你有没有想过，Meta（ Facebook ）训练AI用的数据里，有可能不只是维基百科、小说、YouTube视频……而是大家在某个晚上偷偷下载的成 人电影？ 你没听错。是色情片。而且不是三两个，而是2396部！ 上述内容并不是段子，而是真实发生的事情。 近日，美国加州地方法院的一纸诉状，正将Meta推入新一轮版权丑闻的漩涡。 原告是成人娱乐网站巨头Strike 3 Holdings，其平台每月吸引超 2500万访客 ，号称提供"好莱坞级别的高质量成人电影"，并自称是"伦理内容 的代表"。 他们指控Meta自 2018年起 ，便利用BitTorrent技术 系统性盗播其付费色情片 ，用于 训练AI模型， 包括视频生成器Meta Movie Gen、 LLaMA大语言模型，还有其他"未透露名称的模型"。 不仅如此，Meta还被控在下载后持续"种子分享"这些视频，最久长达数月。 Strike 3 Holdings在提交的证据中表示，自己 顺着这些 "做种"的 IP地址一查，其中47个都直接注册在Meta的公司名下。 还有更多IP被隐藏在所谓的"虚拟私有云"内，形成一张隐蔽的"公司级盗播网络"。 这意味着， Meta ...

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit filed by adult film giant Strike 3 Holdings against Meta highlights the issue of copyright infringement in the context of AI training, specifically focusing on the unauthorized use of adult film content for developing AI models [2][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Strike 3 Holdings and Counterlife Media accuse Meta of systematically pirating 2,396 adult films since 2018 for training its AI models, potentially leading to a compensation claim of $359 million (approximately 2.6 billion RMB) [2][3][16]. - The lawsuit marks a significant case as it is the first to address the use of adult film content in training video generation AI, differing from previous copyright disputes involving text and images [2][3]. Group 2: Impact on the Industry - The plaintiffs express concern that Meta's AI could replicate their unique production style at a fraction of the cost, threatening the viability of traditional adult film studios that invest in high-quality production [5][16]. - The lawsuit reveals that Meta allegedly utilized a "tit-for-tat" mechanism on the BT network to not only download but also distribute pirated content, which could significantly enhance download speeds [6][7][8]. Group 3: Evidence and Allegations - The lawsuit cites data from the plaintiffs' VXN Scan tracking system, which indicates that 47 Facebook-registered IPs were involved in illegal distribution, with over 100,000 instances of infringement verified [10][12]. - Meta is accused of constructing a piracy network using "shadow data centers" and non-human usage patterns, suggesting a deliberate strategy to collect training data for AI [11][12][14][15]. Group 4: Legal Proceedings and Reactions - The plaintiffs are seeking a jury trial, asserting that Meta's actions constitute both direct and indirect copyright infringement [16]. - Meta has publicly denied the allegations, but the evidence presented by the plaintiffs is considered substantial, leading to speculation about a potential out-of-court settlement [18].