Group 1 - The largest shareholder of Jinlitai, Hainan Dahe, is seeking support from all shareholders to remove three directors and elect a new one due to concerns over the company's management and potential delisting risks [1][2][3] - Hainan Dahe has publicly stated that Jinlitai is at high risk of delisting and accused the current board of misappropriating company funds [3][4] - There are ongoing disputes within the company regarding the management's responses to inquiries, with significant disagreements among board members [4][14] Group 2 - Jinlitai's 2024 annual report revealed an audit report with no opinion, indicating internal issues and prompting regulatory scrutiny over potential non-operational fund occupation [7][8] - The company has been accused of transferring funds under the guise of a "strategic reserve," which may involve significant risks of fund misappropriation [10][13] - The audit committee has expressed that the strategic reserve actions do not align with normal procurement practices and should be classified as non-operational fund occupation [15] Group 3 - There are allegations of "false repayments" related to transactions with two entities, raising questions about the legitimacy of the funds' flow [18][20] - The audit committee suspects that repayments from one entity may have returned to the original fund provider, indicating potential financial manipulation [22][24] - Jinlitai's management has denied any wrongdoing, asserting that the transactions were legitimate despite the concerns raised by board members [21][22] Group 4 - The actual control of Jinlitai is under scrutiny, with claims that a mysterious individual, Pei Jian, may be the real controller behind the scenes [25][30] - There are connections between Pei Jian and a trading company accused of fund misappropriation, suggesting a complex web of control and influence [32][41] - Internal sources indicate that Pei Jian has significant influence over the company's operations, despite the official stance that there is no actual controller [41][42]

公司因战略备库行为被质疑非经营性资金占用，且存在与贸易商之间的大额资金往来异常。同时，董事间对公司实际控制人及资金占用问题存在分歧，有 董事指控裴剑为实际控制人并涉嫌勾结管理层侵占公司资金。 裴剑与涉嫌占用资金的贸易商存在隐秘联系，但公司否认其实际控制人身份，未回应相关指控。 提名人选迟迟未能进入董事会，汽车涂料龙头*ST金泰（原证券简称金力泰，以下均称"金力泰"，300225.SZ，股价5.15元，市值24.48亿元）第一大股东海 南大禾企业管理有限公司（以下简称"海南大禾"）决定向上市公司全体股东公开"求援"。 近日，海南大禾公开征集表决权，针对金力泰即将在9月召开的临时股东大会，海南大禾希望全体股东能够帮助其罢免罗甸、于续刚、唐光泽三位董事， 并选举刘小龙为新董事。 在官方微信公众号内，海南大禾直言金力泰退市风险高悬，正站在生死存亡的悬崖边缘，并称现董事会管理层涉嫌挪用甚至侵占公司巨额资金。 金力泰第一大股东海南大禾公开征集表决权，欲罢免三位董事并选举新董事，称公司面临退市风险，董事会管理层涉嫌挪用资金。 当下，理清资金流、分辨实控人，成为各方面关注的焦点。 是"战略备库"还是"占用资金"？ 今年7月发 ...

提名人选迟迟未能进入董事会，*ST金泰（原证券简称金力泰，以下均称"金力泰"，300225.SZ，股价5.15元，市值24.48亿元）第一大股东海南大禾企业管理 有限公司（以下简称"海南大禾"）决定向上市公司全体股东公开"求援"。 近日，海南大禾公开征集表决权，针对金力泰即将在9月召开的临时股东大会，海南大禾希望全体股东能够帮助其罢免罗甸、于续刚、唐光泽三位董事，并 选举刘小龙为新董事。 在官方微信公众号内，海南大禾直言金力泰退市风险高悬，正站在生死存亡的悬崖边缘，并称现董事会管理层涉嫌挪用甚至侵占公司巨额资金。 | 提案编码。 | 提案名称。 | | --- | --- | | | 非累积投票提案。 | | 1.00. | 《关于罢免罗甸第八届董事会非独立董事职务的议案》, | | 2.00 . | 《关于罢免于绪刚第八届董事会独立董事职务的议案》, | | 3.00 | 《关于罢免唐光泽第八届董事会独立董事职务的议案》, | | 4.00 . | 《关于选举刘小龙为第八届董事会非独立董事的议案 同大木企业管理 有 | 图片来源：海南大禾微信公众号 自今年7月年报披露以来，围绕着金力泰的争议不断。随着公司部 ...