证券日报网2月3日讯，华勤技术（603296）在接受调研者提问时表示，存储芯片公司不做直接采购，主 要由客户供应，因此存储芯片的价格波动对公司整体的利润水平基本没有影响。手机行业出货有一定压 力，预计2026年行业整体大致会有10%左右的同比下滑，但目前公司看到客户机型推出速度变快、型号 变多、ODM渗透率进一步提升，能够对冲一些行业下滑的影响，公司会持续保持智能手机ODM行业第 一的位置。穿戴业务受存储涨价影响更小一些，品牌客户替代长尾的白牌的趋势在持续，公司会跟随品 牌客户继续快速成长，26年穿戴预计营收30%以上增长。综上，公司整体智能终端板块(含手机、穿戴 等)来看，仍会保持稳健的增长。 ...

Core Insights - The core issue revolves around the loss of control over the key asset, Nexperia, by Wentai Technology, which has resulted in a significant market value drop and a governance crisis [1][4][7] Group 1: Company Overview - Wentai Technology's stock price has dropped significantly, losing over 10 billion yuan in market value within two days [1] - The company invested 33.2 billion yuan to acquire Nexperia, a Dutch semiconductor firm, which it controlled for five years before losing governance rights [1][4] - The management change was driven by former executives who had previously collaborated with Wentai's founder, Zhang Xuezheng [1][3] Group 2: Acquisition Background - The acquisition of Nexperia was seen as a bold move by Zhang, who aimed to leverage Chinese capital for the growth of the European company [4][5] - Initial integration was successful, with Nexperia achieving record revenues of 2.36 billion euros in 2022 and improving gross margins from 25% in 2020 to 42.4% [4][5] - Tensions began to surface in 2021 due to failed acquisitions and government scrutiny, leading to a deterioration of relations between Wentai and Nexperia's management [5][6] Group 3: Geopolitical Context - The situation escalated in 2024 with a cyberattack on Nexperia and subsequent U.S. sanctions, which placed Wentai on an entity list, complicating its operations [6][7] - The introduction of the "50% rule" by the U.S. further threatened Nexperia's ability to engage with American suppliers, creating panic among its European management [6][10] - The court's rapid decision to suspend Zhang's position and place Wentai's shares in Nexperia under third-party control highlights the geopolitical pressures faced by Chinese firms [6][7] Group 4: Challenges in Cross-Border M&A - The case illustrates the unequal playing field for Chinese companies in cross-border acquisitions, facing stringent political scrutiny and operational restrictions [8][9] - Chinese firms often encounter various limitations, such as mandatory local management retention and technology transfer restrictions, which do not apply to Western firms acquiring Chinese companies [8][9][10] - The reliance on U.S. technology and equipment creates vulnerabilities for Chinese firms, as seen in Nexperia's dependency on American semiconductor supplies [10][23] Group 5: Strategic Missteps - The analysis identifies four strategic failures in Chinese overseas investments, including over-reliance on foreign intermediaries and lack of government backing [15][16][18] - The absence of pre-established dispute resolution mechanisms has left Chinese firms at a disadvantage in foreign legal systems [17][18] - The need for a national-level support system for Chinese firms in international markets is emphasized, particularly in high-stakes industries like semiconductors [18][19] Group 6: Future Directions - The incident signals a need for Chinese companies to pivot from relying on overseas acquisitions for technology to focusing on independent R&D [22][23] - There is a call for a strategic reassessment of investment targets, prioritizing those with lower geopolitical risks [22][23] - The overarching theme is the necessity for enhanced domestic capabilities and a robust risk management framework to navigate the complexities of international business [24][25]