Core Viewpoint - A third-party testing agency has reported the presence of Sudan Red, a banned substance for 20 years, in multiple skincare products, raising concerns about product safety and regulatory compliance [1][5]. Group 1: Testing Results - The testing revealed that several skincare products contained Sudan Red IV, with concentrations ranging from 435 to 1982 µg/kg [1]. - The source of Sudan Red in these products is linked to ingredients such as "eel extract, neem leaf extract, and moringa seed oil," which are supplied by a company based in Singapore [5][7]. Group 2: Regulatory Context - Sudan Red IV is classified as a prohibited ingredient in cosmetics according to the "Cosmetic Prohibited Ingredients Directory" [3][5]. - The chemical is an artificial azo dye, primarily used for coloring in industrial applications, and is not permitted in food or cosmetic products in China [5][3]. Group 3: Industry Response - Several brands have responded by either conducting product tests or removing affected products from sale. For instance, "Hua Xizi" has taken its product offline while others like "Farmacy" and "Chillmore" are investigating supplier compliance [8][9]. - The involved supplier, Campo Research (S) Pte. Ltd, specializes in natural plant-based cosmetic ingredients and has a global distribution network [7][6].

Core Viewpoint - The beauty industry is facing a safety crisis due to the detection of the banned substance Sudan Red in various cosmetic products, raising public concern [1] Group 1: Detection of Banned Substance - A third-party testing agency, "Old Dad Testing," reported finding Sudan Red, a chemical dye banned globally since 2003, in multiple cosmetic products [1] - Sudan Red is classified as having genotoxic and potential carcinogenic risks, and it has been listed as a prohibited ingredient in cosmetics by the National Medical Products Administration since 2021 [1] Group 2: Brand Responses - Several brands, including Huaxizi, Tingyan, and Qiyou, have removed the questioned products from their online stores following the allegations [2] - Specific products such as Huaxizi's Peach Fresh Essence Cream and Tingyan's Collagen Essence have been taken down from their official flagship stores [2][8] - Qiyou's Squalane Fragrance Essence is still available but claims that the current stock is a new version, with the problematic batches sent for testing [2] Group 3: Source of Contamination - The source of the banned substance was traced back to a red ingredient containing extracts from Eclipta Prostrata, Melia Azadirachta, and Moringa Oleifera, with a Sudan Red concentration of 1170 ppm [3][4] - The supplier of this ingredient is identified as Campo Research (S) Pte. Ltd, a Singapore-based company specializing in natural plant-based cosmetic ingredients [4][6] Group 4: Industry Implications - The presence of Sudan Red in "natural" ingredients raises questions about the integrity of suppliers, as it was allegedly added to enhance color stability [6][7] - "Old Dad Testing" suggests that the addition of Sudan Red was a deliberate act by the supplier, leaving brands unaware of the contamination [7] Group 5: Ongoing Investigations - Brands are conducting urgent self-checks and sending products for third-party testing to confirm the presence of Sudan Red [11][13] - Some brands, like Kiehl's, have clarified that their current products do not contain the implicated ingredients and comply with national regulations [13]

Core Viewpoint - The beauty industry is facing a safety crisis due to the detection of the banned substance Sudan Red in multiple cosmetic products, raising public concern [1][5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A third-party testing agency, "Old Dad Testing," reported finding Sudan Red, a chemical dye banned globally since 2003, in various cosmetics [1][5]. - Sudan Red is known for its genotoxicity and potential carcinogenic risks, and it has been listed as a prohibited ingredient in cosmetics by the National Medical Products Administration since 2021 [1][5]. - Several brands, including Huaxizi, Tingyan, and Qiyou, have responded by removing the affected products from their shelves [1][9]. Group 2: Testing and Findings - "Old Dad Testing" discovered that the source of Sudan Red was a red ingredient containing extracts from Eclipta Prostrata, Melia Azadirachta, and Moringa Oleifera, with a Sudan Red content of 1170 ppm [5][7]. - The testing agency conducted public sampling tests on multiple skincare products using the same ingredient, all of which tested positive for Sudan Red [9][10]. - The affected red ingredient was traced back to a Singapore-based supplier, Campo Research (S) Pte. Ltd, which specializes in natural plant-based cosmetic ingredients [5][7]. Group 3: Brand Responses - Brands implicated in the scandal, such as Huaxizi and Tingyan, have initiated product recalls and investigations into their suppliers [9][13]. - Huaxizi's customer service confirmed that they are conducting a strict investigation into the relevant raw material suppliers and have suspended sales of the affected products [9][13]. - Other brands, including Qiyou and Farmacy, are also conducting tests on their products, but some have been less forthcoming about whether their current products contain the problematic ingredients [15][16].

Core Viewpoint - The beauty industry is facing a safety crisis due to the detection of the banned substance Sudan Red in various cosmetic products, raising public concern [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A third-party testing agency, "Old Dad Testing," reported finding Sudan Red in multiple cosmetic products, which has been banned globally since 2003 due to its genotoxic and potential carcinogenic risks [1][2]. - The National Medical Products Administration of China has included Sudan Red I-IV in its list of banned substances for cosmetics since 2021 [1]. Group 2: Brand Responses - Several brands, including Huaxizi, Tingyan, and Qiyou, have removed the questioned products from their official stores [2][8]. - Huaxizi's Peach Fresh Essence Cream and Tingyan's Collagen Essence have been taken down, while Qiyou's Squalane Fragrance Essence is still available but claimed to be a new version [2][9]. - Brands are conducting investigations and sending products for testing to ensure compliance with safety standards [8][9]. Group 3: Source of Contamination - The source of Sudan Red was traced back to a red ingredient containing extracts from Eclipta Prostrata, Melia Azadirachta, and Moringa Oleifera, with a detected concentration of 1170 ppm [3][4]. - The supplier of this ingredient, Campo Research (S) Pte. Ltd., based in Singapore, has distributors in China [4][5]. Group 4: Industry Implications - The incident highlights the potential for raw material suppliers to intentionally add banned substances under the guise of natural ingredients for coloring purposes [5][6]. - The testing results indicated that multiple products contained Sudan Red IV, with concentrations ranging from 435 to 1982 µg/kg [8].

Core Insights - The controversial product "Peach Blossom Fresh Essence Foundation Cream" by Huaxizi has been removed from the brand's official flagship store following reports of Sudan Red contamination in multiple cosmetic brands [1] Company Overview - Huaxizi's associated company, Hangzhou Huaningxiang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., was established in May 2017 with a registered capital of 5 million RMB, fully owned by Zhejiang Yige Beauty Group Co., Ltd. [1] - Zhejiang Yige Beauty Group Co., Ltd. was founded in November 2021 with a registered capital of approximately 51.546 million RMB, fully owned by Yige International Investment Development (Hainan) Co., Ltd. [1] Legal Issues - Hangzhou Yige Cosmetics Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Zhejiang Yige Beauty Group, is involved in multiple legal disputes, including trademark infringement, online infringement, commercial defamation, and reputation rights disputes [1] - In January of this year, Hangzhou Jiangze E-commerce Co., Ltd. was fined 30,000 RMB by the market supervision administration for inaccurate claims regarding the performance and ingredient descriptions of three cosmetic products advertised in its online store [1]

Core Viewpoint - A third-party evaluation agency detected the banned substance Sudan Red in a skin care product, which was not listed in the ingredient label, indicating potential human addition [1] Group 1: Product Findings - The product tested contained Sudan Red at a concentration of 1170 ppm, significantly exceeding the pollution threshold [1] - Multiple skin care products using the same red composite plant ingredient were tested, all showing the presence of Sudan Red [1] - One specific product, Huaxizi Peach Fresh Essence Base Cream, was identified to contain Sudan Red [1] Group 2: Company Response - The Huaxizi product has been removed from the brand's official flagship store following the findings [1] - Customer service representatives stated that a strict investigation into the related raw material suppliers is underway [1] - The sale of the related products has been suspended to protect consumer rights, with no notification for re-listing provided yet [1]

Core Viewpoint - The brand Huaxizi has removed its "Peach Jiao Fresh Face Essence Cream" from its official flagship store due to concerns over the presence of Sudan Red in multiple cosmetic products [1] Group 1: Product Recall and Consumer Safety - Huaxizi's flagship store has taken down the "Peach Jiao Fresh Face Essence Cream" following reports of Sudan Red contamination [1] - The customer service of Huaxizi stated that they are taking consumer feedback seriously and have initiated a strict investigation into the raw material suppliers [1] - The product will remain unavailable for sale during the investigation to protect consumer rights [1] Group 2: Industry Impact and Brand Involvement - A third-party evaluation agency, "Old Dad Evaluation," reported that several cosmetic brands, including Huaxizi, Kiehl's, and others, are implicated in the Sudan Red controversy [1] - The suspected source of Sudan Red is linked to a composite raw material group containing Eclipta Prostrata extract, Melia Azadirachta leaf extract, and Moringa Oleifera seed oil [1] - Other brands such as Yuru Chuq, Qie Chuq, and Chillmore are also involved in the Sudan Red issue, with some claiming they have arranged for testing [1]

Core Insights - The product "Peach and Tender Fresh Essence Foundation Cream" by Huaxizi has been removed from the brand's official flagship store due to concerns over the presence of Sudan Red in its ingredients [1] - A third-party evaluation agency, "Old Dad Evaluation," reported that multiple cosmetic brands, including Huaxizi, were found to contain Sudan Red, which is suspected to originate from a composite raw material group [1] - The brands involved in the Sudan Red controversy include Kiehl's, Huaxizi, Yurun Chu, Tingyan, Qiechu, and Chillmore [1] Company Actions - Huaxizi's flagship store customer service stated that the company is taking consumer feedback seriously and has initiated a strict investigation into the relevant raw material suppliers [1] - During the investigation period, the company has suspended the sale of the related products to protect consumer rights [1]

Core Viewpoint - A recent report by a third-party evaluation agency revealed the presence of the banned chemical Sudan Red in several popular skincare products, raising concerns about consumer safety and regulatory compliance [1] Group 1: Product Safety Concerns - The testing identified Sudan Red, a chemical dye with genotoxic and potential carcinogenic risks, in a skin care product, suggesting contamination from a red ingredient in the formulation [1] - Multiple domestic and international beauty brands, including Kiehl's, Farmacy, and others, have been implicated in this issue, with specific products listed that may contain Sudan Red [1] Group 2: Brand Responses - Brands such as Flower West and Kiehl's have stated that their products comply with national regulations and have undergone testing by recognized authorities [1] - Kiehl's customer service indicated that their products meet relevant legal standards, while Flower West's customer service mentioned that they have notified authorities for investigation [1] Group 3: Industry Implications - The incident highlights potential vulnerabilities in the supply chain, where brands may unknowingly use raw materials containing banned substances due to deception by suppliers [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a significant safety issue in the skincare industry, where several brands, including Kiehl's and Huaxizi, have been found to contain the banned substance Sudan Red, raising concerns about product safety and brand risk management [2][11][17]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A third-party testing agency discovered Sudan Red, a banned substance, in a skincare product, with a concentration of 1170 ppm, indicating intentional addition [2][3]. - Multiple skincare products using the same red composite plant ingredient were tested, and all were found to contain Sudan Red [6][11]. - The brands implicated include Kiehl's, Huaxizi, and Farmacy, among others, with consumers expressing concern over the safety of these products [6][11][17]. Group 2: Brand Responses - Kiehl's customer service stated that their products comply with national regulations and may originate from various countries, including the US and France [2][6]. - Huaxizi's customer service claimed that their products have passed inspections by recognized authorities and are registered with the National Medical Products Administration [11][15]. - Both brands emphasized their commitment to product safety, despite the ongoing concerns raised by the testing results [11][15]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The incident underscores the need for brands to enhance their risk assessment capabilities and ingredient sourcing practices to prevent similar occurrences in the future [3][15]. - The article points out that the use of Sudan Red has a history of causing safety crises in various sectors, including food and cosmetics, indicating a broader issue within the industry [11][17]. - The testing agency suggests that many brands may have been misled by suppliers, highlighting the importance of thorough ingredient verification [3][13].