博茨瓦纳是非洲经济发展较快的国家之一，人口约255.1万，2024年国内生产总值为194亿美元。钻石业 是该国经济支柱，产值约占国内生产总值的三分之一，钻石产量位居全球第二。然而受全球天然钻石消 费需求下降的影响，博茨瓦纳钻石产量近年来不断下降。根据国际货币基金组织此前的预测，博茨瓦纳 2025年经济预计会萎缩1%。 转载请注明央视财经 （央视财经《天下财经》）很长一段时间以来，天然钻石价格持续走低，以钻石业为支柱产业的非洲国 家博茨瓦纳财政收入不断减少。为了增加收入，博茨瓦纳政府正着手推出一项"黄金护照"计划，预计相 关提案将在今年（2026年）年初提交给议会进行表决。 根据政府拟定的这项"黄金护照"计划，外国申请人在博茨瓦纳一次性投资约10万美元、约合人民币70万 元，就可获得博茨瓦纳公民身份，这项由该国政府拟定的"黄金护照"提案尚需议会通过，预计将在今年 年初进行投票表决。该计划相关负责人表示，目前已有约1000名外国人提交了申请意向，其中来自美 国、津巴布韦和印度的申请者数量位列前三。据悉，政府希望通过实施这一计划能在未来五年里增加约 5亿美元的财政收入。 编辑：令文芳 ...

Core Points - The article discusses the significant changes in the U.S. government structure under Trump's administration, particularly the renaming of the Department of Defense to the Department of War, reflecting a broader ideological shift [1] - It highlights the ongoing political battles between the Democratic and Republican parties, emphasizing the constitutional challenges posed by Trump's executive orders [2] - The article also examines Trump's strategic use of executive power to bypass traditional legislative processes, showcasing a trend of expanding executive authority [8][23] Group 1: Executive Power Expansion - Trump's administration has increasingly utilized executive orders to assert control, often bypassing legislative approval, as seen in the renaming of the Department of Defense [1][6] - The article notes that Trump's approach to executive orders has become more sophisticated, exploiting legal loopholes to challenge the traditional bureaucratic structure [3][6] - The use of "parallel nomenclature" to rename government departments illustrates a tactical maneuver to consolidate power without formal legislative changes [6] Group 2: Political and Legal Challenges - Trump's opponents have reacted strongly against his executive actions, with plans to challenge them in court, indicating a deepening partisan divide [2][4] - The article describes the legal battles surrounding the appointment of federal officials, highlighting the complexities and conflicts arising from Trump's appointments [4][5] - The ongoing struggle between the executive branch and the judiciary reflects broader concerns about the erosion of checks and balances in the U.S. political system [2][8] Group 3: Ideological Implications - The article argues that Trump's actions represent a challenge to the post-World War II ideological framework of the U.S. government, aiming to reshape its foundational principles [1][23] - It suggests that Trump's expansion of executive power is not unique but part of a historical trend among U.S. presidents, raising questions about the nature of governance and authority [8][15] - The concept of a "deep state" is explored, indicating a belief that entrenched bureaucratic interests oppose Trump's agenda, complicating his efforts to implement change [16][23] Group 4: Economic Policies and Globalization - Trump's recent policies, such as imposing high fees on H1B visa applications and introducing a "Trump Golden Card" for wealthy immigrants, reflect a shift in economic strategy towards leveraging foreign capital [17][18] - The article discusses how these policies aim to attract investment while simultaneously asserting national control over economic resources [17][19] - It highlights the tension between traditional neoliberal globalization and Trump's more nationalist economic approach, suggesting a potential reconfiguration of U.S. economic policy [17][19]