Workflow
《人民的名义》
icon
Search documents
AI魔改经典老剧 切莫触碰侵权雷区
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-09-18 22:30
Core Viewpoint - The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has led to a surge in AI-generated content (AIGC), which raises concerns about the boundaries of "fair use" and copyright infringement, particularly in the context of classic films and television shows [1][2]. Group 1: AI Technology and Content Creation - AI technology has enabled diverse forms of artistic reconstruction, including film remakes, AI singer covers, and style imitation in painting, expanding creative boundaries [1]. - The use of AI for modifying classic works can lead to a distortion of the original creators' intentions and the essence of the original works, potentially disrespecting cultural heritage [1][2]. Group 2: Copyright and Legal Implications - Classic works are still under copyright, and unauthorized modifications using AI may infringe on the original creators' rights [2]. - The creation of parody or altered videos using original characters and actors' likenesses can violate portrait rights, leading to legal repercussions [2]. Group 3: Responsibilities of Creators and Platforms - Creators and platforms must respect the rights of original creators and seek proper authorization for any AI-based adaptations to ensure compliance with copyright laws [2][3]. - There is a need for creators to maintain the integrity of the original works and avoid excessive reinterpretation that could harm the original's reputation and the portrayal of its characters [2][3]. Group 4: Accountability for Infringement - If copyright infringement occurs, video publishers may face liability, and platforms that fail to fulfill their review obligations could also be held accountable for the consequences of such infringements [3].
广电 21 条重塑长剧市场:在松绑与竞争中寻找新坐标
Jing Ji Guan Cha Bao· 2025-08-20 15:03
Core Viewpoint - The "Broadcasting 21 Measures" introduced by the National Radio and Television Administration aims to revitalize the long drama market by lifting restrictions and fostering competition, addressing the significant decline in television drama production from 429 in 2014 to 115 in 2024 [2][8]. Policy Changes and Market Impact - The cancellation of the 40-episode limit is a significant change, allowing creators to maintain narrative integrity and explore complex storylines, as evidenced by the higher user retention rates of seasonal dramas compared to traditional series [3][4]. - The new policy allows for flexible adjustments in the airing of historical dramas based on audience demographics, reducing investment risks for producers and promoting high-quality historical content [3][4]. - The introduction of a "simultaneous review" mechanism is expected to shorten the average review cycle by over 40%, enabling quicker adaptations to audience feedback and reducing costs associated with post-production modifications [4]. Commercialization and Advertising - The reintroduction of mid-episode advertisements is reshaping the profitability of dramas, allowing for creative integration of ads and helping broadcasters offset rising acquisition costs [5]. - The "one drama, multiple stars" policy facilitates collaborative purchasing among broadcasters, reducing costs and increasing the reach of quality dramas to wider audiences [5]. Competitive Landscape and Challenges - The allowance for micro-short dramas to air on television introduces new competition, compelling long drama creators to enhance content quality and engagement to retain viewer interest [6]. - The relaxation of restrictions on importing foreign programs pushes domestic productions to elevate their standards, with leading companies adjusting their production quality to compete globally [7]. Content Creation Philosophy - The "Broadcasting 21 Measures" signifies a shift in the relationship between government and market forces in content production, emphasizing the importance of artistic integrity and audience engagement in the face of technological advancements [8].