Core Insights - The Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) is a passively managed ETF launched on October 12, 2006, designed for long-term investors seeking broad exposure to the Technology - Broad segment of the equity market [1][10] - PTF has amassed assets over $368.03 million and aims to match the performance of the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index [3][4] - The ETF has an annual operating expense of 0.6% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.22% [5] Sector and Holdings - PTF primarily invests in the Information Technology sector, which constitutes about 85.2% of its portfolio, with Telecom and Financials following [6] - The top three holdings include Cadence Design Systems Inc (5.09%), Palantir Technologies Inc, and Broadcom Inc, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 37.8% of total assets [7] Performance Metrics - Year-to-date, PTF has lost about 4.55% but is up roughly 21.96% over the last 12 months as of August 13, 2025 [8] - The ETF has a beta of 1.43 and a standard deviation of 31.5% for the trailing three-year period, indicating high risk [8] Alternatives - Other ETFs in the technology space include the Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) with $85.64 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.08%, and the Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) with $100.82 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.09% [11]

Core Insights - The Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) is designed to provide broad exposure to the Style Box - Large Cap Value category, launched on December 28, 2015 [1] Fund Overview - LVHD is sponsored by Franklin Templeton Investments and has assets exceeding $584.78 million, positioning it as an average-sized ETF in its category [5] - The fund aims to match the performance of the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index, focusing on profitable U.S. companies with high dividend yields and lower price and earnings volatility [5] Cost Structure - The annual operating expenses for LVHD are 0.27%, which is competitive within its peer group [6] - The ETF has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 3.34% [6] Sector Allocation and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation in the Utilities sector, comprising approximately 24.9% of the portfolio, followed by Consumer Staples and Real Estate [7] - Cisco Systems Inc (CSCO) represents about 2.65% of the fund's total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for roughly 25.11% of total assets [8] Performance Metrics - As of August 13, 2025, LVHD has increased by about 7.67% year-to-date and approximately 10.71% over the past year [10] - The fund has traded between $37.37 and $41.26 in the last 52 weeks, with a beta of 0.66 and a standard deviation of 13.37% over the trailing three-year period [10] Alternatives - Other ETFs in the same space include Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), with SCHD having $70.45 billion in assets and VTV at $140.9 billion [12] - SCHD has a lower expense ratio of 0.06%, while VTV charges 0.04%, making them potentially attractive alternatives for investors [12]

Core Insights - The SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) is a significant player in the Mid Cap Blend segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $23.09 billion, making it one of the larger ETFs in this category [1] Group 1: Mid Cap Blend Overview - Mid cap companies, with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, provide a balance of stability and growth potential, offering less risk and higher growth opportunities compared to small and large companies [2] - Blend ETFs hold a mix of growth and value stocks, exhibiting characteristics of both types of equities [2] Group 2: Costs and Performance - The annual operating expense ratio for MDY is 0.23%, which is competitive within its peer group, and it has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.18% [3] - MDY aims to match the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index, having gained approximately 2.72% year-to-date and about 10.49% over the past year, with a trading range of $468.22 to $620.12 in the last 52 weeks [6] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Industrials sector, comprising about 23.7% of the portfolio, followed by Financials and Consumer Discretionary [4] - The top 10 holdings represent around 7.15% of total assets, with Interactive Brokers Group Inc. and Emcor Group Inc. among the notable names [5] Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - MDY has a beta of 1.05 and a standard deviation of 19.55% over the trailing three-year period, categorizing it as a medium-risk investment [7] - Alternatives to MDY include the Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and the iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH), which have larger asset bases and lower expense ratios of 0.04% and 0.05%, respectively [9]

Core Insights - The JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is a passively managed ETF launched on April 14, 2020, with assets exceeding $1.89 billion, targeting the Mid Cap Blend segment of the US equity market [1][2] Mid Cap Blend Overview - Mid cap companies have market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, offering higher growth prospects than large cap companies while being less volatile than small cap companies, making them a stable investment option [2] Cost Structure - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.07%, positioning it as one of the lower-cost options in the market, with a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.27% [3] Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF's largest allocation is to the Industrials sector at approximately 21.5%, followed by Financials and Consumer Discretionary [4] - The top holding is Jpmorgan Us Govt Mmkt Fun at about 1.21% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings comprising around 6.01% of total assets under management [5] Performance Metrics - BBMC aims to match the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, having gained about 5.4% year-to-date and approximately 17.63% over the past year as of August 13, 2025 [6] - The ETF has a beta of 1.10 and a standard deviation of 20.05% over the trailing three-year period, indicating effective diversification with around 565 holdings [7] Alternatives in the Market - Other ETFs in the Mid Cap Blend space include the Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) with $86.13 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.04%, and the iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) with $97.30 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.05% [9] Investment Trends - There is a growing trend among retail and institutional investors towards passively managed ETFs due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [10]

Core Viewpoint - The SPDR Gold Trust's holdings remain stable at 964.22 tons of gold as of August 12, 2025, amidst fluctuating gold prices influenced by U.S. inflation data [5]. Group 1: Gold ETF Holdings - As of August 12, 2025, the SPDR Gold Trust holds 964.22 tons of gold, unchanged from the previous trading day [5]. - The report indicates that the gold ETF's total holdings have not experienced any significant changes recently [5]. Group 2: Gold Price Movements - On August 12, 2025, spot gold prices fluctuated within a range of approximately $30, peaking at $3,358.29 per ounce and dipping to $3,330.81 per ounce, closing at $3,348.07 per ounce, reflecting a slight increase of $5.48 or 0.16% [5]. - Following a significant drop in the previous trading day, gold prices stabilized around $3,350 per ounce during Asian and European market hours [5]. Group 3: U.S. Inflation Data Impact - The U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) for July showed a year-over-year increase below expectations, with core CPI rising by 3.1%, marking the highest level since February [5]. - The core CPI's month-over-month increase of 0.3% is the largest since January, leading to increased speculation about a potential interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve in September [5][6]. - Analysts caution that the higher-than-expected core CPI may complicate the Fed's decision-making regarding rate cuts, with further insights expected from the upcoming Jackson Hole symposium [5][6]. Group 4: Market Sentiment and Technical Analysis - Market sentiment is leaning towards a consensus for a September rate cut, but upcoming CPI and non-farm payroll reports will be closely monitored [6]. - Technical analysis indicates a lack of clear direction for gold prices, with the 14-day RSI hovering around 50, suggesting potential downward movement [6]. - If gold prices decline further, short-term targets include the 100-day simple moving average around $3,297, with subsequent support levels at $3,268 and $3,250 [6].

Core Insights - The First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) offers investors exposure to the Style Box - Large Cap Blend category and has amassed over $8.42 billion in assets, making it one of the largest ETFs in this segment [1][5]. Investment Strategy - Smart beta ETFs, like FTCS, are designed to outperform traditional market capitalization weighted indexes by selecting stocks based on specific fundamental characteristics [2][3]. - FTCS tracks the Capital Strength Index, which is an equal-dollar weighted index focusing on well-capitalized companies with strong financial metrics [6]. Cost and Performance - FTCS has an annual operating expense of 0.52% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.21%, which is competitive within its peer group [7]. - The ETF has shown a performance increase of approximately 5.18% year-to-date and 8.12% over the past year, with a trading range between $81.60 and $94.03 in the last 52 weeks [11]. Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF's largest sector allocation is in Industrials at 23.6%, followed by Financials and Consumer Staples [8]. - Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the largest individual holding at 2.54% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings comprising about 22.99% of total assets under management [9]. Risk Profile - FTCS has a beta of 0.79 and a standard deviation of 12.87% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile with effective diversification across 51 holdings [11].

Core Viewpoint - The John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) offers broad exposure to the Small Cap Blend segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $564.78 million since its launch on November 8, 2017 [1] Group 1: Investment Potential - Small cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations below $2 billion, present high potential but also come with increased risk [2] - Blend ETFs typically include a mix of growth and value stocks, providing diversified exposure [2] Group 2: Cost Structure - The annual operating expenses for JHSC are 0.42%, which is competitive with most peer products [3] - The ETF has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.07% [3] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation of approximately 22.8% to the Industrials sector, followed by Financials and Consumer Discretionary [4] - Nextracker Inc Cl A (NXT) constitutes about 0.55% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings making up around 5.11% of total assets under management [5] Group 4: Performance Metrics - JHSC aims to match the performance of the JOHN HANCOCK DIMENSIONAL SMALL CAP INDEX, which includes companies smaller than the 750th largest U.S. company, excluding the smallest 4% [6] - The ETF has experienced a loss of about 0.41% year-to-date and a gain of approximately 6.51% over the past year, with a trading range between $32.47 and $43.65 in the last 52 weeks [7] Group 5: Alternatives - JHSC holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating it is a viable option for investors seeking exposure to the Small Cap Blend market [8] - Other comparable ETFs include the Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) with $63.04 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.05%, and the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) with $80.38 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.06% [9] Group 6: General Insights - Passively managed ETFs like JHSC are increasingly favored by retail and institutional investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [10]

Core Viewpoint - The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is a passively managed fund designed to provide broad exposure to the Large Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, with significant assets under management and low expense ratios [1][4]. Group 1: Fund Overview - QQQM was launched on October 13, 2020, and has accumulated over $56.89 billion in assets, making it one of the largest ETFs in its category [1]. - The fund is sponsored by Invesco and aims to match the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq [7]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Large cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations above $10 billion, are generally more stable and less volatile than mid and small cap companies [2]. - Growth stocks, which QQQM primarily invests in, exhibit faster growth rates and higher valuations compared to the broader market, although they tend to be more volatile [3]. Group 3: Cost Structure - The annual operating expense ratio for QQQM is 0.15%, positioning it as one of the least expensive ETFs in the market [4]. - The ETF has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.53% [4]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Information Technology sector, comprising approximately 53.3% of the portfolio, followed by Telecom and Consumer Discretionary sectors [5]. - Nvidia Corp (NVDA) is the largest holding at about 9.15% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 50.54% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Performance Metrics - As of August 12, 2025, QQQM has increased by about 12.36% year-to-date and 27.91% over the past year, with a trading range between $171.40 and $236.52 in the last 52 weeks [7]. - The ETF has a beta of 1.15 and a standard deviation of 21.74% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a moderate level of risk [8]. Group 6: Competitive Landscape - QQQM holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating strong expected performance based on various factors [9]. - Other comparable ETFs include the Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ), with VUG having $184.51 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.04%, while QQQ has $363.71 billion in assets and charges 0.2% [10]. Group 7: Investment Appeal - Passively managed ETFs like QQQM are favored by both institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency [11].

If you're interested in broad exposure to the Large Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, look no further than the Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) , a passively managed exchange traded fund launched on January 30, 2018.The fund is sponsored by Motley Fool Asset Management. It has amassed assets over $1.59 billion, making it one of the average sized ETFs attempting to match the Large Cap Growth segment of the US equity market.Why Large Cap GrowthCompanies that fall in the large cap category tend to ha ...

Group 1 - The report outlines a grid trading strategy that focuses on capitalizing on price fluctuations rather than predicting market trends, making it suitable for volatile markets [3][13] - Characteristics of suitable grid trading targets include being exchange-traded, having stable long-term trends, low transaction costs, good liquidity, and high volatility, with equity ETFs being particularly appropriate [3][13] - The report highlights specific ETFs for grid trading, including the China Concept Internet ETF, which aims to reduce vicious competition costs and promote technological innovation in the internet sector [4][14] Group 2 - The Hang Seng Technology ETF benefits from improved liquidity in the Hong Kong market and the return of quality listed companies, making it a cost-effective investment tool in a low-interest-rate environment [4][17] - The Software ETF is positioned to leverage opportunities in AI development, with significant policy support encouraging the integration of AI technologies across various sectors [6][20] - The Chip ETF reflects a short-term easing of overseas pressures while emphasizing the long-term trend of domestic substitution in the semiconductor industry, supported by substantial investments in domestic chip manufacturing [7][21]