Core Viewpoint - The call to revoke ICP licenses for apps that do not support HarmonyOS NEXT is seen as an abuse of power and lacks legal basis, potentially harming user rights and the development of HarmonyOS NEXT itself [5]. Legal and Regulatory Issues - The legal basis for ICP licenses pertains to information service qualifications in China, focusing on content safety, network security, and user personal information protection. The demand to revoke licenses based on OS support does not align with these core regulatory goals, indicating a clear misuse of authority [5]. - This request improperly shifts the responsibility of app store reviews and OS ecosystem development onto the regulatory bodies responsible for ICP licensing, representing a significant functional misalignment [5]. Impact on User Rights - Reduced App Choices: The potential exit of many popular international apps or small apps unable to adapt could severely limit user options in the Chinese market [5]. - Decreased User Experience: Mandatory adaptation may lead to poorly optimized, incomplete, or outdated versions of apps for HarmonyOS NEXT, ultimately harming user experience [5]. - Cost Transfer: Increased adaptation costs for developers may be passed on to users through higher service prices or increased advertising [5]. Potential Negative Effects on HarmonyOS NEXT Development - Reputation Damage: Relying on administrative coercion rather than technical strength and ecosystem appeal could harm the domestic and international reputation of HarmonyOS, creating a negative perception of being "closed" and "coercive," which is detrimental to its global development [5]. - Concealment of Real Issues: Coercive measures may obscure genuine problems within HarmonyOS NEXT regarding developer tools, development experience, profitability models, and cross-platform compatibility, hindering its self-improvement through market competition [5]. Adverse International Impact - Such actions may be viewed by the international community as serious market barriers and trade protectionism, damaging China's image as a proponent of an open business environment and potentially leading to unnecessary trade friction and diplomatic disputes [5].