Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the effectiveness of a diversified asset allocation strategy, referred to as the "three-part method," which has yielded a cumulative return of 8.88% as of July 25, 2022, despite market volatility [1][4][9]. Group 1: Performance Analysis - The "three-part method" has consistently achieved stable returns through gradual increases, with daily returns often reflecting a slow but steady growth pattern [4][6]. - Monthly performance data indicates that only January and April experienced slight declines, with January down by -0.03% and April down by -0.1%, while the broader market faced more significant downturns [6][9]. - The strategy has demonstrated resilience during market fluctuations, maintaining positive returns even when major indices like the NASDAQ experienced declines exceeding 8% [9][10]. Group 2: Asset Allocation Strategy - The proposed asset allocation consists of 60% equity funds, 30% bond funds, and 10% commodity funds, designed to balance risk and return [14][15]. - Specific fund allocations include a mix of domestic and international assets, such as the E Fund Zhongdai New Composite Index and the Guotai Junan CSI 1000 Index Enhanced Fund, each contributing to the overall strategy [11][15]. - The strategy aims to capture diverse market trends and reduce correlation among asset classes, enhancing the long-term success rate of the portfolio [15][16]. Group 3: Investment Philosophy - The article advocates for a high win-rate investment approach rather than chasing high-risk, high-reward opportunities, which often lead to losses [17][22]. - It highlights the importance of patience and a long-term perspective in investing, contrasting with the allure of quick wealth through speculative strategies [21][22]. - The "three-part method" is positioned as a sustainable investment strategy that allows for gradual wealth accumulation through diversified and balanced asset allocation [22].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by investors in uncertain market conditions, particularly highlighting the historical context of inflation and market downturns, and introduces the concept of a "Permanent Portfolio" as a strategy for risk management and steady returns [2][3][4]. Group 1: Historical Context and Market Analysis - In 2025, the U.S. stock market experienced significant declines due to uncertain tariff policies, with economic growth forecasts being downgraded and rising unemployment and inflation expectations, raising concerns about stagflation risks [2]. - Historical parallels are drawn to 1981, where high inflation and declining asset values led to a challenging investment environment, with the S&P 500 index falling by 5% and long-term government bonds dropping by 9% [2]. - The article notes that in 2022, aggressive interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve led to severe market volatility, with the Nasdaq index plummeting by 33% and bond markets experiencing rare declines [2]. Group 2: Investment Strategy - The "Permanent Portfolio" strategy proposed by Harry Browne involves dividing investments equally among stocks, long-term government bonds, cash, and gold, aiming to balance risk and returns [3][4]. - The core logic of the Permanent Portfolio is to diversify risk, balance assets, and maintain long-term holdings, acknowledging the limitations of market predictions [4]. - Historical data indicates that the Permanent Portfolio strategy has achieved an annualized return of approximately 7% over the past 30 years, with volatility controlled below 9% and maximum drawdowns typically under 15% [5]. Group 3: Practical Implementation - The "Snowball Three-Part Method" is introduced as a practical tool to replicate the Permanent Portfolio, helping investors diversify risk across three dimensions [6]. - The investment allocation includes stocks to capture economic growth, bonds for stability during downturns, gold for inflation hedging, and cash for flexibility [9]. - The article emphasizes the importance of asset diversification beyond just stocks, bonds, gold, and cash, suggesting the use of funds and international markets to enhance portfolio resilience [10]. Group 4: Performance Comparison - The article presents a performance comparison of the Permanent Portfolio against traditional 60/40 portfolios and single market investments, highlighting its lower volatility and drawdown during market downturns [22][24]. - Over the past five years, the Permanent Portfolio achieved an annualized return of 7.8% with a volatility of 7.3%, significantly lower than that of the A-share and U.S. stock markets [25][26]. - The Permanent Portfolio's maximum drawdown was limited to -9.2% during the market crash of 2022, showcasing its strong risk management capabilities [26].