutong CSI Short - term Financing ETF and Boshi Convertible - bond ETF had the top two circulating market values, at 91.4 billion yuan and 60.7 billion yuan respectively [4][20]. - Compared with last week, the circulating market values of interest - rate bond ETFs, credit - bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs increased by 3.3 billion yuan, 18.3 billion yuan, and decreased by 0.5 billion yuan respectively. Products with significant scale increases last week included Harvest CSI AAA Science and Technology Innovation Corporate Bond ETF, Haifutong CSI Short - term Financing ETF, and Southern CSI AAA Science and Technology Innovation Corporate Bond ETF, with increases of 6.2 billion yuan, 4.3 billion yuan, and 3.3 billion yuan respectively [4][20]. - Among credit - bond ETFs, the circulating market values of benchmark - making credit - bond ETFs and science - and - technology innovation bond ETFs were 100.9 billion yuan and 277.5 billion yuan respectively, increasing by 0.5 billion yuan and 12.3 billion yuan compared with last week. The scale of science - and - technology innovation bond ETFs ended a ten - week decline [4][22]. 3.3 ETF Performance Tracking - The cumulative unit net values of interest - rate bond ETFs and credit - bond ETFs closed at 1.19 and 1.03 respectively. The benchmark - making credit - bond ETF's return since its establishment has marginally climbed to 1.89%, and the science - and - technology innovation bond ETF's return since its establishment has risen to 0.85% [5][23][31]. 3.4 Premium/Discount Rate Tracking - Last week, the average premium/discount rates of credit - bond ETFs, interest - rate bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs were - 0.03%, - 0.01%, and - 0.10% respectively. The average trading price of credit - bond ETFs was lower than the fund's unit net value, indicating low allocation sentiment. Specifically, the weekly average premium/discount rates of benchmark - making credit - bond ETFs and science - and - technology innovation bond ETFs were - 0.07% and - 0.03% respectively, and the discount rates continued to converge [6][35]. 3.5 Turnover Rate Tracking - Last week, the turnover rate ranked as convertible - bond ETFs > interest - rate bond ETFs > credit - bond ETFs. The weekly turnover rate of convertible - bond ETFs improved to 155%, while those of interest - rate and credit - bond ETFs slightly declined to 144% and 96% respectively. Products with high turnover rates included Huaxia Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark - making Treasury Bond ETF, Guotai CSI AAA Science and Technology Innovation Corporate Bond ETF, and Haifutong Shanghai Stock Exchange 5 - year Local Government Bond ETF [7][40].

Core Viewpoint - In an era of information overload and accelerated style rotation, capturing excess returns in investment has become increasingly challenging, prompting a search for effective strategies [1] Group 1: Fund Performance - The fund managed by Chen Cong, Xingquan Hong Kong-Shenzhen Two-Year Holding Mixed Fund, has achieved a net value growth of 39.13% over the past year, surpassing its performance benchmark by 17.67 percentage points, ranking 14th out of 43 in its category [3] - Another fund independently managed by Chen, Xingquan Hexi Mixed A, has recorded a return of 21.82% since its establishment on June 27, 2025, until March 25, 2026 [3] Group 2: Investment Philosophy - Chen Cong's investment methodology combines a strong "Xingquan imprint" with a disciplined approach derived from quantitative analysis, focusing on sectors such as the internet, innovative pharmaceuticals, technology hardware, and new consumption [3][6] - His investment framework emphasizes industry aesthetics and portfolio discipline, with a focus on company culture, organizational structure, and management cognition in light asset industries, while prioritizing performance tracking in sectors undergoing significant development [7][8] Group 3: Market Insights - Chen identifies critical points in industry trends, focusing on capturing the upward Beta before uncovering undervalued Alpha opportunities, particularly in sectors like AI and storage [10][11] - His approach to investing in the storage sector involved recognizing supply tightness early and identifying a leading storage company with significant advantages, leading to a strong investment decision [11] Group 4: Risk Management - The investment strategy incorporates risk management from the outset, ensuring a balanced exposure across sub-sectors and maintaining a clear delineation of asset positioning within the portfolio [14] - Chen emphasizes the importance of adjusting positions in response to extreme macroeconomic events to mitigate tail risks, prioritizing the reduction of high Beta stocks during such times [14] Group 5: Long-term Vision - The overarching goal is to deliver attractive long-term performance, with a belief that true growth will ultimately be validated over time, despite market fluctuations [15]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the document. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The scale of bond ETFs has significantly increased, with credit - bond ETFs contributing the main increment. Last week, the net inflow of funds into interest - rate bond ETFs, credit - bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs was 3.145 billion yuan, 19.669 billion yuan, and - 1.336 billion yuan respectively, with a total net inflow of 21.479 billion yuan in the bond ETF market [1][4]. - The scale trend of convertible - bond ETFs is differentiated, and science - innovation bond ETFs have received a large inflow of funds. Last week, the convertible - bond ETFs had a net redemption of 1.336 billion yuan, while the science - innovation bond ETFs had a net inflow of 12.058 billion yuan [1][5]. - After the end of the quarter, attention should be focused on the change of the liquidity center in April. Due to the upcoming tax period in April, combined with the rhythm of fiscal expenditure and the supply pressure of the bond market, there is a need to be vigilant about the disturbance of the short - and medium - duration products caused by the structural tightness of funds. The bond ETF market may maintain the current duration strategy, and the scale may tilt towards defensive varieties [1][6]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 各类债券 ETF 资金净流入情况 - The scale of bond ETFs has grown significantly, and credit - bond ETFs contribute the main increment. As of March 27, 2026, the bond ETF fund scale was 748.058 billion yuan, up 3.13% from the previous week's closing, down 9.79% from the beginning of the year, and accounting for 14.84% of the total market ETF scale, with a 62bp increase from the previous weekend [1][4]. - The convertible - bond ETFs had a net redemption of 1.336 billion yuan last week, with the inflows of Convertible Bond ETF Haifutong and Convertible Bond ETF Boshi being + 528 million yuan and - 1.864 billion yuan respectively. The science - innovation bond ETFs had a net inflow of 12.058 billion yuan, followed by short - term financing ETFs and urban investment bond ETFs, with net inflows of 4.33 billion yuan and 2.786 billion yuan respectively last week [1][5]. 3.2 各类债券 ETF 份额走势 - As of the close on March 27, 2026, the shares of various types of bond ETFs such as treasury bond, policy - financial bond, local bond, benchmark market - making credit bond, science - innovation bond, corporate bond, short - term financing, urban investment bond, and convertible - bond ETFs were 601.05 million shares, 358.51 million shares, 163.16 million shares, 986.20 million shares, 2716.21 million shares, 339.96 million shares, 797.53 million shares, 3614.38 million shares, and 5417.95 million shares respectively, with changes of 1.0%, 2.0%, 0.9%, - 0.1%, 3.1%, 0.1%, 3.7%, 4.9%, - 0.3% compared with March 20, 2026, and the total share of bond - type ETFs changed by + 1.9%. Compared with the end of last month, the total share of bond - type ETFs changed by 3.5% [11]. 3.3 各基准做市信用债 ETF 份额及净值走势 - Among the existing 8 credit - bond ETFs, the share of Corporate Bond ETF Southern led the increase. As of the close on March 27, 2026, the shares of these 8 ETFs were 99.46 million shares, 80.41 million shares, 97.44 million shares, 96.47 million shares, 184.72 million shares, 203.30 million shares, 89.00 million shares, and 141.32 million shares respectively, with changes of no change, - 2.43%, - 2.01%, no change, 5.66%, - 0.10%, - 1.11%, no change compared with March 20, 2026 [17]. - The net value of these 8 credit - bond ETFs continued to rise. As of the close on March 27, 2026, the net values were 1.0217, 1.0210, 1.0195, 1.0198, 1.0148, 1.0179, 1.0187, and 1.0178 respectively, with changes of 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.07%, 0.07%, 0.07% compared with March 20, 2026, and changes of 0.24%, 0.25%, 0.25%, 0.25%, 0.25%, 0.26%, 0.24%, 0.25% compared with the end of last month [20]. 3.4 各科创债 ETF 份额及净值走势 - The net subscription shares of science - innovation bond ETFs turned positive significantly, and funds were concentrated in AAA - rated science - innovation bond products. Among the 24 existing science - innovation bond ETFs, the share had a net inflow of 119.91 million shares last week, up 4.55% from the previous week. The top three products in terms of share as of March 27, 2026, were Science - Innovation Bond ETF Harvest, Science - Innovation Bond ETF Huaxia, and Science - Innovation Bond ETF Penghua, with 278.00 million shares, 210.14 million shares, and 189.81 million shares respectively. The top three in terms of net inflow of shares were Science - Innovation Bond ETF Harvest, Science - Innovation Bond ETF Southern, and Science - Innovation Bond ETF Huaxia, all of which are products tracking the AAA science - innovation bond index [23]. - The net value increase of science - innovation bond ETFs widened. As of the close on March 27, 2026, the top - ranked products in terms of net value among the 24 science - innovation bond ETFs were Science - Innovation Bond ETF Wanjia, Science - Innovation Bond ETF Invesco Great Wall, and Science - Innovation Bond ETF Huatai - Peregrine, with net values of 1.0114, 1.0112, and 1.0112 respectively. The median net values of the first - batch and second - batch science - innovation bond ETFs last week were 1.0066 and 1.0096 respectively, up 0.06% from the previous week's closing. The median net values of products tracking the AAA science - innovation bond, Shanghai AAA science - innovation bond, and Shenzhen AAA science - innovation bond were 1.0089, 1.0074, and 1.0113 respectively, up 0.06% from the previous week's closing [31]. 3.5 上周单只债券 ETF 市场表现情况 - The net values of all bond ETF products rose last week. Convertible Bond ETF Boshi and Convertible Bond ETF Haifutong led the increase, up 1.22% and 0.81% respectively from the previous week, followed by 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF Penghua and 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF Boshi, up 0.54% and 0.51% respectively [38]. - In terms of the premium - discount rate, Science - Innovation Bond ETF Harvest, Urban Investment Bond ETF Haifutong, and Convertible Bond ETF Haifutong led with premium rates of + 0.036%, + 0.039%, and + 0.035% respectively. In terms of scale change, Science - Innovation Bond ETF Harvest (+ 6.171 billion yuan), Short - Term Financing ETF Haifutong (+ 4.33 billion yuan), and Science - Innovation Bond ETF Southern (+ 3.245 billion yuan) had the largest net inflows, while Convertible Bond ETF Boshi had a relatively large net outflow of - 1.864 billion yuan last week [38]. 3.6 基准做市信用债和科创债 ETF 的 PCF 清单边际变化 - For the PCF list of benchmark market - making credit - bond ETFs last week, among the products tracking the Shanghai market - making credit - bond index, Corporate Bond ETF Southern and Credit - Bond ETF Haifutong added 14 and 11 bonds to their PCF lists respectively, with the average modified durations of the newly added bonds being 3.65 years and 3.42 years respectively. Bond 21 Yuegao 01 was repeatedly removed from the PCF list of benchmark market - making credit - bond ETFs because it was about to mature, and Bond 25 Guolian K1 was included in the PCF lists of multiple products, with a modified duration of 3.9360 years [40]. - For the PCF list of science - innovation bond ETFs last week, the average duration of the newly added bonds of Science - Innovation Bond ETF Tianhong was relatively large, at 7.74 years. Science - Innovation Bond ETF Southern added a total of 144 bonds to its PCF list throughout the week due to a large inflow of funds (+ 3.245 billion yuan) [41]. - Bond 23 Gan Jiao K1 and other 2 bonds were repeatedly removed from the PCF lists of science - innovation bond ETFs, and 19 bonds such as 26 Yue Huan GK1 were included in the PCF lists of multiple science - innovation bond ETFs [44]. 3.7 债券 ETF 基金运营管理规则变更汇总 - In terms of the cash - substitution flag, Science - Innovation Bond ETF Huaxia changed all the cash - substitution flags of its PCF list to "must" on March 24 and March 25, 2026, and the net outflow amount of the product was 30 million yuan on both days [45].