从智能农机穿梭田间的富民强村，到生态宜居蓬勃发展的美丽乡村，再到乡风文明治理有效的英才 兴村……今年以来，丹阳界牌镇通过下好"富民强村"棋、"集镇品质"棋、"精建细管"棋，扎实推进农业 农村工作实现从"面子"向"里子"的深度转型。 农村公路既是村民的"出行路""致富路"，也是推动城乡各类要素交换的重要渠道、城乡融合发展的 强力引擎。 下好"富民强村"棋，农民增收挂心间 要实现产业振兴，必须打破"政府建、群众看"的惯性，真正激发市场活力和社会资本的参与，实现 从"输血"到"造血"的转变。 界牌镇始终把粮食生产作为"三农"工作的头等大事，聚焦稳产保供，落实水稻关键生育期精细化管 理。全面筑牢农产品质量安全防线，保持全镇22户5亩以上水产养殖池塘的常态监管，强化8户鲫鱼养殖 主体源头管控。每日对辖区内3处马路市场的水产品销售档口实施巡查，截至目前农产品质量检测总体 合格率及水产品抽检合格率均达100%。 "农业农村工作，增加农民收入是关键。"界牌镇党委书记刘奇说。近年来，界牌镇扎实推进界中第 一工业集中区施工，预计新增税收700万元/年、新增村集体收入300万元/年。深化村组工业集中区改 革，全面推广构建专业团队" ...

"真的既方便又省事。"谈及近期工作中的"小变化"，句容市宝华镇党委政法委员兰锁根感慨良多。 以往这类会议大多是线下召开，镇里负责人得带着一大包材料，坐半个多小时车才能到会场，发言不过 几分钟，又得原样带着材料返回，半天时间就这么过去了。"现在省下来的时间，能让我们多到村（社 区）走一走，踏踏实实帮居民解决实际问题。" 近日，句容市综治中心三楼指挥调度大厅，基层情况通报视频例会准时召开。会议直奔主题：辖区 有无重大矛盾风险、极端天气应对如何、是否存在需要市级层面介入的难题……没有多余寒暄，无需提 前上交材料，短短数分钟便摸清了基层最新动态。 "减下来的负担"已实实在在转化为"提上去的效能"。今年以来，句容市综治中心共收集处置事件3 万余条，办结率100%，处置周期从72小时压缩至6小时。 对基层而言，"最多跑一地"不仅减了负，还提高了办事效率。句容市丁庄村党委书记吴阳的体会尤 为深刻。就在上个月，依托镇里综治中心，村里王春与刘山两家缠了半年的纠纷总算定了案。 王、刘两家原是邻居，之间原本没有院墙。20多年前，刘家靠着自家东面墙建了个小坯间，占的却 是王家的地盘。"这么多年，都是我家不计较，如今他家还想把小坯间拆 ...

Core Points - The "Happiness Home" service complex has become a popular platform for residents to voice their concerns, with a total of 35 issues collected and a 100% resolution rate since its launch in January [1] - The station employs both offline and online channels for feedback, including a "Red and Yellow Card" mechanism to address noise complaints from rental properties [1] - The station conducts weekly sessions to gather public opinions and strengthen communication with the street's disciplinary committee for effective issue resolution [1] Future Plans - The "Happiness Home" service complex plans to enhance its functionality by integrating with the local WeChat public account, allowing real-time tracking of issue resolution and transparency in the process [2] - The upgrade will include a live tracking feature for residents to monitor the progress of their complaints and rate the handling of issues [2]

Core Viewpoint - The "Cadre Lecture Hall" initiative in Gansu's Dangchang County is significantly enhancing the capabilities and work ethic of local officials, driving high-quality development through knowledge sharing and practical engagement [1][2][3]. Group 1: Cadre Training and Development - The "Cadre Lecture Hall" combines education with practical work, focusing on implementing the spirit of the Central Eight Regulations and transforming learning outcomes into actionable efforts [2][3]. - Over 120 grassroots visits and discussions have identified over 1,000 issues, establishing a closed-loop mechanism for problem-solving that has shown initial success [3][11]. - The initiative has led to the organization of over 230 sessions, with more than 9,000 participants, contributing to the development of a high-quality cadre team [13]. Group 2: Community Engagement and Service - Cadres are encouraged to move beyond their offices to actively engage with the community, shifting from a passive to an active service model to address urgent public needs [2][3]. - The implementation of the "1234" work method has facilitated the collection and resolution of 3,575 public requests, achieving a completion rate of over 95% [12]. Group 3: Economic Development and Industry - Dangchang County is promoting diverse industries, including agriculture and tourism, to enhance local economic growth and community welfare [4][8]. - The county has invested 1.81 billion yuan in standardizing and improving 184 rural hospitality businesses, significantly boosting tourism revenue [8]. - The establishment of the "Dangchang Medicinal Herb Cloud Platform" has reduced transaction costs for farmers by over 12 million yuan, supporting the stability of the local medicinal herb industry [7]. Group 4: Infrastructure and Environmental Improvement - Significant investments have been made in rural infrastructure, including the construction of over 43,800 sanitary toilets and 220 kilometers of rural roads, improving living conditions [13]. - The county has implemented comprehensive environmental sanitation measures, enhancing the overall rural landscape and promoting better living habits among residents [13].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the innovative grassroots governance model in Ganyu District, which combines "cadre sinking" and "digital empowerment" to enhance governance effectiveness and improve residents' sense of gain, happiness, and security [1][8]. Digital Empowerment and Service Efficiency - Ganyu District has implemented a digital revolution by introducing electronic seals and a cloud-based system for issuing village-level certificates, significantly reducing the time required for residents to complete administrative tasks [2][3]. - The district has fully utilized 563 electronic seals and established a "smart brain" for village services, providing 24/7 online assistance to residents [2]. Innovative Governance Structures - The district has divided its governance into 68 comprehensive grids and 16 specialized grids, creating a 5G command center that integrates various governance functions [3][4]. - The command center has processed over 22,000 cases since its inception, with 70% of issues resolved locally within the grid [3]. Cadre Engagement and Community Involvement - Approximately 80% of town and street cadres have been deployed to grassroots grids, with a focus on resolving local issues and enhancing community engagement [5][4]. - The district has established a "rotation pool" for administrative personnel and integrated various community resources, achieving a 96.6% satisfaction rate among residents [5]. Community Service Innovations - The establishment of micro-communities has led to improved service delivery, with community centers offering various amenities and activities for residents [6][7]. - The district has successfully matched 114 community service needs with available resources, benefiting over 6,400 households [7]. Future Directions - Ganyu District aims to continue enhancing grassroots governance through ongoing digital empowerment, cadre engagement, and community collaboration, with a focus on meeting residents' needs [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the innovative grassroots governance practices in Baoying County, focusing on the establishment of a governance matrix that enhances community participation and resolves local disputes effectively through various initiatives like "Dadi Tea House" and "Good Deed Savings Book" [1][3][4]. Group 1: Governance Structure - Baoying County has developed a governance matrix that includes "bottom support," "extension of touchpoints," and "activation of momentum" to address issues in grassroots governance [1]. - The county has restructured its grid management into 73 comprehensive grids and 369 micro-grids, allowing for more precise capture of residents' needs and dynamics [2]. - A comprehensive coordination mechanism has been established, linking various community mediation centers and departments to create a collaborative governance environment [2]. Group 2: Community Engagement - The "Dadi Tea House" serves as a platform for informal conflict resolution, where local residents can discuss issues and seek mediation in a relaxed environment [3]. - The "Good Deed Savings Book" incentivizes community participation by quantifying good deeds and allowing residents to exchange points for rewards, thus fostering a culture of mutual assistance [4]. - The integration of these initiatives aims to transform residents from passive observers to active participants in community governance [3][4]. Group 3: Outcomes and Impact - The initiatives have led to increased community engagement, with residents actively participating in environmental cleaning and conflict resolution, resulting in a stronger sense of community [4]. - The village's collective economy has grown, and it has received recognition as a traditional village and a provincial-level characteristic rural demonstration area [4]. - The combination of "precise grid management," "Dadi Tea House," and "Good Deed Savings Book" creates a robust ecosystem for grassroots governance, ensuring clarity in community needs and active participation [4].

Group 1 - The core initiative of "Rural Coordinator" in Jiande City aims to enhance grassroots governance by addressing local issues and improving public services, such as optimizing bus stop locations for better accessibility [1][2] - The implementation of 17 new bus stops in Dazhou Village demonstrates the effectiveness of community engagement and feedback in local governance [1] - The "Rural Coordinator" mechanism has successfully resolved 13 long-standing disputes in the city, showcasing its role as both a mediator and a designer of governance solutions [2] Group 2 - Community participation is encouraged through initiatives like "Praise Action" and "Star Grid Member" selection, leading to a 95% involvement rate in village environmental improvement efforts [3] - The "I Come to Help" service in Xin'anjiang Street has addressed over 500 grassroots livelihood issues through neighborly assistance [3] - The initiative "Everyone is a Cleaner" in Getang Village has resulted in a significant transformation of the village environment and saved over 20,000 yuan in cleaning costs since March [3]

Core Points - The article highlights the implementation of village-level deliberative democracy in Shaanxi Province, emphasizing community engagement in local governance [1][2][3] - It discusses the establishment of a systematic framework for village-level discussions, including topic selection, responsibility delineation, decision-making procedures, and outcome implementation [2][3] - The article showcases various innovative practices and platforms for community engagement, such as "cloud discussions" and "small stool meetings," which facilitate effective communication between residents and local authorities [4][5][8] Group 1: Institutional Framework - Shaanxi Province has issued guidelines to standardize village-level deliberative democracy, making it a foundational aspect of grassroots governance [2][3] - The province has developed a comprehensive mechanism for topic selection, participant responsibility, decision-making processes, and outcome follow-up [2][3] - A "1+5+X" mechanism has been established to ensure broad participation in discussions, involving village party organizations and various community representatives [3] Group 2: Community Engagement Practices - Various forms of community engagement have been implemented, including online platforms and in-person meetings, to gather public opinions and address local issues [3][4] - The "small stool meeting" concept has been popularized, allowing community leaders to gather feedback and resolve conflicts effectively [4][5] - Innovative brands of deliberation have emerged across different regions, such as "Luyuanliangyi" and "Hometown Discussion Day," enhancing community participation in governance [4][5] Group 3: Training and Capacity Building - Training programs for village party organization leaders have been initiated to ensure effective facilitation of deliberative processes [7] - The province has selected demonstration counties to promote comprehensive implementation of deliberative democracy, aiming for widespread adoption [7] - The integration of technology and local governance practices is being emphasized to enhance the effectiveness of community engagement [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - The successful mediation case highlights the effective integration of social governance and conflict resolution in Han City, showcasing the city's commitment to improving community services and legal support [3][4]. Group 1: Mediation Process - Zhang Qingchao expressed satisfaction with the mediation process, noting the professionalism and attentiveness of the mediator [1]. - The mediation involved a detailed examination of the case facts and an understanding of both parties' needs, leading to a consensus [2]. Group 2: Social Governance Integration - The case exemplifies Han City's approach to integrating "execution linkage + social governance," promoting multi-faceted conflict resolution and enhancing social governance efficiency [3]. - The city has established mechanisms for early detection and intervention in conflicts, ensuring timely resolution [3][4]. Group 3: Center Operations and Achievements - The Han City Comprehensive Governance Center has adopted a "one-stop" model for conflict resolution, integrating various services such as legal consultation and dispute mediation [3]. - In 2024, the center handled over 600 public requests, with a mediation success rate exceeding 95% [3]. - The city has implemented a structured framework for the governance centers, achieving a conflict resolution rate of over 97% for 181 cases this year [4]. Group 4: Future Plans - The Han City Comprehensive Governance Center plans to innovate work models to ensure a closed-loop management system for addressing public concerns [5].