临近十一、中秋双节长假（10.1-10.8），总有场内投资者小伙伴问，节前两天（9月29日、9月30日），场内还有些闲置资 金或者不想持股过节，有哪些低风险的类理财基金品种可以投资呢？在这里就抛转引玉，讲讲长假前两天，有哪些短期理 财品种可以供广大场内投资者选择： 一、9月29日(本周一） 周一为长假前倒数第二个交易日，对于场内有闲置资金且不想持股过节的，或能承受一定波动的低风险客户，可推荐客户 采用国债逆回购+债券ETF投资操作，具体如下： （一）深市（深市隔夜回购R-001+买入国开债券ETF（159651）） 可买入9月30日到期的深市隔夜逆回购131810，用到期逆回购资金买场内国开债券ETF（159651），享双份收益，具体操作 是： （二）沪市（沪市隔夜回购GC001+买入公司债ETF（511030）） 可买入9月30日到期的沪市隔夜逆回购GC001，用到期逆回购资金买场内公司债ETF（511030），享双份收益，具体操作 是： 1、9月29日，做一笔沪市隔夜国债逆回购204001，该笔回购将于9月30日到期； 2、9月30日，回购资金可用但不可取，可场内买入公司债ETF(511030)； 3、1 ...

截至2025年9月11日 11:24，公司债ETF(511030)多空胶着，最新报价106.07元。拉长时间看，截至2025 年9月10日，公司债ETF近半年累计上涨1.11%。 流动性方面，公司债ETF盘中换手0.5%，成交1.14亿元。拉长时间看，截至9月10日，公司债ETF近1周 日均成交21.92亿元。 规模方面，公司债ETF最新规模达228.48亿元。 资金流入方面，公司债ETF最新资金流入流出持平。拉长时间看，近5个交易日内，合计"吸金"9773.82 万元。 数据显示，杠杆资金持续布局中。公司债ETF连续3天获杠杆资金净买入，最高单日获得903.44万元净 买入，最新融资余额达788.04万元。 信用债ETF赎回缩水，总规模3560亿元，单日下降8.0亿元，其中基准做市ETF下降4.7亿元、科创债ETF 下降0.4亿元；加权久期中位数3.8年。流动性：整体成交金额631亿元，平均单笔成交额299万元（基准 做市247万元、科创债386万元）；换手率中位数9.1%。估值情况：收益率中位数1.94%，贴水率中位 数-23.8BP（基准做市-31.5BP、科创债-19.1BP）。 在债市调整且信用债E ...

Core Viewpoint - The bond market issues are primarily endogenous, and the sustainability of the stock market is contingent on the resolution of bond market bubbles [1] Group 1: Bond Market Analysis - The progress of bond bubble resolution can be observed through the R007-10Y yield spread, which needs to normalize for bond value to recover [1] - The current R007-10Y yield spread is approaching a normal state, with a moving average level of 24 basis points, compared to a normal level of approximately 29 basis points observed from January to November last year [1] - The potential for yield correction offers limited upward adjustment space of about 5 basis points, suggesting a reasonable 10Y government bond yield at around 1.78% [1] Group 2: ETF Performance - The Ping An Company Bond ETF (511030) has shown the best performance in controlling drawdowns during the recent bond market adjustment, with minimal trading discounts and stable net value [1] - A detailed table of various bond ETFs indicates their recent performance, with the Ping An Company Bond ETF having a scale of 22.353 billion and a year-to-date return of -0.119% [1] - Other ETFs listed show varying degrees of performance, with some experiencing larger drawdowns and trading discounts compared to the Ping An ETF [1]

Core Viewpoint - The inclusion of multiple credit bond ETFs, such as Bosera Credit Bond ETF (159396), Shanghai Stock Exchange Corporate Bond ETF (511070), and Corporate Bond ETF (511030), into the general pledge repo application has been approved by China Securities Depository and Clearing Corporation Limited (CSDC) [1] Group 1 - The recent notice from China Securities indicates that eligible credit bond ETF products can pilot the general pledge repo business on the exchange [1] - Bosera fund manager Zhang Lei believes that the inclusion of credit bond ETFs into the general pledge repo will provide several benefits for investors, including enhanced returns [1] - The convenience of exchange pledging is highlighted as a significant advantage for investors [1] Group 2 - From a liquidity perspective, credit bond ETFs exhibit significantly better on-market liquidity compared to individual corporate bonds [1]