Workflow
Meta Movie Gen
icon
Search documents
AI圈版权劫:从谷歌2.5亿罚单到Meta的成人片诉讼,巨头们都在忙应诉
3 6 Ke· 2025-09-07 00:27
Core Viewpoint - Leading AI companies such as Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta, Midjourney, and Google are facing unprecedented copyright infringement lawsuits, posing a significant challenge to the AI industry's development and the future of data acquisition and content creation [1][2][3]. Group 1: Anthropic - Anthropic has agreed to a settlement of at least $1.5 billion after being accused of large-scale copyright infringement for using pirated books to train its AI model Claude [3]. - The company is also facing allegations from major music publishers for illegally scraping lyrics from over 500 songs, with claims reaching up to $150,000 per song [3]. - Reddit has filed a lawsuit against Anthropic for illegally scraping millions of user comments to train Claude, contrasting with other companies that have secured licensing agreements [4]. Group 2: OpenAI - OpenAI is embroiled in a significant legal battle, being one of the most sued companies in the AI sector, with lawsuits alleging unauthorized use of millions of copyrighted articles to train ChatGPT [5][7]. - The New York Times has initiated a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, claiming that the generated content closely resembles original articles, impacting their subscription and advertising revenue [5]. - Multiple lawsuits from authors and media organizations accuse OpenAI of using copyrighted works without permission, with some cases being merged into multi-district litigation [7]. Group 3: Meta - Meta is facing several copyright infringement lawsuits, including accusations from authors for unauthorized use of their books to train AI models LLaMA 1 and LLaMA 2 [10]. - The company is also being sued by adult film production companies for illegally downloading and using copyrighted adult films for training its AI models, with claims reaching up to $359 million [11]. - In Europe, Meta is facing lawsuits from various authors and organizations for the unauthorized use of copyrighted content in training AI models [12]. Group 4: Midjourney and Stability AI - Midjourney and Stability AI are facing lawsuits for allegedly using copyrighted content to train their image generation models, with major entertainment companies filing claims [13][15]. - Disney and NBC Universal have accused Midjourney of using their intellectual property without authorization, while visual artists have also filed lawsuits against both companies for using their works [15]. - Stability AI has been sued by Getty Images for unauthorized use of millions of copyrighted images in training its models, with ongoing litigation [15]. Group 5: Google - Google has been fined €250 million by the French Competition Authority for using news content without permission to train its AI chatbot Bard, violating EU copyright laws [16]. - The ongoing legal disputes with the American Writers Association date back to 2005, with recent lawsuits alleging that Google’s use of scanned books for AI training violates copyright law [18]. Conclusion - The current wave of lawsuits indicates a shift in the AI industry from denial of infringement to seeking settlements and compliance, highlighting the ongoing struggle to balance technological innovation with copyright protection [18].
2396部片,一片罚15万,Meta用BT偷片训练AI,遭天价索赔
猿大侠· 2025-08-23 06:37
Core Viewpoint - Meta is facing serious copyright allegations from Strike 3 Holdings, which claims that Meta has been using adult films to train its AI models without authorization, potentially infringing on the copyrights of 2396 films and engaging in over 100,000 unauthorized distribution transactions [2][17]. Group 1: Allegations Against Meta - Strike 3 Holdings accuses Meta of systematically using BitTorrent technology to illegally stream and share its adult films since 2018 for AI training purposes [2][12]. - The lawsuit claims that Meta not only downloaded these films but also continued to "seed" them for months, indicating active participation in the BitTorrent network [3][5]. - Evidence presented by Strike 3 Holdings shows that 47 IP addresses linked to the seeding activities are registered under Meta's name, suggesting a corporate-level involvement in the copyright infringement [4][5]. Group 2: Implications of the Allegations - The use of adult films for AI training may allow Meta to create highly realistic virtual adult content at minimal cost, raising ethical concerns about the company's practices [15][16]. - The lawsuit highlights that this strategy could expose minors to adult content by bypassing age verification mechanisms, as the films were originally paid content [14]. - Strike 3 Holdings demands that Meta cease its infringing activities, delete all unauthorized content used for AI training, and pay potential damages amounting to $359 million, with $150,000 per film [18][23]. Group 3: Meta's Response - Meta has stated that it is reviewing the lawsuit but believes the allegations from Strike 3 Holdings are inaccurate [22]. - Despite being informed of the alleged infringement, Meta's BitTorrent activities reportedly continued, raising questions about the company's compliance with copyright laws [20][21].
偷 2396 部黄片,每部赔 15 万,小扎惹大事了!Meta 盗版海量小视频训练 AI
程序员的那些事· 2025-08-19 03:45
Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit filed by adult film giant Strike 3 Holdings against Meta highlights the issue of copyright infringement in the context of AI training, specifically focusing on the unauthorized use of adult film content for developing AI models [2][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Strike 3 Holdings and Counterlife Media accuse Meta of systematically pirating 2,396 adult films since 2018 for training its AI models, potentially leading to a compensation claim of $359 million (approximately 2.6 billion RMB) [2][3][16]. - The lawsuit marks a significant case as it is the first to address the use of adult film content in training video generation AI, differing from previous copyright disputes involving text and images [2][3]. Group 2: Impact on the Industry - The plaintiffs express concern that Meta's AI could replicate their unique production style at a fraction of the cost, threatening the viability of traditional adult film studios that invest in high-quality production [5][16]. - The lawsuit reveals that Meta allegedly utilized a "tit-for-tat" mechanism on the BT network to not only download but also distribute pirated content, which could significantly enhance download speeds [6][7][8]. Group 3: Evidence and Allegations - The lawsuit cites data from the plaintiffs' VXN Scan tracking system, which indicates that 47 Facebook-registered IPs were involved in illegal distribution, with over 100,000 instances of infringement verified [10][12]. - Meta is accused of constructing a piracy network using "shadow data centers" and non-human usage patterns, suggesting a deliberate strategy to collect training data for AI [11][12][14][15]. Group 4: Legal Proceedings and Reactions - The plaintiffs are seeking a jury trial, asserting that Meta's actions constitute both direct and indirect copyright infringement [16]. - Meta has publicly denied the allegations, but the evidence presented by the plaintiffs is considered substantial, leading to speculation about a potential out-of-court settlement [18].