7月28日，生态环境部举行例行新闻发布会。 生态环境部自然生态保护司司长张玉军在发布会上介绍，近年来，生态环境部扎实推进生态保护与修复 监管，积极开展生态文明示范创建，取得多方面成果。 在全力推动生态文明示范建设提档升级方面，生态环境部对生态文明建设示范区和"绿水青山就是金山 银山"实践创新基地建设成效进行了总结，提炼形成多种转化路径和实践模式，编制"绿水青山就是金山 银山"实践模式典型案例。 在持续开展生态状况调查评估和生态保护与修复成效评价方面，目前已完成黄河流域等重点区域专题评 估和"十三五"山水林田湖草沙生态保护修复工程生态环境成效试点评估。 生态环境部新闻发言人裴晓菲在发布会上回答媒体记者提问时表示，生态环境行政检查一头连着政府， 一头连着企业，对优化营商环境、确保企业正常生产经营有着重要影响。减少对企业的现场检查，不意 味着不监管，不意味着放纵违法行为，而是进一步提升检查的规范性和精准度，确保生态环境领域行政 检查既不缺位，也不越位。 强化分级分类差异化监管 近期，生态环境部印发了《关于严格规范生态环境行政检查大力提升执法质效的通知》，要求进一步规 范生态环境行政检查，减轻企业负担。在当前形势下， ...

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Ecology and Environment has issued a notification aimed at standardizing environmental inspections, reducing the burden on enterprises while ensuring effective regulatory oversight [1][2][3] Group 1: Administrative Inspection Guidelines - The notification emphasizes the need for coordinated administrative inspections to avoid multiple and redundant checks, thereby alleviating the burden on enterprises [1] - Daily inspections should be planned annually and detailed monthly, adhering to the maximum frequency limits set by local authorities [1] - The notification aims to enhance the quality and effectiveness of on-site inspections by preparing in advance and predicting potential pollution risks [1] Group 2: Case and Special Inspections - Case inspections should be precise and scientific, with non-site inspections prioritized to minimize disruptions to enterprises [2] - Special inspections must be legally justified, with strict controls on their number, scope, content, and duration, ensuring transparency through timely public announcements [2] - The shift towards a smart enforcement system allows for remote monitoring of pollution levels, reducing the need for physical inspections [2] Group 3: Enforcement and Compliance - The notification does not imply leniency towards violations; it mandates strict penalties for serious and malicious infractions [3] - The focus will be on punishing severe violations such as illegal discharges and tampering with monitoring data, ensuring that enforcement resources are directed towards high-risk entities [3] - The Ministry aims to enhance the precision and standardization of inspections to improve environmental quality and optimize the business environment [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the importance of "strengthening identification management" as a significant measure to reconstruct the enforcement and regulatory logic in ecological environment supervision [1] - The initiative aims to convert various factors such as distribution areas, industry types, pollutant types, violation records, and public complaints into quantifiable and traceable "digital identifiers" [1] - This identification management approach seeks to optimize limited enforcement resources and provide a basis for differentiated and precise regulation, ensuring that enforcement efforts are aligned with environmental risk levels [1][2] Group 2 - The establishment of labels should be tailored to local conditions, creating a management framework that reflects regional characteristics, industry-specific pollutants, and historical violation records [2] - Data integration requires multi-party collaboration to transform fragmented regulatory elements into structured governance language, creating multidimensional "digital files" for regulatory subjects [2] - The dynamic maintenance of labels is crucial for ensuring their timeliness and accuracy, necessitating a regular maintenance mechanism to avoid one-time efforts [3] Group 3 - Enhancing capabilities involves multiple measures, including collaboration with research institutions and technology companies to support the design of label systems and data anomaly analysis [4] - Regular training for enforcement personnel on label classification, data entry, and risk assessment is recommended to improve practical application skills [4] - Incorporating identification management into the performance evaluation system for grassroots enforcement can promote proactive exploration and gradual deepening of this management approach [4]

Group 1 - The current initiative aims to standardize environmental law enforcement related to enterprises, enhancing regulatory efficiency and improving the business environment [1] - Some local ecological environment departments have paused regular inspections and enforcement actions during this initiative to avoid attracting attention from higher authorities, which contradicts the initiative's purpose [1] - The goal is not to stop enforcement but to eliminate disorder and randomness in environmental law enforcement, ensuring a more lenient regulatory environment for enterprises [1] Group 2 - To achieve standardized regulation and reduce on-site inspections, technological supervision methods are essential [2] - Local ecological environment departments should encourage enterprises to build modern environmental management systems and connect relevant equipment with local authorities [2] - On-site inspections must adhere to strict procedural norms, including prior requests, video recording, and post-reporting, to ensure compliance with legal responsibilities [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the challenges faced by county-level ecological environment departments in China, particularly in managing environmental protection tasks amidst limited resources and increasing responsibilities [2][3]. Group 1: Current Situation - Fengqing County in Yunnan Province has a large area of approximately 3,335 square kilometers and a population of over 380,000, with nearly 29,000 market entities as of the end of 2022 [1]. - There are about 4,000 enterprises and projects under environmental regulation, while the local ecological environment bureau has only 19 staff members, leading to a significant disparity between regulatory personnel and the number of entities to be managed [1]. Group 2: Challenges Faced - The ecological environment issues are becoming increasingly complex, and there is a lack of collaboration among departments, making it difficult to balance high-quality development with high-level protection [2]. - County-level ecological environment departments must fulfill both city-level directives and local government tasks, which adds to their workload and complicates their operational efficiency [2][3]. Group 3: Proposed Solutions - The article suggests enhancing the management of administrative personnel and establishing clear responsibilities and processes to improve operational efficiency [4][5]. - It emphasizes the need for a robust evaluation mechanism to clarify duties and responsibilities within county-level ecological environment agencies [5]. - The establishment of a "system + technology" regulatory model is recommended to improve data management and enhance oversight capabilities [6]. - Strengthening professional training and inter-county collaboration for ecological enforcement personnel is also proposed to improve the overall effectiveness of environmental governance [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the increasing adoption of non-site law enforcement in ecological environment regulation, highlighting its advantages over traditional enforcement methods and the need for improvements in infrastructure and personnel training to maximize its effectiveness [1][2]. Group 1: Advantages of Non-Site Law Enforcement - Non-site law enforcement significantly enhances regulatory coverage, allowing limited enforcement resources to achieve greater effectiveness [1]. - It utilizes technology to secure evidence, reducing human intervention and minimizing arbitrary enforcement issues [1]. - The approach enables real-time monitoring of corporate emissions and data analysis to predict environmental risks, facilitating a shift towards more precise and intelligent ecological governance [1]. Group 2: Challenges and Recommendations - Current challenges include insufficient monitoring equipment coverage, weak data system support, and inadequate capabilities of enforcement personnel [1]. - Recommendations include expanding monitoring network coverage and enhancing the intelligence level of online monitoring systems, ensuring high-quality standards in equipment procurement and installation [2]. - There is a call for the establishment of a reliable anti-cheating network to prevent companies from evading regulation through data manipulation [2].

Group 1 - The ecological environment bureau of Kaifeng City is committed to enhancing the business environment and supporting high-quality economic development through effective ecological management and supervision [1][4] - The bureau has implemented a "release, management, and service" reform in environmental impact assessments (EIA), providing clear guidance and professional assistance to enterprises for project implementation [1][2] - The bureau actively responds to enterprise needs and adopts a tolerant and prudent approach to resolve issues, thereby optimizing the business environment for sustainable development [1][2] Group 2 - The bureau employs a categorized approach to enforce environmental regulations, focusing on industries with significant pollution issues, such as sand and gravel yards and brick kilns, through training and compliance checks [2] - A four-step method is used to guide enterprises in improving their pollution prevention measures, which includes legal training, self-inspection, enforcement checks, and penalties for non-compliance [2] - Regular follow-up inspections are conducted to reinforce corporate responsibility and encourage enterprises to enhance their operational capabilities [2] Group 3 - The bureau utilizes technology for non-intrusive enforcement, including electricity monitoring, video surveillance, and drone inspections, to improve regulatory efficiency while minimizing disruption to business operations [3] - A specific case involved the use of drones to investigate complaints about paint odors, leading to the identification and penalization of a company violating air pollution laws [3] - This technological approach allows for effective environmental law enforcement while reducing the frequency of on-site inspections for multiple enterprises [3] Group 4 - Looking ahead, the bureau aims to innovate service methods and enhance service quality while continuing to strengthen supervision and enforcement to ensure coordinated development of the economy and ecological environment in Tongxu County [4]