Core Insights - The article discusses the increasing policy support for the development of technology managers in China, highlighting various initiatives and training programs launched in different regions [1][2] - It emphasizes the significant gap in the number of technology managers compared to developed countries, indicating a need for more professionals in this emerging field [2][4] - The article outlines the challenges faced by technology managers, particularly the reduction in corporate innovation budgets and the lack of understanding of their role among businesses [4][5] Group 1: Definition and Current Status - Technology managers are defined as professionals involved in the transfer and commercialization of scientific achievements, playing roles in organization, coordination, management, and consulting [2][3] - The current ratio of researchers to technology managers in China is less than 100:1, compared to higher ratios in Europe, indicating a significant shortage [2] - As of 2023, China has approximately 7.24 million full-time equivalent R&D personnel, with a target of having over 30,000 technology managers by 2025, suggesting a potential shortfall of 320,000 to 1.78 million technology managers [2] Group 2: Challenges Faced - The primary challenge identified is the reduction in corporate innovation budgets, with many companies prioritizing survival over development due to economic pressures [4][5] - Many traditional manufacturing firms are hesitant to invest in new technologies, often waiting until they are forced to adapt due to market pressures [4] - The high costs of technology updates in certain industries, such as chemicals, deter companies from taking risks, while sectors like agriculture show more openness to new technologies [5] Group 3: Market Dynamics - There is a general lack of awareness and understanding of the technology manager's role among businesses, leading to unrealistic expectations and low willingness to pay for services [5][6] - Many companies prefer to bypass technology managers and directly connect with researchers, viewing this as a more informal approach rather than a professional service [5] - The project cycles for technology transfer are lengthy, often taking six months to a year, with low success rates in securing deals, which makes full-time engagement in this field unsustainable [6] Group 4: Training and Development - Current training for technology managers is primarily generic, lacking depth in specific industry knowledge, which is crucial for building trust with companies [7][8] - There is a call for more specialized training programs that focus on vertical industry knowledge, which would better meet the practical needs of technology managers [8][9] - The establishment of associations for technology managers is suggested to facilitate resource sharing and improve industry standards [9][10] Group 5: Policy Recommendations - Industry professionals advocate for the creation of specific policies to support technology managers, including standardized agreements and recognition of their value [10] - The formation of provincial or industry-specific technology manager associations is recommended to enhance training and resource integration [10] - A unified standard for transaction agreements is proposed to improve efficiency and operational consistency within the industry [10]

Core Insights - The first training session for intermediate technical brokers in the pharmaceutical and healthcare sector was held in Suzhou, with over 120 participants involved in medical achievement transformation [1] Group 1: Training Overview - The training was organized by the Jiangsu International Intellectual Property Operation and Transaction Center, under the support of the Suzhou Health Commission and the National Technology Transfer Talent Training Base Suzhou South Center [1] - The focus of the training was on the development of the pharmaceutical and healthcare industry, aiming to cultivate technical brokers with both professional knowledge and market capabilities [1] Group 2: Target Audience - Participants included individuals from medical institutions, universities, enterprises, and related technology service organizations engaged in research management and achievement transformation [1] - The training also targeted healthcare and research personnel who have made significant contributions to medical technology innovation, as well as those aspiring to work in the field of pharmaceutical and biotechnology technology transfer [1]