隐藏式门把手的设计并非新生事物，其历史可追溯至1952年，当时搭载在奔驰300SL上，主要目的是降低风阻。然而，真正让它流行起来的，是2012年特斯 拉ModelS采用的电控弹出式设计。这一创新引发了众多新能源车企的效仿，隐藏式门把手逐渐成为新能源车的科技感标配，甚至部分燃油车也加以跟进。 有数据显示，到2025年，国内新上市的新能源车型中，超过五成装配了隐藏式门把手，部分头部车企更是实现了全系车型标配。 但看似科技感十足的隐藏式门把手，实际效果不尽如人意。据测试，它仅能带来0.0012cd的风阻微弱改善，对电动车续航的提升也仅仅只有几公里。相比之 下，其带来的弊端日益凸显。如在实际使用中，当气温较低时，门把手容易被冻住，无法正常弹出。更为严重的是，在一些交通事故中，车辆碰撞后隐藏式 门把手可能无法自动弹出，同时内门把手隐藏在看不见的凹槽内，导致乘客在紧急情况下无法快速开门下车，增加了救援难度和时间，威胁乘客的生命安 全。 此次新国标的出台，意味着因新能源汽车快速发展而流行起来的隐藏式门把手将逐渐退出历史舞台。新规对车企设置了过渡期：对于新申请批准的车型， 2027年1月1日起，需满足除"手部操作空间"外的全 ...

转自：车评社 前言：对于汽车而言，不以安全为前提的"网红设计"，就是耍流氓。 继隐藏式门把手被新规戴上"紧箍咒"后，汽车圈的"网红设计"再迎重拳。日前，工信部公布强制性国家 标准GB 11557-202X《防止汽车转向机构对驾驶员伤害的规定》报批稿，明确 2027年1月1日起正式施 行。这份直接删除半幅方向盘所有技术内容的文件，并非简单的"禁令"，而是以"无标可依"的方式，宣 告了这一设计在民用市场的终结。中国汽车安全监管，正从被动补漏进入主动立规的新高度。 有趣的是，就在半幅方向盘被"判死刑"的同时，特斯拉无方向盘的Cybercab已量产下线，试图直接跨 越"人类驾驶"的边界。这种看似矛盾的行业图景，实则勾勒出智能驾驶的两条清晰路径：一条是车企急 于求成的"捷径"，用异形设计制造噱头；另一条是真正的技术攻坚，以高阶自动驾驶重构出行方式。但 无方向盘的未来，在中国市场仍面临重重壁垒。 目前我国法规仍要求自动驾驶车辆配备人类操控接口，即便工信部已为线控转向扫清障碍，也始终坚 持"安全第一、循序渐进"的原则。特斯拉在北美尚需依赖监管豁免才能上路，在路况更复杂的中国，短 期内更难突破法规与安全的双重防线。 此次新规 ...

Core Points - The new mandatory national standard for automotive door handles requires each door (excluding the tailgate) to be equipped with a mechanical release function, meaning traditional pull handles must be included alongside electronic options [1] - The criticism of hidden door handles is highlighted, as they can lead to user frustration and safety concerns, especially in adverse weather conditions [1] - The article emphasizes that safety should always be the priority in automotive design, and innovations that compromise safety for aesthetics or marketing gimmicks are not acceptable [2] Industry Insights - The automotive industry is facing scrutiny over design choices that prioritize aesthetics over functionality, such as hidden door handles and touch screens that distract drivers [1][2] - Companies that focus on practical innovations addressing consumer pain points are more likely to gain trust and positive reputation among consumers [2] - The article warns against companies that prioritize flashy marketing over quality and safety, suggesting that such approaches could lead to negative outcomes [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the discomfort and practical issues faced by electric vehicle (EV) owners due to innovative designs that prioritize aesthetics and technology over user comfort and safety, particularly in extreme weather conditions [1][3][54]. Group 1: Issues with Panoramic Glass Roofs - The panoramic glass roofs, initially marketed for their spaciousness and aesthetic appeal, have become a source of discomfort, turning vehicles into "sauna rooms" during summer [4][5]. - Many EV models, including those from brands like Zhiji, Zeekr, and NIO, feature panoramic roofs, but owners report excessive heat and discomfort, leading to potential interior damage [9][11]. - The automotive industry’s focus on design has overshadowed the need for comfort, as the technology for heat insulation has not fully addressed the issue of heat retention in extreme temperatures [11][57]. Group 2: Hidden Door Handles - Hidden door handles, while designed to reduce drag and enhance aesthetics, have received significant criticism, with 69% of consumers expressing concerns about their usability and reliability [13][15]. - Issues such as freezing in winter and mechanical failures have led to frustrating experiences for users, including incidents where door handles failed to operate during emergencies [19][20]. - The repair costs for hidden door handles are significantly higher than traditional handles, leading to dissatisfaction among consumers [20]. Group 3: Full Touchscreens - The shift to full touchscreen controls has complicated user interactions, with many drivers finding it less efficient than traditional buttons, particularly for essential functions like air conditioning [22][24]. - Complaints about infotainment systems being overly complex and slow to respond have increased, with drivers reporting delays in critical situations [26][28]. - The reliance on touchscreens can also pose safety risks, as it distracts drivers from the road [28]. Group 4: Half-Width Steering Wheels - The introduction of half-width steering wheels has created operational challenges for drivers, making standard maneuvers more difficult and increasing the risk of losing grip [29][31]. - New drivers have reported difficulties adapting to this design, leading to potential safety hazards during driving [35][39]. Group 5: Electronic Side Mirrors - Electronic side mirrors, while visually appealing, have been criticized for their delayed response times and performance issues in adverse weather conditions [41][43]. - Users have reported that these mirrors can become obscured in rain or snow, compromising visibility and safety [43][46]. Group 6: Single-Pedal Driving Mode - The single-pedal driving mode, designed to simplify driving and enhance efficiency, has led to confusion and safety concerns among drivers accustomed to traditional dual-pedal systems [49][52]. - Drivers have reported instances of mistakenly treating the accelerator as a brake, resulting in near accidents [52]. Group 7: Industry Response and Future Directions - As consumer dissatisfaction grows, some manufacturers are beginning to prioritize user experience over flashy designs, with improvements in heat insulation for panoramic roofs and adjustments to door handle designs [55][57]. - Regulatory changes are also being implemented, such as new standards for hidden door handles and restrictions on single-pedal driving modes, indicating a shift towards enhancing safety and usability in EV designs [57][59].