Core Viewpoint - The departure of several star fund managers has prompted the industry to reflect on its reliance on individual reputations, signaling a shift from a "star era" to a "platform era" in public funds [1][7][14]. Group 1: Impact of Departures - The exit of key fund managers like Qiu Dongrong has led to significant scale fluctuations and performance challenges for their respective firms, highlighting the risks of depending on individual managers [1][3]. - After Qiu Dongrong's departure, the total assets under management at Zhonggeng Fund dropped from 189.72 billion to 116.07 billion, a year-on-year decrease of 38.82% [4]. - Other firms, such as Yuanxin Yongfeng Fund, also experienced a decline in total scale after the departure of manager Fan Yan, with a reduction from 356 billion to 323.81 billion [5]. Group 2: Industry Reflection and Changes - The industry is recognizing the need to rebuild trust in research teams and platforms rather than relying solely on star managers, as evidenced by the shift in investor sentiment [1][7]. - A trend towards team-based management is emerging, with firms increasingly hiring multiple managers for funds to ensure continuity and stability [9][10]. - The number of funds announcing the hiring of additional managers has surged, with 267 announcements made this year alone [10]. Group 3: Regulatory and Strategic Shifts - Regulatory bodies have long been concerned about the "star phenomenon" in public funds, advocating for a transition to a more team-oriented and platform-based investment approach [13][14]. - The industry is moving towards a "platform era," where the focus is on collective team performance rather than individual star managers, as seen in the strategies of firms like Zhonggeng and Zhongou [16]. - The emphasis on team capabilities and a comprehensive investment research framework is becoming a priority for firms, aligning with regulatory expectations [12][16].

Group 1 - The public fund industry is undergoing a significant management model transformation, shifting from reliance on a single fund manager to a collaborative "multi-manager" approach [1][4] - As of July 8, over 700 funds have appointed additional fund managers this year, with the number of funds managed by three or four managers on the rise [1][3] - Notable fund managers, such as Ge Lan and Zheng Chengran, have recently announced the appointment of additional managers to their funds, indicating a trend towards shared management [3][4] Group 2 - The rise of the "co-management" model is driven by industry transformation and regulatory advocacy, bringing positive changes to the sector [4] - The multi-manager approach enhances asset coverage and expands the skill set of fund managers while improving strategy diversification [4] - This model effectively mitigates risks associated with single decision-maker errors and aggressive operations, and addresses challenges related to fund performance continuity in the event of a manager's departure [4]

Core Viewpoint - The performance of Xingzheng Global Fund has significantly declined, primarily due to the departure of star fund manager Dong Chengfei and the subsequent drop in the management scale of its actively managed equity funds, leading to a substantial decrease in revenue and net profit [3][5][19]. Group 1: Financial Performance - In 2024, Xingzheng Global Fund reported operating revenue of 3.279 billion yuan and net profit of 1.413 billion yuan, marking a decline of over 50% in revenue and nearly 37% in net profit compared to 2021 [3][5]. - The fund's actively managed equity fund scale dropped from 218.729 billion yuan in 2021 to 124.12 billion yuan by the end of 2024, reflecting a significant reduction in management fees [7][19]. - The decline in revenue and profit is attributed to the overall decrease in the performance of actively managed equity funds and the regulatory changes that reduced management fees from 1.5% to 1.2% [5][19]. Group 2: Competitive Comparison - In contrast, E Fund's operating revenue only decreased by approximately 16% and net profit by about 14%, indicating that Xingzheng Global Fund's performance decline is more severe [4]. - The poor performance of Xingzheng Global Fund's actively managed equity funds is linked to the lack of competitive investment returns compared to peers, with many funds underperforming their benchmarks [19]. Group 3: Management Challenges - The departure of Dong Chengfei has led to a talent drain within the company, resulting in a significant drop in the performance of flagship funds like Xingquan Trend Investment Mixed Fund, which has seen losses of nearly 10 billion yuan over three years [7][15][19]. - The current fund managers, including Xie Zhiyu and Dong Li, have not been able to replicate the previous success, with their management periods yielding negative returns [15][19]. - The company faces challenges in attracting and retaining top talent, which is critical for improving fund performance and regaining investor confidence [19].