Workflow
新格伦重型火箭
icon
Search documents
SpaceX文件显示月球着陆器最快要2028年才准备好,美国登月计划或又拖后一年
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-11-20 22:36
Core Points - The Artemis lunar landing program, heavily politicized in the U.S., is facing significant delays, with the crewed lunar lander developed by SpaceX not expected to be ready until September 2028, pushing back NASA's planned Artemis 3 mission to at least 2028 [1][2][3] - Concerns are rising that China may achieve its lunar landing goals before the U.S. due to these delays [1][8] Timeline of the Artemis Program - NASA's original plan aimed to send astronauts to the Moon by mid-2027, but this timeline is now "almost certain" to be delayed further [2] - SpaceX's internal documents indicate that the first crewed lunar landing could occur as late as September 2028, following a series of critical tests scheduled for 2026 and 2027 [2][3] - The Artemis 2 and Artemis 3 missions have already been postponed from 2023 and 2024 to 2026 and beyond, respectively, with the average interval between missions now exceeding two years [7] Technical Challenges - The SpaceX Starship rocket, essential for the Artemis 3 mission, has faced multiple failures during testing, raising doubts about its reliability and the feasibility of the planned lunar missions [3][5] - NASA's acting administrator has criticized SpaceX for its slow progress and announced a restart of bidding for alternative lunar lander solutions, indicating a need for backup plans [5][6] Competitive Landscape - The U.S. lunar program's delays have led to fears of falling behind China, which is progressing steadily towards its goal of landing astronauts on the Moon by 2030 [8][10] - Blue Origin is emerging as a potential competitor to SpaceX, developing its own lunar lander for future Artemis missions, although its timeline may not surpass SpaceX's [10]
中美5型大火箭冲刺年底发射,谁能成为世界第二?
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-11-07 00:28
Core Points - The competition between American and Chinese companies in the reusable rocket sector is intensifying, with both sides aiming to achieve significant milestones by the end of the year [5][19] - Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket is set for its second flight, which is crucial for validating its recovery capabilities, while China's Zhuque-3 rocket is rapidly progressing towards its first flight [8][11] Group 1: Blue Origin and New Glenn - Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket, standing at 98 meters tall and capable of carrying 45 tons to low Earth orbit, aims to challenge SpaceX's Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets [7][17] - The first flight of New Glenn is scheduled for January 2025, but it has faced multiple delays and has not yet successfully completed a recovery test [7][8] - The upcoming NG-2 mission in November is critical for recovery validation, with the goal of landing the booster on the recovery ship "Jacqueline" [8][12] Group 2: Chinese Competitors - China's Zhuque-3 rocket, developed by Landspace, has made significant progress, completing its static fire test and aiming for its first flight in the fourth quarter of 2025 [11][12] - The Zhuque-3 rocket is designed with a focus on reusability, utilizing a stainless steel and methane combination, which is seen as a forward-thinking approach compared to traditional designs [11][12] - Other Chinese rockets, including Lijian-2, Tianlong-3, and Chang Zheng-12, are also in development, showcasing a strong push from both state-owned and private companies in the commercial space sector [14][19] Group 3: Industry Dynamics - The race for reusable rockets is not just between two companies but involves multiple players, with China potentially launching four new rockets by the end of 2025 [19][20] - The collaboration between state-owned enterprises and private companies in China is seen as a strategic advantage that could lead to sustained growth and competitiveness in the global space market [19][20] - The contrasting development timelines highlight the urgency and efficiency of Chinese companies compared to their American counterparts, with Zhuque-3 taking only 26 months to reach its first flight milestone compared to New Glenn's 260 months [11][18]