Core Viewpoint - Companies planning to shift their main business to Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) may struggle to achieve their goal of listing in Hong Kong due to the cautious stance of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) towards cryptocurrency accumulation platforms posing as listed companies [2][3] Regulatory Stance - HKEX has raised inquiries with at least five companies attempting to make DAT their core business, and none of these listing applications have been approved [2] - The regulatory approach of HKEX aligns with existing rules aimed at preventing the emergence of "shell companies" and ensuring that listed companies have substantive business operations [5][6] - The HKEX's decision reflects a broader regulatory framework in Hong Kong, where the Securities and Futures Commission has not prioritized DAT in its digital asset development policy [7] Market Impact - The DAT business model, characterized by a cycle of financing, cryptocurrency acquisition, market value growth, and refinancing, has attracted significant capital, with total financing exceeding $20 billion from early this year to late September [8] - Despite the influx of capital, many DAT companies are trading at or below their net asset values, raising concerns about asset bubbles and insider trading [9] - The restrictions imposed by HKEX may lead to a cooling effect on the cryptocurrency sector, prompting investors to reassess compliance risks and focus on regulated products [10] Future Directions - Companies looking to enter the digital asset space must integrate their operations with the real economy, as exemplified by firms like 瑞和数智, which are investing in Web3.0 and collaborating on real-world asset digitization [11] - There remains potential for DAT companies to gain regulatory approval if they can connect their cryptocurrency assets with practical applications such as supply chain finance and cross-border payments [11] - The decision by HKEX aims to maintain stability in traditional capital markets while allowing room for compliant innovation, potentially positioning Hong Kong as a model for digital transformation in global financial centers [11]

Group 1 - The Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) is resisting cryptocurrency hoarding platforms disguised as listed companies, having raised concerns about at least five companies seeking to pivot to Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) as their core business [1] - HKEX's main rationale for its objections is based on rules regarding "cash companies," which aim to limit entities primarily holding liquid assets from being listed [1] - This trend is not unique to Hong Kong, as similar opposition to DAT has been observed in India and Australia, with the Bombay Stock Exchange rejecting a listing application for a company planning to invest in cryptocurrency [1][2] Group 2 - The regulatory actions have significantly pressured the market performance of these companies, with many digital asset treasury firms' stock prices declining and even falling below their net asset value (NAV) [2] - The recent downturn in the cryptocurrency market has exacerbated the situation, leading to investor skepticism regarding the sustainability of their business models [2]

Core Viewpoint - Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) is resisting cryptocurrency hoarding platforms disguised as listed companies, questioning the plans of at least five companies seeking to pivot to Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) as their core business [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - HKEX has raised concerns based on rules regarding "cash companies," which aim to limit entities primarily holding liquid assets from being listed [1] - The HKEX spokesperson stated that their framework ensures that all applicants for listing have viable, sustainable, and substantive business operations [1] - Similar resistance to DAT has been observed in India and Australia, with the Bombay Stock Exchange rejecting a listing application from a company planning to invest in cryptocurrency [1][2] Group 2: Market Impact - The regulatory actions have significantly pressured the market performance of these companies, with many digital asset treasury firms' stock prices declining and even falling below their net asset value (NAV) [2] - The recent downturn in the cryptocurrency market has exacerbated the situation, leading to increased investor skepticism regarding the sustainability of their business models [2]

Core Viewpoint - Stock exchanges in Hong Kong, India, and Australia are resisting cryptocurrency hoarding platforms disguised as public companies [3] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Hong Kong Stock Exchange has raised concerns about at least five companies seeking to pivot to Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) as their core business [3] - These companies have not received approval for their plans to transition to cryptocurrency hoarding [3] - Hong Kong currently prohibits public companies from transforming into entities solely focused on hoarding cryptocurrencies [3] Group 2: Responses from Exchanges - The Hong Kong Stock Exchange declined to comment on specific companies but emphasized that its framework ensures the viability and sustainability of all applicants seeking to list [3] - Similar opposition to DAT has been reported in India and Australia [3]

Core Viewpoint - The CEO of HashKey Group, Dr. Xiao Feng, highlighted that Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) is expected to be the optimal pathway for transferring crypto assets from on-chain to off-chain during the Bitcoin Asia 2025 conference [2] Group 1: Advantages of DAT over Traditional ETFs - Superior liquidity mechanism: DAT significantly enhances asset circulation efficiency, overcoming the lengthy redemption process of ETFs, thus providing investors with a more flexible and rapid asset movement channel [2] - Greater price elasticity and risk isolation: DAT generally exhibits higher market volatility and possesses risk isolation characteristics, creating richer arbitrage strategies and tool options for institutional investors [2] - More scientific leverage structure: DAT companies often design financing structures with leverage effects, offering higher capital appreciation potential compared to merely holding cryptocurrencies for value increase [2] - Built-in asset protection mechanism: DAT features a natural "downside protection"; when its stock price falls below the net value of underlying assets, investors can purchase Bitcoin or related ETFs at a discount, which is typically corrected quickly by the market [2] Group 2: Implications for Traditional Finance - These characteristics make DAT not only technically feasible but also structurally robust, establishing a more efficient bridge for crypto assets to enter the traditional financial sector [2]