Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the report indicates that the construction materials and coal industries performed well during the period, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising by 1.67% and the Shenzhen Component Index increasing by 2.33% [2][9] - In the recent 12 periods, the comprehensive and pharmaceutical industries showed strong performance, suggesting potential investment opportunities in these sectors [9] - Active equity funds focusing on electronics and coal industries also demonstrated superior performance during this period [14] Group 2 - Among various fund types, actively managed stock funds increased by 1.55%, while mixed funds rose by 1.63%, and bond funds saw a slight decline of 0.16% [2] - The average return of convertible bond funds was notably high at 12.46% year-to-date, indicating a strong performance in this category [17] - QDII funds, particularly those focused on Asia-Pacific and emerging markets, led the performance with an increase of 2.56% during the period [19][21]

Core Viewpoint - The current market is in a bull phase, with significant losses reported among short sellers in commodity and stock index futures. The article suggests that the most certain investment opportunities in a bull market are either in leading sectors or in severely undervalued stocks [2]. Group 1: Investment Opportunities - The article emphasizes that low-priced stocks tend to be driven up to reasonable levels during a bull market, indicating that underperforming sectors may see substantial gains due to ongoing liquidity and policy support [2]. - The upcoming major meetings are expected to enhance expectations for "stabilizing growth," which may provide considerable policy space for undervalued industries [2]. Group 2: ETF Analysis - The article utilizes the net value percentile calculation method to assess which sectors are currently in a state of severe undervaluation [3]. - A table is provided showing various ETFs, their net value percentiles since 2023 and 2024, and their performance in 2025, highlighting sectors like photovoltaic, alcohol, and real estate [7]. Group 3: Sector-Specific Insights - The photovoltaic sector is identified as particularly undervalued, with ETFs like the photovoltaic ETF (515790.SH) and new energy ETF (516160.SH) showing significant declines. The sector's performance is closely tied to government policies aimed at stabilizing growth [9][10]. - The alcohol sector, particularly the alcohol ETF (512690.SH), is also noted for being in a state of decline, with a lack of clear catalysts for recovery until consumer data improves [20][21]. - The real estate sector shows signs of divergence, with the real estate ETF (159707.SZ) experiencing intermittent policy-driven rallies but ultimately returning to lower levels [25][26]. Group 4: Medical and Pharmaceutical Sector - The medical and pharmaceutical sectors are highlighted as being collectively undervalued, with various ETFs like the biopharmaceutical ETF (159859.SZ) showing potential for recovery due to recent policy shifts regarding procurement practices [33][35]. - The medical ETF (512170.SH) is also mentioned as being in a relatively low valuation position, with a modest performance outlook [39]. Group 5: Commodity and Chemical Sectors - The coal sector has seen a significant price drop but is experiencing a rebound due to rising prices in coking coal and coke futures, with the coal ETF (515220.SH) reflecting this trend [43][45]. - The chemical sector is noted for its broad product range and recent price increases in lithium carbonate, with the chemical ETF (159870.SZ) positioned as relatively undervalued [49][54]. Conclusion - The article concludes that sectors such as chemicals, biopharmaceuticals, medical, alcohol, and photovoltaic are currently in a state of severe undervaluation, presenting potential investment opportunities for discerning investors [56].

上周A股市场在美股、港股震荡上行的基础上延续上涨态势，整体赚钱效应的结构化特征仍然明显。周 内市场日均成交额约18，487亿元，资金方面微观流动性分化。风格上，整体成长优于价值，小盘跑赢 大盘。行业上，建筑材料、煤炭、钢铁等表现靠前，银行、通信、公用事业等表现靠后。 宏观展望："反内卷"行业政策逐步落地，关注需求端持续性 国内方面，整体政策关注度仍集中在"反内卷"政策在各行各业开花的阶段。"反内卷"政策的核心在于： 上游抓价格下游抓质量、减少财政出口退税在内的政府补贴、提高公用事业价格。在政策带动下，上游 制造短暂走强，钢铁高炉开工、原铝出货的同比表现均走强，建筑钢材、玻璃的贸易商采购量也明显增 长，预计会对7月整体工业增加值带来提振作用。 从其他经济分项来看，整体景气依旧有韧性。但近两周需求侧受到台风天气影响，线下消费、基建、出 口强度短暂回落。预计7月出口仍能保持一定增速的正增长，但进入到8月份整体出口压力可能会明显增 强。三季度出口能否继续为宏观经济提供支持，将是市场对宏观经济能否从转冷承压预期转向向上修正 预期的关键。另外，地产成交仍然偏弱，市场成交面积增速下降，一线城市韧性相对较强，二线城市相 对偏 ...

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods 1. Model Name: Broad-based Index Rotation Strategy - **Model Construction Idea**: The strategy is based on the marginal changes in the "heat" (attention) of broad-based indices. By identifying the index with the highest weekly heat change rate, the strategy rotates into that index. If the "Other" group (stocks not included in the four main indices) has the highest heat change rate, the strategy remains in cash[7][13]. - **Model Construction Process**: 1. Calculate the weekly heat change rate for the components of four major indices (CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, CSI 2000) and the "Other" group. 2. Smooth the weekly heat change rate using a 2-week moving average (MA2). 3. At the end of each week, invest in the index with the highest MA2 heat change rate. If the "Other" group has the highest rate, remain in cash[13][16]. - **Model Evaluation**: The strategy demonstrates a clear logic of leveraging market sentiment shifts to generate returns[13]. --- Model Backtesting Results 1. Broad-based Index Rotation Strategy - **Annualized Return**: 8.74% since 2017[16] - **Maximum Drawdown**: 23.5%[16] - **2025 YTD Return**: 20.9%[16] --- Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods 1. Factor Name: Total Heat Indicator - **Factor Construction Idea**: The total heat indicator aggregates the attention metrics (e.g., browsing, watchlist additions, and clicks) of individual stocks. It is normalized as a percentage of the total market and scaled by 10,000. This indicator serves as a proxy for market sentiment[7]. - **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Aggregate the browsing, watchlist, and click counts for each stock. 2. Normalize the aggregated value as a percentage of the total market. 3. Multiply the normalized value by 10,000 to obtain the total heat indicator, with a range of [0, 10,000][7]. - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor effectively captures market sentiment and can be used to identify mispricing due to overreaction or underreaction[7]. 2. Factor Name: Weekly Heat Change Rate (MA2) - **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor measures the weekly change in the total heat indicator, smoothed using a 2-week moving average. It reflects short-term sentiment dynamics[13][20]. - **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Calculate the weekly change rate of the total heat indicator for each stock. 2. Smooth the weekly change rate using a 2-week moving average (MA2)[13][20]. - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor is useful for identifying short-term sentiment-driven opportunities in broad-based indices, industries, and concepts[13][20]. 3. Factor Name: Concept Heat Ranking - **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor ranks concepts based on their weekly heat change rates. It identifies the top and bottom concepts for constructing portfolios[28][31]. - **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Rank concepts by their weekly heat change rates. 2. Select the top 5 concepts with the highest heat change rates. 3. Construct two portfolios: - **TOP Portfolio**: Select the top 10 stocks with the highest total heat within each of the top 5 concepts. - **BOTTOM Portfolio**: Select the bottom 10 stocks with the lowest total heat within each of the top 5 concepts[31]. - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor captures the behavioral tendencies of investors, leveraging the rapid price adjustments in high-attention stocks[28][31]. --- Factor Backtesting Results 1. Total Heat Indicator - **No specific backtesting results provided** 2. Weekly Heat Change Rate (MA2) - **No specific backtesting results provided** 3. Concept Heat Ranking - **BOTTOM Portfolio Annualized Return**: 15.71%[33] - **BOTTOM Portfolio Maximum Drawdown**: 28.89%[33] - **2025 YTD Return for BOTTOM Portfolio**: 29.2%[33]

Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index fell by 0.17% today, with a trading volume of 841.35 million shares and a transaction value of 1,138.73 billion yuan, an increase of 1.39% compared to the previous trading day [1]. Industry Performance - The top-performing sectors included Non-Bank Financials (up 1.11%), Defense and Military (up 1.04%), and Pharmaceutical and Biological (up 0.88%) [1]. - The sectors with the largest declines were Coal (down 2.46%), Steel (down 1.84%), and Beauty and Personal Care (down 1.59%) [2]. Detailed Industry Data - Non-Bank Financials: - Change: +1.11% - Transaction Value: 647.20 billion yuan (up 11.70%) - Leading Stock: Zhongyin Securities (up 6.61%) [1] - Defense and Military: - Change: +1.04% - Transaction Value: 496.34 billion yuan (up 57.68%) - Leading Stock: Xinguang Optoelectronics (up 13.27%) [1] - Pharmaceutical and Biological: - Change: +0.88% - Transaction Value: 986.89 billion yuan (down 13.87%) - Leading Stock: Erkang Pharmaceutical (up 14.89%) [1] - Coal: - Change: -2.46% - Transaction Value: 95.76 billion yuan (down 14.49%) - Leading Stock: Shanxi Coking Coal (down 6.18%) [2] - Steel: - Change: -1.84% - Transaction Value: 129.93 billion yuan (down 18.37%) - Leading Stock: Liugang Co. (down 8.58%) [2] - Beauty and Personal Care: - Change: -1.59% - Transaction Value: 52.80 billion yuan (down 7.19%) - Leading Stock: Baiya Co. (down 7.94%) [2]

Market Overview - The core viewpoint emphasizes that stocks are favored over bonds, with a weak outlook for gold and the US dollar. Investors are advised to focus on changes in equity structure and style, suggesting a strategy of "one body, two wings" [1] - The main focus is on cyclical stocks, which have outperformed technology stocks recently, with the Shanghai Composite Index reaching new highs around the 3600-point mark [1] Cyclical Sector Dynamics - The cyclical sector is driven by policies such as supply contraction and infrastructure projects, indicating a clear revival in this area [2] - The performance of large-cap stocks above 3600 points has created a positive wealth effect, with hopes for a sustained rally in cyclical stocks to surpass previous highs [2] Profitability Insights - In the first half of 2025, the total profit of industrial enterprises above designated size was 34,365 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 1.8%. State-owned enterprises saw a profit drop of 7.6%, while private enterprises experienced a slight increase of 1.7% [2] - Despite a decline in overall industrial profits, certain sectors like manufacturing are showing improvement, with specific industries maintaining good growth [3] Coal Industry Analysis - The coal industry has faced long-term challenges, including competition from renewable energy and overcapacity issues. The cumulative profit for the coal sector in the first half of 2025 was down 53% [4] - The profitability of coal mining is closely linked to market conditions, and while there may be short-term rebounds, the long-term outlook remains uncertain due to fundamental changes in demand and production technology [4] Investment Strategy - The strategy suggests that while cyclical opportunities may be diminishing, localized opportunities exist, particularly in sectors like construction materials due to disaster recovery efforts [6] - Investors are encouraged to adopt a holistic view that integrates cyclical and technological investments, emphasizing the importance of strategic foresight in navigating market fluctuations [6][7]

Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index broke through the 3600-point mark this week, reaching a new high for the year with a weekly increase of 2.21% [2] - Daily average trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets reached 1.82 trillion yuan, an increase of over 290 billion yuan compared to the previous week [2] - Key policy announcements, including the start of major infrastructure projects and the confirmation of Hainan's free trade port closure date, positively impacted market sentiment, particularly in the upstream sectors like construction materials, coal, and steel [2] Bond Market - The bond market experienced a comprehensive adjustment this week, with both government and corporate bonds declining, resulting in negative returns for pure bond funds [3] - The overall funding environment remained balanced, with the central bank providing timely liquidity support through MLF operations, leading to a neutral impact on the bond market [3] Commodity Market - Gold prices fluctuated this week, initially rising due to increased market risk aversion but later declining amid optimistic trade agreement developments [4] - The overall trend for commodities was positive, with the South China Commodity Index rising by 2.73% this week, driven by significant increases in black and energy commodities [39] Overseas Market - Global risk assets generally rose, with the US stock market reaching new highs, supported by positive earnings reports and developments in AI [5] - The S&P 500 index is currently near high valuation levels, indicating a potential decrease in winning odds for US equities in the short term [10] Stock Market Insights - The A-share market continued its upward trend, with the CSI 500 index showing significant weekly gains, reflecting strong investor sentiment and market performance [12] - The market is currently characterized by high trading volumes and turnover rates, particularly in the CSI 300 and CSI 500 indices, which are above their three-year average levels [14] Sector Performance - In the past week, the construction materials, coal, and steel sectors performed exceptionally well, with respective increases of 8.20%, 7.98%, and 7.67% [22] - The overall market sentiment remains optimistic, with a focus on sectors with high earnings certainty and potential for positive surprises [7]

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry Overview - The report discusses the concept of "anti-involution" in the context of China's economic landscape, particularly focusing on the supply-side challenges that are more complex compared to the previous cycle from 2015 to 2018 [2][3]. Core Insights and Arguments 1. **Policy Signals**: There is a notable increase in policy signals regarding "anti-involution," with comparisons made to the supply-side reform 1.0 period. The current challenges differ significantly from those faced between 2015 and 2018 due to changes in industry competition and macroeconomic conditions [2][3]. 2. **Structural Reforms Needed**: To achieve lasting results in anti-involution, there is a consensus on the necessity for deeper structural reforms, including adjustments to local incentive mechanisms and tax reforms aimed at rebalancing towards consumption [3][10]. 3. **Recent Government Actions**: - On July 16, the State Council emphasized a combination of short-term and long-term measures to regulate competition in the new energy vehicle sector. - On July 18, the State Administration for Market Regulation held discussions with major food delivery platforms. - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced supply-side reforms in ten key industries, including non-ferrous metals and petrochemicals [7]. 4. **Market Signals Ignored**: The report highlights that part of the competition's involution is due to ignored market signals, leading to continued capacity expansion despite falling prices [10]. 5. **Historical Context**: The report draws parallels between the current economic situation and past experiences, noting that anti-involution will not be a quick fix. The GDP deflator index has been negative for nine consecutive quarters since Q2 2023, indicating entrenched deflationary pressures [11]. 6. **Capacity Utilization and Industry Dynamics**: The report notes that the current overcapacity is largely in emerging industries, with 50-90% of capacity owned by the private sector, making administrative capacity reduction more challenging compared to the previous cycle [11][19]. 7. **Potential for Mergers and Acquisitions**: There is an expectation for large enterprises in the polysilicon industry to form acquisition funds to consolidate smaller firms, although execution remains uncertain due to declining demand and high inventory levels [12]. 8. **Gradual Progress Expected**: The report suggests that while some upstream industries may see moderate consolidation, the urgency for adjustment is lower compared to previous reforms [17][20]. 9. **Reform Timing and Delays**: The implementation of formal plans for capacity reduction may experience delays of 3-8 months, reflecting the complexities of the current economic environment compared to the 2015-2018 period [20]. Other Important Insights - **Demand Recovery Limitations**: The report indicates that the cyclical growth may fluctuate at lower levels due to debt and demographic challenges, with limited upside for demand recovery without decisive stimulus measures [18]. - **Need for Comprehensive Policy Mix**: The optimal policy combination would involve more aggressive demand rebalancing measures alongside faster structural reforms to achieve sustainable re-inflation [24]. - **Caution Against Overly Aggressive Measures**: The report warns that overly aggressive capacity reduction without sufficient demand support could lead to deeper deflation after a brief improvement in prices [24]. This summary encapsulates the key points discussed in the conference call, providing insights into the current state of the industry and the anticipated direction of policy and economic reforms in China.

展望后市，华宝证券认为，短期来看，周期板块、商品市场存在过热超涨风险，科技（AI、芯片 等）、新能源领域轮动性价比有所回升，后续成长风格有望接力周期。宽基方向创业板、中证500、中 证800、中证1000等中盘方向预计表现更好。 东方证券研报认为，行业和主题领涨结构变化在即。上周领涨行业是建筑材料（8.2%）、煤炭 （8.0%）、钢铁（7.7%）和有色（6.7%），主要系"反内卷"和水电站的主题驱动、商品价格上涨和潜 在政策预期，短期主题行情和商品价格加速上涨阶段或已进入尾声。假设政策符合预期，相关行业供给 侧变化趋势延续，但商品价格仍然难以大幅上涨，相关行业股价上涨斜率会降低，市场需要看到更明确 的需求侧预期。（闻辉） 据招商证券研报统计，上周（7月21日—7月25日）周期ETF涨幅最大，规模以上平均上涨6.41%。国信 证券研报统计，周期ETF净申购最多，为102.31亿元。 "周期行情内部正在向煤炭、建筑等低位行业扩散。"兴业证券研报认为，这种板块轮动与行情扩散的背 后，反映的是市场风险偏好提升后，各类资金正在主线内部积极寻找和挖掘尚未被充分定价的细分领 域。在反内卷涉及的重点行业中，普钢、玻璃玻纤、钛 ...

Group 1 - The A-share market experienced a significant upward trend, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising by 1.67%, the Shenzhen Component Index by 2.33%, and the ChiNext Index by 2.76% last week, driven by liquidity and optimistic trading sentiment [2][5] - The market consensus focused on "low valuation cyclical recovery" and "technology growth industry trends," with strong performances in infrastructure, coal, steel, and semiconductor sectors [3][4] - The financing balance of the two markets has returned to above 1.9 trillion yuan, indicating a continuous inflow of institutional funds and an acceleration of retail investor participation [2][5] Group 2 - The cyclical sector is unlikely to replicate the 2016 supply-side reform rally, as the current "anti-involution" market dynamics suggest limited sustainability in simply betting on upstream price increases [6][7] - Investment strategies should focus on sectors with strong structural elasticity, such as technology and non-bank dividend assets, while maintaining a "barbell" strategy [6][7] - The AI industry chain, humanoid robots, and innovative pharmaceuticals are expected to remain the main investment themes in the medium to long term [7]