Group 1 - The Shenzhen Cultural Industries Fair showcases the intersection of traditional culture and cutting-edge technology, highlighting diverse business opportunities in new sectors, leveraging "culture + technology" to tap into a market worth billions [1] - A hand-crafted wearable armor from Jiangsu Donghai County became a focal point at the fair, featuring micro-sculpting techniques inspired by the "Along the River During the Qingming Festival," demonstrating the fusion of traditional craftsmanship with modern cultural expressions [1] - The fair featured multiple companies showcasing AI applications based on large models, such as automatic video editing and travel log generation, significantly enhancing content creation efficiency and offering innovative services for tourists [1] Group 2 - The PICO mixed reality all-in-one device by Xiaoniao Kankan Technology has been applied in cultural tourism scenarios like the Dunhuang Mogao Caves, allowing visitors to immerse themselves in historical experiences and interact with virtual guides [2] - The newly established "Creative Workshop Experience Zone" at the fair attracted a large number of young participants engaging in traditional crafts like wood carving and cloisonné, indicating a trend where niche markets are innovatively merging technology and culture to reshape consumer experiences [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of a multi-dimensional technology assessment framework for evaluating the applicability of technology in cultural projects, focusing on cultural preservation and innovation [1][2]. Group 1: Multi-Dimensional Assessment Framework - The framework consists of five core dimensions: cultural value, user experience, technical feasibility, economic sustainability, and social impact [3][4][5]. - Cultural value dimension assesses whether technology enhances cultural expression without altering its essence, particularly in areas like intangible cultural heritage [3]. - User experience dimension focuses on the seamless integration of technology into cultural narratives to enhance emotional engagement [3]. - Technical feasibility dimension evaluates the maturity, usability, and long-term stability of the technology [4]. - Economic sustainability dimension analyzes cost-effectiveness, market potential, and scalability of the technology [4]. - Social impact dimension considers the alignment of technology with cultural policies and its broader societal implications [5]. Group 2: Success and Failure Analysis - Successful technology applications balance all five dimensions, while failures often stem from significant issues in one or more dimensions [6]. - Examples illustrate that technologies like VR can fail if they do not authentically represent cultural nuances, leading to a distorted understanding of cultural heritage [6][7]. Group 3: Practical Six-Step Evaluation Framework - The six-step framework includes: 1. Demand analysis to identify core problems and audience needs [8]. 2. Cultural adaptability assessment to ensure technology accurately expresses cultural essence [8]. 3. User experience testing through prototypes and feedback [8]. 4. Technical feasibility analysis to evaluate maturity and maintenance [9]. 5. Economic sustainability assessment focusing on ROI and operational costs [10]. 6. Social impact evaluation regarding compliance with cultural policies [11]. Group 4: Strategies to Avoid Common Pitfalls - Key strategies include prioritizing cultural values over technology, conducting small-scale trials for iterative improvements, fostering cross-disciplinary collaboration, establishing user feedback mechanisms, and focusing on long-term cultural and social benefits rather than short-term trends [13][14][15][16][17]. Group 5: Conclusion - The integration of technology and culture requires a thoughtful dialogue that respects cultural integrity while leveraging technological advancements to enhance cultural vitality [18].