便荔卡包
Search documents
藏在商城的助贷生意:量化派羊小咩等高溢价嵌套分期,打折回收有猫腻
Xin Jing Bao· 2026-01-08 02:36
"助贷新规"正式落地后,助贷平台纷纷开启转型,商城模式成为热门方向之一。 助贷业务藏身商城? 量化派旗下羊小咩商城嵌套分期平台被投诉"利息高" "如果没有分期功能和套现功能,我应该不会用。"消费者李先生使用羊小咩商城是因为他曾接到推销电话,称该 平台购物可以分期。而刘女士则是在羊小咩"变身"前就开始使用,亦是因其"可分期、可套现"而沿用至今。 截至2026年1月4日,新京报贝壳财经记者在投诉平台上检索发现,共有超过3万条投诉包含"羊小咩"。其中,利息 高、收费不合理、商品差价大等成了不少用户共同投诉的问题。 公开资料显示,羊小咩的前身是助贷平台"信用钱包",但2025年9月份,羊小咩商城的运营方量化派控股有限公司 (以下简称"量化派")曾在招股说明书中指出,量化派已停止向金融机构提供撮合服务(或贷款便利化及流量分 流服务),并向中国内地相关金融监管机构承诺日后不会再开展该等业务。 为何羊小咩商城被投诉有助贷?多位投诉者告诉新京报贝壳财经记者,他们是通过"便荔卡包"获得的分期额度。 记者在"便荔卡包"App上看到,其首页即可申请分期额度。下方的"商城"在点击后即跳转至羊小咩商城。 近日,新京报贝壳财经记者收到了 ...
上市公司量化派放弃助贷做商城,万条用户投诉揭示商品分期真相
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-12-10 06:48
量化派曾向中国内地相关金融监管机构承诺,日后不会再开展已停止向金融机构提供撮合服务(或贷款便利化及流量分流服务)等业务,而合作渠道"便荔 卡包" 经营主体和APP运营关联方主体均属于该公司旗下。 2025年11年27日,量化派经过6次上市申请(1次美国、5次香港),在第六次成功"鸡肋募资"上市了。 募资1.31亿元,扣除上亿元的上市费用后,募资净额约千万元左右,且绝大部分融资都将用于支付IPO费用。 | 序号 | 申请时间 | 量化派的上市阶段 | 申请结果 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 2017年8月 | 首次以保密形式向美国 SEC 提交 IPO 申请 | 因监管与市场环境撤回 | | 2 | 2022年6月 | 首次向港交所主板递表 | 6个月内未聆讯,招股书失效 | | 3 | 2023年2月 | 第二次向港交所递表 | 未通过聆讯,招股书失效 | | 4 | 2024年5月 | 第三次向港交所递表 | 未通过聆讯,招股书失效 | | 5 | 2024年12月31 日 | 第四次向港交所递交招股书 | 未通过聆讯,招股书失效 | | 6 | 2025年3月28日 ...
毛利率超茅台,量化派为何不惜代价上市?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-12-06 03:17
Core Viewpoint - Quantitative Technology Co., Ltd. has successfully listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, marking a significant transformation from its previous lending business to a focus on e-commerce and consumer services [2][7]. Group 1: Business Transformation - The company has completely terminated its lending business, shifting its focus to "commodity trading empowerment" [2]. - The new business model is centered around the "Yang Xiaomei" platform, which has achieved a gross profit margin of 97.1% in the first five months of 2025, significantly higher than major e-commerce players like Alibaba and JD.com [2][8]. - The revenue from the Yang Xiaomei platform accounted for 93.2% of the company's total revenue in 2024, increasing to 98.1% in the first five months of 2025 [8]. Group 2: Historical Context - Founded in 2014 as "Quantum Data Science," the company initially focused on a cash loan platform called "Credit Wallet," leveraging big data and AI for loan matching [3][5]. - The company faced regulatory challenges in 2017, leading to a suspension of its IPO application in the U.S. and a subsequent restructuring [5][7]. Group 3: Financial Insights - The company raised approximately HKD 131 million in its IPO, but after expenses, the net amount was only about HKD 12.37 million, with listing costs accounting for 90.56% of the total raised [11][12]. - The company has a significant financial obligation related to preferred shares, amounting to approximately RMB 1.839 billion (around HKD 2 billion), which could be converted to common shares upon successful listing [12][13]. Group 4: Market Position and User Behavior - Despite higher prices on the Yang Xiaomei platform, the company maintains a monthly active user base of 937,000 and an average consumer spending of RMB 25,600 [9]. - The platform has been linked to consumer finance platforms, allowing users to utilize shopping credits for purchases, indicating a complex relationship between e-commerce and financial services [10][11].
量化派上市募资千万港元,数万条投诉涉当家产品“羊小咩”合规性
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-12-02 11:14
Core Viewpoint - Quantitative Party (2685.HK) has listed in Hong Kong, raising approximately HKD 131 million, with a net amount of HKD 12.37 million from the offering [1] Group 1: Company Background - Quantitative Party, known as Quantum Data Technology Co., Ltd. in China, was founded in 2014 in Beijing by Zhou Hao, who initially focused on online lending and created the cash loan platform "Credit Wallet" [1] - The company rebranded "Credit Wallet" to "Yang Xiaomiao" in 2020, claiming a shift from main lending operations to a consumer e-commerce platform, although it appears to still operate within the financial sector [3] Group 2: Business Operations - The Yang Xiaomiao app, while positioned as an e-commerce platform, offers products at significantly higher prices compared to competitors like JD.com, with a specific example showing a price of CNY 13,321 for an iPhone 17 Pro Max, compared to CNY 9,999 on JD.com [3][5] - Complaints on the Black Cat Complaints platform exceed 24,000, primarily concerning misleading shopping practices, inflated product prices, high interest on installment purchases, and aggressive debt collection practices linked to the associated platform "Bian Li Card Package" [5] Group 3: Regulatory Issues - The operator of Yang Xiaomiao, Beijing Yudong Intelligent Information Technology Co., Ltd., is fully owned by Quantum Data Technology Co., Ltd., while the operator of "Bian Li Card Package" is Beijing Zimu Yunchuang Technology Co., Ltd., also fully owned by a related entity [5] - In July, a related entity, Yingtan Xinjing Guangda Microfinance Co., Ltd., was fined CNY 196,000 by the People's Bank of China for violations related to credit information management, and it is a major client of Quantitative Party [7]
量化派IPO募资580万:1.17亿上市费背后对赌压顶,助贷转型“数字消费”投诉超3万条
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-23 23:41
Core Viewpoint - The company, Quantitative Finance, is set to launch its IPO on November 27, after a lengthy journey marked by failures and multiple attempts to list on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. However, the IPO is characterized by significant controversy due to its low net fundraising amount compared to high listing costs, reflecting underlying financial and compliance issues [2][3][4]. Fundraising and Financials - Quantitative Finance plans to issue approximately 13.35 million shares, aiming to raise around 124 million HKD, but will incur listing expenses of 117 million HKD, resulting in a net fundraising amount of only 5.8 million HKD [3][4]. - The net amount raised is insufficient to cover the company's operational costs, as its R&D expenses for the first five months of the year reached 19.44 million HKD, indicating a severe cash flow shortfall [3][4]. - The net fundraising amount is even less than the maximum subscription amount for individual investors, highlighting a lack of confidence in the company's fundamentals [3][4]. Debt and Redemption Pressure - The IPO is driven not by business expansion needs but by the pressure of unresolved redemption obligations from prior financing, which included approximately 1.4 billion HKD in preferred stock with strict redemption clauses [4][5]. - As of October last year, the value of these financial instruments had risen to 1.686 billion HKD, with a requirement for redemption at a compounded annual rate of 10% or 120% of the original investment plus unpaid dividends [5]. - The company's liquidity crisis could be triggered if the IPO fails, as the potential debt could overwhelm its limited cash reserves [5]. Market Confidence and Investor Participation - The absence of cornerstone investors in the IPO indicates a lack of long-term institutional support and confidence in the company's prospects [5][6]. - The proportion of shares being issued is only 2.6% of the total post-IPO share capital, significantly below the typical 10% requirement for free float on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, which could lead to stock price volatility post-listing [5][6]. Business Transformation and Compliance Issues - Quantitative Finance's transition from a credit wallet platform to a digital consumption service reflects broader challenges faced by fintech companies in China amid tightening regulations [6][7]. - Despite claims of moving away from financial services, the company still exhibits signs of its previous business model, with a high gross margin of 96.86%, suggesting a reliance on platform service fees rather than product sales [7][8]. - Complaints against the company's platform remain high, indicating ongoing issues related to pricing, consumer inducement, and aggressive collection practices, which may undermine its claims of having moved past its previous lending model [7][8]. Conclusion - While the IPO may temporarily alleviate the company's debt risks, the low net fundraising amount does not address its operational cash flow challenges, and the lack of business growth support raises concerns about the sustainability of its future operations [8].
量化派五闯港股IPO:屡败屡战,这次转型能翻盘?
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-09-28 06:34
Core Viewpoint - Quantitative Holdings Limited has submitted its IPO application for the fifth time, following four previous failed attempts since 2022, raising questions about whether this time it can succeed [1]. Group 1: Business Transformation - The company originated in the Chinese fintech sector, initially focusing on its core product "Credit Wallet," which recommended users to financial institutions. However, due to increasing regulatory pressures, the company was forced to pivot its business model [2]. - In November 2020, "Credit Wallet" was upgraded to "Yang Xiaomiao," a consumer-oriented digital trading platform covering various categories such as consumer electronics and food [2]. - As of September 12, 2024, the company has completely terminated its lending business and has committed to regulators not to re-enter this space [2]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Revenue figures from 2022 to 2024 show a growth trajectory: 475 million yuan in 2022, 530 million yuan in 2023, and 993 million yuan in 2024, with 414 million yuan reported in the first five months of 2025, marking a 38.12% year-on-year increase [5]. - The "Yang Xiaomiao" platform has become the main revenue driver, contributing 93.2% of total revenue in 2024, up from 37.8% in 2023 [5]. - The company reported a turnaround from a loss of 283,000 yuan in 2022 to a profit of 1.47 billion yuan in 2024, with a significant increase in gross margin from 69.4% in 2023 to 96.9% in 2024 [5]. Group 3: Operational Challenges - The company faces significant operational issues, with over 30,000 complaints reported on the Black Cat Complaints platform, primarily concerning inflated prices and inducements for cashing out [6]. - Products on the "Yang Xiaomiao" platform are priced significantly higher than mainstream channels, with a Xiaomi 15 Pro listed at 5,869 yuan compared to 4,799 yuan on JD.com, indicating a markup of over 22% [8]. - There are allegations of a gray market cash-out scheme, where consumers report receiving calls to buy back products at prices below market value after purchasing through the platform [8].
五次冲击上市 量化派陷入高负债与合规危机
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-04-27 11:51
Core Viewpoint - Quantitative Finance has made its fifth attempt to enter the capital market, facing multiple failures due to regulatory compliance issues and heavy reliance on its lending business, which remains unresolved [3][4][5]. Group 1: IPO Attempts and Regulatory Challenges - The company plans to issue up to 15,097,500 shares for its IPO on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with proceeds aimed at enhancing R&D capabilities and improving technical infrastructure [2]. - Previous attempts to go public include a failed 2017 application for the U.S. market and four submissions to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange from June 2022 to December 2024, primarily due to issues like hearing failures and compliance doubts [3][4]. - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has requested additional materials regarding business compliance, user complaints, and equity-related issues during the listing process [3][4]. Group 2: Business Model and Compliance Issues - The company transitioned from a cash loan platform to a comprehensive consumer service platform, "Yang Xiaomei," in response to regulatory changes, but the new business has not gained significant market traction, holding only a 0.7% market share in 2023 [4][5]. - The lending business, which includes products like "Enjoy Card" and "Backup Fund," is a major revenue source, but its compliance has been questioned, with the CSRC indicating potential violations of financial regulations [5][8]. - Revenue from the financial institution's precise matching solutions has fluctuated significantly, with a drop from 76.8% in 2021 to 8.3% in the first half of 2024 [6][8]. Group 3: Financial Health and Future Outlook - As of June 2024, the company reported a net asset deficit of 1.025 billion yuan and a debt-to-asset ratio of 222.51%, indicating severe financial distress [14]. - The company faces a redemption obligation of 1.6 billion yuan in preferred shares while having only 335 million yuan in cash, leading to a critical cash flow situation [14][15]. - Concerns about financial risks are heightened due to reliance on the lending business, cash flow issues, and increasing accounts receivable, which rose from 151 million yuan in 2021 to 443 million yuan in 2023 [14][15].