Shares of GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) have declined 3.2% since the company reported its earnings for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2025. This compares to the S&P 500 index’s 0.2% growth over the same time frame. Over the past month, the stock has gained 2.3% versus the S&P 500’s 1.5% increase.GSI Technology reported a net loss of 9 cents per share for the third quarter of fiscal 2026, which is narrower than the year-ago quarter’s loss of 16 cents per share. Net revenues of $6.1 million marked a 12% increase co ...

Operating expenses rose to $10.1 million , compared with $7.0 million in the prior-year quarter and $6.7 million in the preceding quarter. Research and development expenses increased to $7.5 million from $4.0 million a year earlier and $3.8 million in the prior quarter, driven primarily by the purchase of IP related to Plato development and associated consulting expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $2.6 million , compared with $3.0 million in both the year-ago quarter and the prior q ...

GSI (NasdaqGS:GSIT) Q3 2026 Earnings call January 29, 2026 04:30 PM ET Company ParticipantsDidier Lasserre - VP of SalesDouglas Schirle - CFOLee-Lean Shu - Chairman, President, and CEOConference Call ParticipantsRobert Aguanno - Research AnalystOperatorWelcome to GSI Technology's Q3 Fiscal 2026 Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. At that time, we will provide instructions for those interested in entering the q ...

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Revenue in Q3 fiscal 2026 increased by 12% year-over-year and 28.5% on a fiscal year-to-date basis, reaching $6.1 million compared to $5.4 million in Q3 fiscal 2025 [3][11] - Gross margin was 52.7% in Q3 fiscal 2026, down from 54% in Q3 fiscal 2025 and 54.8% in the previous quarter [11] - Operating loss for Q3 fiscal 2026 was $6.9 million, compared to an operating loss of $4.1 million in the prior year and $3.2 million in the prior quarter [13] - Net loss in Q3 fiscal 2026 was $3 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $3.2 million, or $0.11 per diluted share in the previous quarter [14] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Sales to KYEC were $1.1 million, or 17.9% of net revenues, down from $1.2 million, or 22.7% of net revenues in the same period a year ago [9] - Sales to Nokia increased to $675,000, or 11.1% of net revenues, compared to $239,000, or 4.4% of net revenues in the same period a year ago [10] - Military defense sales accounted for 28.5% of third-quarter shipments, slightly down from 30% in the comparable quarter a year ago [10] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is focusing on defense applications, which have shown early success, particularly with the U.S. Department of Defense [20] - The partnership with G2 Tech is expected to enhance capabilities in real-world applications, particularly in defense and potential commercial uses beyond drones [22] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is advancing its APU roadmap and hardware development, with plans to tape out Plato in early 2027 [3] - A partnership with G2 Tech for a proof-of-concept in autonomous perimeter security is underway, supported by government funding [4][6] - The focus is on low-power edge AI applications, with an emphasis on performance per watt and responsiveness rather than peak training metrics [9] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about strong sales from major customers in the first half of calendar 2026 [3] - The company is actively pursuing non-dilutive R&D funding through government defense programs, which is expected to provide additional financial support [24] - Current expectations for Q4 fiscal 2026 are net revenues in the range of $5.7 million to $6.5 million, with a gross margin of approximately 54% to 56% [17] Other Important Information - The company reported a significant increase in cash and cash equivalents to $70.7 million as of December 31, 2025, primarily due to net proceeds from a registered direct offering [16] - Total operating expenses in Q3 fiscal 2026 were $10.1 million, up from $7 million in the same period a year ago, driven by increased R&D spending [11][12] Q&A Session Summary Question: Importance of defense applications for Gemini 2 - Management highlighted that military and defense sectors have been the quickest to adopt their technology, with successful SBIR wins and ongoing evaluations for various applications [20][21] Question: Potential timelines for government funding - Management indicated a continuous pipeline of submissions for SBIRs and other funding programs, emphasizing the non-dilutive nature of this funding and its importance for future business exposure [24]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Revenue in Q3 fiscal 2026 increased by 12% year-over-year and 28.5% on a fiscal year-to-date basis, reaching $6.1 million compared to $5.4 million in Q3 fiscal 2025 [3][12] - Gross margin decreased to 52.7% in Q3 fiscal 2026 from 54% in Q3 fiscal 2025, primarily due to product mix [12] - Operating loss for Q3 fiscal 2026 was $6.9 million, compared to an operating loss of $4.1 million in the prior year [13] - Net loss in Q3 fiscal 2026 was $3 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $3.2 million, or $0.11 per diluted share in the previous quarter [14][15] - Cash and cash equivalents increased to $70.7 million as of December 31, 2025, primarily due to $46.9 million in net proceeds from a registered direct offering [17] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Sales to KYEC were $1.1 million, or 17.9% of net revenues, down from $1.2 million, or 22.7% in the same period a year ago [10] - Sales to Nokia increased to $675,000, or 11.1% of net revenues, compared to $239,000, or 4.4% in the same period a year ago [11] - Military defense sales accounted for 28.5% of third-quarter shipments, slightly down from 30% in the comparable quarter a year ago [11] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is focusing on defense applications, which have shown early success, particularly with the U.S. Department of Defense [21] - The partnership with G2 Tech aims to leverage the company's technology for real-world applications, including drones and smart cities [24] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is advancing its APU roadmap and hardware development, with plans to tape out Plato in early 2027 [3] - The partnership with G2 Tech for the Sentinel program is expected to enhance the company's capabilities in autonomous perimeter security [4] - The focus is on non-dilutive R&D funding through government defense programs and strategic partnerships to support development [5] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about strong demand from major customers in the first half of calendar 2026 [3] - The company anticipates receiving over $1 million in government funding for the Sentinel project, which will offset R&D expenses [6] - The outlook for Q4 fiscal 2026 is net revenues in the range of $5.7 million to $6.5 million, with a gross margin of approximately 54% to 56% [18] Other Important Information - The company is expanding cash disclosures in its quarterly earnings to provide better insights into cash consumption and generation [16] - Total operating expenses in Q3 fiscal 2026 were $10.1 million, up from $7 million in the prior year [12] Q&A Session Summary Question: Importance of defense applications for Gemini 2 - Management highlighted that military and defense sectors have been the quickest to adopt their technology, with successful partnerships and applications already established [21][24] Question: Timelines for government funding - Management indicated a continuous pipeline of submissions for SBIRs and other funding opportunities, emphasizing the non-dilutive nature of this funding [26]

Core Insights - GSI Technology reported a revenue of $6.1 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2026, representing a 12% increase year-over-year, driven by sustained demand for SRAM solutions [3][4][7] - The company achieved significant milestones in the development of its Gemini-II technology, including a successful proof-of-concept for an autonomous perimeter security system [3][7] - GSI's gross margin for the quarter was approximately 52.7%, a decrease from 54.0% in the same quarter last year, attributed to product mix changes [4][6] Financial Performance - Net revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2026 were $6.1 million, compared to $5.4 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2025 and $6.4 million in the previous quarter [4][10] - The operating loss for the third quarter was $(6.9) million, compared to $(4.1) million in the prior-year period [9][10] - The net loss for the quarter was $(3.0) million, or $(0.09) per diluted share, an improvement from a net loss of $(4.0) million, or $(0.16) per diluted share, in the same quarter last year [10][21] Cash Flow and Balance Sheet - The company ended the quarter with a cash balance of $70.7 million, significantly up from $13.4 million at the end of the previous fiscal year [12][13] - Total operating expenses for the quarter were $10.1 million, an increase from $7.0 million in the same quarter last year, primarily due to higher research and development costs [6][9] - Cash used in operating activities was $(7.9) million, reflecting investments in the development and commercialization of Gemini-II and Plato [12][13] Customer and Market Insights - Sales to KYEC were $1.1 million, accounting for 17.9% of net revenues, while sales to Nokia increased to $675,000, representing 11.1% of net revenues [5] - Military and defense sales constituted 28.5% of third-quarter shipments, slightly down from 30.0% in the same period last year [5] - The company is pursuing initial design wins for Gemini-II in defense-oriented programs and select commercial edge deployments [3][7]

Summary of GSI Technology Conference Call Company Overview - **Company**: GSI Technology - **Headquarters**: Sunnyvale, California - **Founded**: 30 years ago, went public in 2007 - **Core Technologies**: APU (Associative Processing Unit) for AI, SRAM technology, and radiation-hardened memory solutions for space and military applications [1][3][4] Financial Performance - **Last Fiscal Year Revenue**: Just over $20 million - **Projected Growth**: Expected to grow about 20% for the current fiscal year [5][27] - **Cash and Cash Equivalents**: $25 million as of September, excluding a recent $47 million raised [6][27] - **Market Capitalization**: Approximately $270 million with 21% insider ownership [6] Product Lines SRAM Technology - **Product Line**: Highest density and performance SRAMs in the market, primarily from the Sigma Quad family [6][7] - **Revenue Contribution**: Majority of revenues come from the Sigma Quad family, with significant design wins in the third and fourth generations [6][7] APU Technology - **APU Overview**: Focused on edge computing with unique compute-in-memory architecture, allowing for massive parallel processing [10][11] - **Gemini 1 and Gemini 2**: AI chips designed for edge applications, with Gemini 2 being more versatile and capable of being sold as a chip [17][18] - **Performance Comparison**: Gemini 1 demonstrated 98% less power usage compared to NVIDIA's GPU in a specific application [17] Future Products - **Plato**: A next-generation device aimed at addressing large language models (LLMs) on the edge, with a tape-out expected in early 2027 [20][22][29] Market Opportunities - **Edge Computing Market**: Expected to grow from nearly $7 billion this year to over $16 billion in five years [10] - **Radiation-Hardened SRAM Market**: Projected to grow from $2 billion to nearly $5 billion by 2032, with high ASPs ranging from $10,000 to $30,000 and gross margins over 90% [9] Strategic Partnerships and Projects - **Partnership with G2 Tech**: Involved in a proof of concept (POC) for a multimodal VLM model for the Department of Defense, focusing on drone applications [19][37] - **Government Grants**: Awarded $3.4 million in SBIRs and additional funding for various defense projects [23][24][26] Competitive Landscape - **Market Position**: GSI Technology positions itself as a strong competitor against larger firms like NVIDIA and AMD, leveraging its established manufacturing capabilities and expertise in SRAM [28][29] Challenges and Future Outlook - **Revenue Growth**: The SRAM market has been flat, and future revenue growth is expected to come from the APU segment [42][44] - **Software Development**: Ongoing efforts to develop a compiler stack and functional libraries to support APU applications are critical for future design wins [45][48] - **Production Timeline**: Anticipated production for Gemini 2 in 2027, with prototypes expected by the end of 2026 [46][48] Key Takeaways - GSI Technology is at the forefront of AI and edge computing with its innovative APU technology - The company has a solid financial foundation and is strategically positioned for growth in the defense and aerospace sectors - Continued investment in R&D and software development is essential for capitalizing on emerging market opportunities and achieving profitability [27][44]

Core Insights - GSI Technology, Inc. has introduced the Gemini-II APU, which offers ultra-low power consumption and industry-leading performance for real-time drone workloads, targeting a market projected to reach $2.7 billion by 2030 [1][3]. Company Strategy - GSI Technology is focusing on high-growth AI edge processor markets, particularly in drones, where its architecture provides significant advantages in performance and power efficiency [1][3]. - The company has raised $50 million in equity to advance its roadmap for capturing opportunities in edge markets, emphasizing improvements in power efficiency, latency, and on-device intelligence [3]. Market Potential - The global edge AI processor market is expected to grow to $9.6 billion by 2030, driven by the transition of AI from data centers to purpose-built workloads at the edge [3]. - GSI Technology aims to leverage its established relationships with defense agencies and contractors to prioritize early edge AI deployment in drone and military vehicle markets [3]. Product Performance - The Gemini-II APU delivers GPU-class performance at only 15W, significantly lower than competitors, making it suitable for power- and size-constrained environments [2][3]. - A Cornell University study confirmed that GSI's APU architecture achieves GPU-class performance with over 98% lower energy consumption and can reduce total processing time by up to 80% compared to conventional CPUs [4].

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported net revenues of $6.4 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2026, compared to $4.6 million for the same period in fiscal 2025, and $6.3 million in the previous quarter [18] - Gross margin was 54.8% in the second quarter of fiscal 2026, up from 38.6% in the year-ago quarter but down from 58.1% in the preceding quarter [18] - The operating loss for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 was $3.2 million, an improvement from a loss of $5.6 million in the prior year period and a loss of $2.2 million in the previous quarter [19] - The net loss for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 was $3.2 million or $0.11 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $2.2 million or $0.08 per diluted share for the same period in fiscal 2025 [20] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Sales to KYEC were $802,000 or 12.5% of revenues, compared to $650,000 or 14.3% in the same period a year ago [16] - Sales to Nokia were $200,000 or 3.1% of revenues, down from $812,000 or 17.8% in the same period a year ago [16] - Military defense sales accounted for 28.9% of second quarter shipments, down from 40.2% in the comparable period a year ago [16] - SigmaQuad sales represented 50.1% of second quarter shipments, up from 38.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2025 [16] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is focusing on the military defense sector and edge applications, with significant interest in low power solutions for drones and military vehicles [10][12] - The Gemini II project has been approved for prototyping by an offshore defense contractor, indicating strong market validation [10] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to convert proof of concept projects into commercial customers and extend those relationships into large production programs [7] - The focus is on hardware and software development for Gemini II and the acquisition of necessary IP for the PLATO chip [6][12] - The company is prioritizing edge applications over data center solutions due to resource limitations and positive market feedback [73] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about the potential of Gemini II, particularly in defense applications, and highlighted the importance of low power consumption [45] - The company is actively engaging with strategic partners for the PLATO chip, which is expected to tape out in early calendar 2027 [13] - Management noted that the recent Cornell University validation of their technology has generated increased interest from potential customers [86] Other Important Information - The company closed a $50 million equity financing to accelerate execution across hardware and software development [5] - The company had $25.3 million in cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2025, compared to $13.4 million at the end of the previous quarter [20] Q&A Session Summary Question: Has the company done any work with the auto industry on autonomous vehicles? - The company has not yet engaged with the auto industry but sees potential for future adaptation of their technology in that space [23] Question: Was the recent $50 million placement with a strategic investor? - The placement was not with a strategic investor and there is no required holding period for the shares [26] Question: Is there a plan to have Cornell validate the Gemini II technology? - Discussions are ongoing to get a Gemini II board to Cornell and other researchers for validation [30] Question: How is the company differentiating its APU versus GPU competitors? - The company emphasizes its low power consumption and competitive performance metrics compared to NVIDIA GPUs [45] Question: What is the total addressable market the company is looking at over the next five years? - The market is expected to be in the tens of billions, with the company well-positioned to address it due to its power profile and algorithm work [53] Question: How will the $50 million raise be allocated? - The allocation will include fixed costs for PLATO and will be distributed evenly between Gemini II and PLATO development [59]

Core Insights - GSI Technology's Associative Processing Unit (APU) has been validated by Cornell University researchers, demonstrating that its Compute-In-Memory (CIM) architecture can achieve GPU-level performance for large-scale AI applications while significantly reducing energy consumption [1][2][3] Group 1: Performance and Efficiency - The APU delivers GPU-class performance at a fraction of the energy cost, with over 98% lower energy consumption compared to GPUs on large datasets [2][6] - The APU's design allows it to perform retrieval tasks several times faster than standard CPUs, reducing total processing time by up to 80% [6] Group 2: Market Opportunities - The findings indicate substantial opportunities for GSI Technology as industries increasingly seek performance-per-watt improvements, particularly in Edge AI applications for robotics, drones, and IoT devices [3] - The APU is positioned to serve defense and aerospace applications where high performance is required under strict energy and cooling constraints [3] Group 3: Future Developments - GSI Technology's second-generation APU, Gemini-II, is expected to deliver approximately 10 times faster throughput and lower latency for memory-intensive AI workloads, further enhancing energy efficiency [4] - The upcoming Plato APU aims to provide even greater compute capability at lower power for embedded edge applications [4] Group 4: Research Validation - The Cornell study represents one of the first comprehensive evaluations of a commercial compute-in-memory device under realistic workloads, benchmarking the GSI Gemini-I APU against established CPUs and GPUs [2][4]