被大家诟病最多的汽车技术创新，大概要数隐藏式门把手了。出门打车遇到这种车，给我的第一印象就 很不好，要是司机一时忘记按下开门键，你只能在外面干着急，要是恰逢下雨天，还得在外面多淋一会 儿雨，这又何必呢？ 据车企说，隐藏式门把手可以减少风阻、降低油耗，经济又环保。一部经常低速行驶的家用车而已，又 不是参加F1方程式比赛，门把手降低的那点风阻，能补偿其给用户带来的麻烦吗？且不说发生事故之 后，隐藏式门把手可能因为从外面打不开，从而丧失宝贵的救援机会，单单在北方地区使用就非常麻 烦，冬季天气寒冷，要是隐藏式门把手被冻住了，司机想上车都得费半天劲！ 据悉，《汽车车门把手安全技术要求》强制性国家标准，正公开征求社会各界意见。 其中一点，令人眼前一亮：征求意见稿提到，每个车门（不包括尾门）应配置具备机械释放功能的车门 外把手。这是什么意思呢，说白了就是必须配备传统式的手拉门把手，不能仅用电打开。 类似的奇葩设计还有不少。譬如，全景天幕把汽车变成"桑拿房"，全触屏让实体键3秒钟可搞定的事非 得花上几十秒，半幅方向盘让车主"找罪受"，电子外后视镜好看不实用……当中，有些奇葩设计只是给 司机增加一点麻烦，那还是小事，习惯就好了 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the discomfort and practical issues faced by electric vehicle (EV) owners due to innovative designs that prioritize aesthetics and technology over user comfort and safety, particularly in extreme weather conditions [1][3][54]. Group 1: Issues with Panoramic Glass Roofs - The panoramic glass roofs, initially marketed for their spaciousness and aesthetic appeal, have become a source of discomfort, turning vehicles into "sauna rooms" during summer [4][5]. - Many EV models, including those from brands like Zhiji, Zeekr, and NIO, feature panoramic roofs, but owners report excessive heat and discomfort, leading to potential interior damage [9][11]. - The automotive industry’s focus on design has overshadowed the need for comfort, as the technology for heat insulation has not fully addressed the issue of heat retention in extreme temperatures [11][57]. Group 2: Hidden Door Handles - Hidden door handles, while designed to reduce drag and enhance aesthetics, have received significant criticism, with 69% of consumers expressing concerns about their usability and reliability [13][15]. - Issues such as freezing in winter and mechanical failures have led to frustrating experiences for users, including incidents where door handles failed to operate during emergencies [19][20]. - The repair costs for hidden door handles are significantly higher than traditional handles, leading to dissatisfaction among consumers [20]. Group 3: Full Touchscreens - The shift to full touchscreen controls has complicated user interactions, with many drivers finding it less efficient than traditional buttons, particularly for essential functions like air conditioning [22][24]. - Complaints about infotainment systems being overly complex and slow to respond have increased, with drivers reporting delays in critical situations [26][28]. - The reliance on touchscreens can also pose safety risks, as it distracts drivers from the road [28]. Group 4: Half-Width Steering Wheels - The introduction of half-width steering wheels has created operational challenges for drivers, making standard maneuvers more difficult and increasing the risk of losing grip [29][31]. - New drivers have reported difficulties adapting to this design, leading to potential safety hazards during driving [35][39]. Group 5: Electronic Side Mirrors - Electronic side mirrors, while visually appealing, have been criticized for their delayed response times and performance issues in adverse weather conditions [41][43]. - Users have reported that these mirrors can become obscured in rain or snow, compromising visibility and safety [43][46]. Group 6: Single-Pedal Driving Mode - The single-pedal driving mode, designed to simplify driving and enhance efficiency, has led to confusion and safety concerns among drivers accustomed to traditional dual-pedal systems [49][52]. - Drivers have reported instances of mistakenly treating the accelerator as a brake, resulting in near accidents [52]. Group 7: Industry Response and Future Directions - As consumer dissatisfaction grows, some manufacturers are beginning to prioritize user experience over flashy designs, with improvements in heat insulation for panoramic roofs and adjustments to door handle designs [55][57]. - Regulatory changes are also being implemented, such as new standards for hidden door handles and restrictions on single-pedal driving modes, indicating a shift towards enhancing safety and usability in EV designs [57][59].